User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Reproductive plasticity, oviposition site selection, and maternal effects in fragmented landscapes

Primary tabs

Gibbs, Melanie [UCL] Van Dyck, Hans [UCL]

Traditionally, evolutionary ecology and conservation biology have primarily been concerned with how environmental changes affect population size and genetic diversity. Recently, however, there has been a growing realization that phenotypic plasticity can have important consequences for the probability of population persistence, population growth, and evolution during rapid environmental change. Habitat fragmentation due to human activities is dramatically changing the ecological conditions of life for many organisms. In this review, we use examples from the literature to demonstrate that habitat fragmentation has important consequences on oviposition site selection in insects, with carryover effects on offspring survival and, therefore, population dynamics. We argue that plasticity in oviposition site selection and maternal effects on offspring phenotypes may be an important, yet underexplored, mechanism by which environmental conditions have consequences across generations. Without considering the impact of habitat fragmentation on oviposition site selection, it will be difficult to assess the effect of fragmentation on offspring fitness, and ultimately to understand the impact of anthropogenic-induced environmental change on population viability.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Synthèse de littérature
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2009
Language Anglais
Journal information "Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology" - Vol. 64, no. 1, p. 1-11 (2009)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer (New York)
issn 0340-5443
e-issn 1432-0762
Publication status Publié
Affiliations UCL - SC/BIOL - Département de biologie
UCL - SST/ELI/ELIB - Biodiversity
Keywords Butterfly ; Egg laying ; Host quality ; Insect ; Microclimate ; Resource distribution ; Habitat fragmentation ; Oviposition behavior ; Life history
Links
  1. Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2008) The Duke of Burgundy butterfly and its dukedom: larval niche variation in Hamearis lucina across Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 12:3–14. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9084-7
  2. Auckland JN, Debinski DM, Clark WR (2004) Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius. Ecol Entomol 29:139–149. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00581.x
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145300
  4. Badyaev AV (2009) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1125–1141. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0285
  5. Badyaev AV, Uller T (2009) Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1169–1177. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0302
  6. Baguette M, Convie I, Nève G (1996) Male density affects female spatial behaviour in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol 17:225–232
  7. Banks SC, Piggott MP, Stow AJ, Taylor AC (2007) Sex and sociality in a disconnected world: a review of the impacts of habitat fragmentation on animal social interactions. Can J Zool 85:1065–1079. doi: 10.1139/Z07-094
  8. Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18:1482–1491. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00417.x
  9. Begon M, Parker GA (1986) Should egg size and clutch size decrease with age? Oikos 47:293–302
  10. Begum S, Tsukuda R, Fujisaki K, Nakasuji F (1996) The effects of cruciferous host plants on morphology, reproductive performance and flight activity in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomentidae). Res Popul Ecol 38:257–263
  11. Bélisle M (2005) Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:1988–1995. doi: 10.1890/04-0923
  12. Benton TG, Plaistow SJ, Beckerman AP, Lapsley CT, Littlejohns S (2005) Changes in maternal investment in eggs can affect population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1351–1356. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3081
  13. BERNARDO JOSEPH, The Particular Maternal Effect of Propagule Size, Especially Egg Size: Patterns, Models, Quality of Evidence and Interpretations, 10.1093/icb/36.2.216
  14. Boggs CL (1986) Reproductive strategies of female butterflies: variation in and constraints on fecundity. Ecol Entomol 11:7–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00274.x
  15. Boggs CL (1987) Within population variation in the demography of Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Holarctic Ecol 10:175–184
  16. Boggs CL (1997) Reproductive allocation from reserves and income in butterfly species with differing adult diets. Ecology 78:181–191. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0181:RAFRAI]2.0.CO;2
  17. Boggs CL, Freeman KD (2005) Larval food limitation in butterflies: effects on adult resource allocation and fitness. Oecologia 144:353–361. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0076-6
  18. Braby MF (1994) The significance of egg size variation in butterflies in relation to host plant quality. Oikos 71:119–129
  19. Brommer JE, Fred MS (1999) Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol Entomol 24:125–131. doi: : 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00190.x
  20. Brown GP, Shine R (2009) Beyond size-number trade-offs: clutch size as a maternal effect. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1097–1106. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0247
  21. Bukovinszky T, Potting RPJ, Clough Y, van Lenteren JC, Vet LEM (2005) The role of pre- and post-alighting detection mechanisms in the responses to patch size by specialist herbivores. Oikos 109:435–446. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13707.x
  22. Cain ML, Eccleston J, Kareiva PM (1985) The influence of food-plant dispersion on caterpillar searching success. Ecol Entomol 10:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00529.x
  23. Carroll SP, Fox CW (2007) Dissecting the evolutionary impacts of plant invasions: bugs and beetles as native guides. Global Change Biol 13:1644–1657. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01403.x
  24. Carroll AL, Quiring DT (1993) Interactions between size and temperature influence fecundity and longevity of a torticid moth, Zeiraphera canadiensis. Oecologia 93:233–241. doi: 10.1007/BF00317676
  25. Clark CM, Tilman D (2008) Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451:712–715. doi: 10.1038/7179xia
  26. Crean AJ, Marshall DJ (2009) Coping with environmental uncertainty: dynamic bet hedging as a maternal effect. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1087–1096. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0237
  27. Crozier Lisa G., Field transplants reveal summer constraints on a butterfly range expansion, 10.1007/s00442-004-1634-z
  28. Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Coles S, Thomas CD (2006) Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming. J Anim Ecol 75:247–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01044.x
  29. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.043
  30. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12492.x
  31. Dethier VG (1959) Food-plant distribution and larval dispersal as factors affecting insect populations. Can Entomol 88:581–596
  32. Doak P, Kareiva P, Kingsolver J (2006) Fitness consequences of choosy oviposition for a time-limited butterfly. Ecology 87:395–408. doi: 10.1890/05-0647
  33. Dover J, Sparks T, Clarke S, Gobbett K, Glossop S (2000) Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 80:227–242. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00149-3
  34. Duckworth RA (2009) Maternal effects and range expansion: a key factor in a dynamic process? Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1075–1086. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0294
  35. Einum S, Fleming IA (2004) Environmental unpredictability and offspring size: conservative versus diversified bet-hedging. Evol Ecol Res 6:443–455
  36. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
  37. Fischer K, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003a) Fitness consequences of temperature-mediated egg size plasticity in a butterfly. Func Ecol 17:803–810. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2003.00798.x
  38. Fischer K, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003b) Plasticity in butterfly egg size: why larger offspring at lower temperatures? Ecology 84:3138–3147. doi: 10. 1890/02-0733
  39. Fischer K, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2004) Genetic and environmental sources of egg size variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 92:163–169. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800382
  40. Floater GJ (2001) Habitat complexity, spatial interference, and "minimum risk distribution": a framework for population stability. Ecol Monogr 71:447–468. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0447:HCSIAM]2.0.CO;2
  41. Fox CW, Waddell KJ, Mousseau TA (1995) Parental host plant affects offspring life histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76:402–411
  42. Fox CW, Nilsson JA, Mousseau TA (1997) The ecology of diet expansion in a seed-feeding beetle - preexisting variation, rapid adaptation and maternal effects? Evol Ecol 11:183–194
  43. Gibbs M, Breuker CJ (2006) Effect of larval rearing density on adult life-history traits and developmental stability of the dorsal eyespot pattern in speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Entomol Exp Appl 118:41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00361.x
  44. Gibbs M, Lace LA, Jones MJ, Moore AJ (2004a) Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. J Insect Sci 4:16 available online: insectscience.org/4.16
  45. Gibbs M, Lace LA, Jones MJ, Moore AJ (2004b) Differences in search behaviour of the two Madeiran speckled butterflies. Pararge aegeria and Pararge xiphia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae), implications for interspecific competition? Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal. 55:5–15
  46. Gibbs M, Lace LA, Jones MJ, Moore AJ (2005) Egg size-number trade-off and a decline in oviposition site choice quality: female Pararge aegeria butterflies pay a cost of having males present at oviposition. J Insect Sci 5:39 available online: insectscience.org/5.39
  47. Gibbs M, Lace LA, Jones MJ, Moore AJ (2006) Multiple host-plant use may arise from gender-specific fitness effects. J Insect Sci 6:04 available online: insectscience.org/6.04
  48. Ginzburg LR, Taneyhill DE (1994) Population cycles of forest Lepidoptera—a maternal effect hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 63:79–92
  49. Gonzalez-Gomez P, Estades CF, Simonetti JA (2006) Strengthened insectivory in a temperate fragmented forest. Oecologia 148:137–143. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0338-3
  50. Gotthard K (2004) Growth strategies and optimal body size in temperate Pararginii butterflies. Integr Comp Biol 44:471–479. doi: 10.1093/icb/44.6.471
  51. Gotthard K, Berger D, Walters R (2007) What keeps insects small? Time limitation during oviposition reduces the fecundity benefit of female size in a butterfly. Am Nat 169:768–779. doi: 10.1086/516651
  52. Gu H, Danthanarayana W (1992) Influence of larval rearing conditions on the body size and flight capacity of Epiphyas postvittana moths. Aust J Zool 40:573–581. doi: 10.1071/ZO9920573
  53. Gutiérrez D, Thomas CD (2000) Marginal range expansion in a host-limited butterfly species Gonepteryx rhamni. Ecol Entomol 25:165–170. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2000.00241.x
  54. Hanks LM (1999) Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annu Rev Entomol 44:483–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.483
  55. Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01024.x
  56. Harvey GT (1977) Mean weight and rearing performance of successive egg clusters of eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 109:487–496
  57. Haynes KJ, Cronin JT (2003) Matrix composition affects the spatial ecology of a prairie planthopper. Ecology 84:2856–2866. doi: 10.1890/02-0611
  58. Heard SB, Remer LC (1997) Clutch-size behavior and coexistence in ephemeral-patch competition models. Am Nat 150:744–770. doi: 10.1086/286092
  59. Hellmann JJ (2002) The effect of an environmental change on mobile butterfly larvae and the nutritional quality of their hosts. J Anim Ecol 71:925–936. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00658.x
  60. Hill JK, Hughes CL, Dytham C, Searle JB (2006) Genetic diversity in butterflies: interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and climate-driven range expansion. Biol Lett 2:152–154. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0401
  61. Hopkins RJ, Van Loon JJA (2001) The effect of host acceptability on oviposition and egg accumulation by the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae. Physiol Entomol 26:149–157. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2001.00228.x
  62. Hopper KR, Rosenheim JA, Prout T, Oppenheim SJ (2003) Within-generation bet hedging: a seductive explanation? Oikos 101:219–222. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12051.x
  63. Huang CC, Yang RL, Lee HJ, Horng SB (2005) Beyond fecundity and longevity: trade-offs between reproduction and survival mediated by behavioural responses of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Physiol Entomol 30:81–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00474.x
  64. Hughes CL, Hill JK, Dytham C (2003) Evolutionary trade-offs between reproduction and dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:S147–S150. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0049
  65. Hughes J, Hern A, Dorn S (2004) Preimaginal environment influences adult flight in Cydia molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ Entomol 33:1155–1162
  66. Inchausti P, Ginzburg LR (2009) Maternal effects mechanism of population cycling: a formidable competitor to the traditional predator-prey view. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1117–1124. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0292
  67. Jallow MF, Zalucki MP (2003) Relationship between oviposition preference and offspring performance in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner; Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 42:343–348. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.2003.00365.x
  68. Janmaat AF, Myers JH (2007) Host-plant effects the expression of resistance to Baillus thuringiensis kurstaki in Trichoplusia ni (Hubner): an important factor in resistance evolution. J Evol Biol 20:62–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01232.x
  69. Janz N, Nylin S, Wedell N (1994) Host-plant utilization in the comma butterfly - sources of variation and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 99:132–140
  70. Janz N, Bergstrom A, Sjogren A (2005) The role of nectar sources for oviposition decisions of the common blue butterfly Polyommatus icarus. Oikos 109:535–538. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13817.x
  71. Javois J, Tammaru T (2004) Reproductive decisions are sensitive to cues of life expectancy: the case of a moth. Anim Behav 68:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.022
  72. Jervis MA, Boggs CL, Ferns PN (2005) Egg maturation strategy and its associated trade-offs: a synthesis focusing on Lepidoptera. Ecol Entomol 30:359–375. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00712.x
  73. Jervis MA, Ellers J, Harvey JA (2008) Resource acquisition, allocation, and utilization in parasitoid reproductive strategies. Ann Rev Entomol 53:361–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093433
  74. Jones RE (1977) Search behaviour: a study of three caterpillar species. Behaviour 60:237–259. doi: 10.1163/156853977X00225
  75. Jones RE (2001) Mechanisms for locating resources in space and time: impacts on the abundance of insect herbivores. Austral Ecol 26:518–524. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01147.x
  76. Jones MJ, Lace LA, Harrison EC, Stevens-Wood B (1998) Territorial behaviour in the speckled wood butterflies Pararge xiphia and P. aegeria of Madeira: a mechanism for interspecific competition. Ecography 21:297–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00567.x
  77. Jones KE, Purvis A, Gittleman JL (2003) Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. Am Nat 161:601–614. doi: 10.1086/368289
  78. Johnson CG (1963) Physiological factors in insect migration by flight. Nature 198:423–427. doi: 10.1038/198423a0
  79. Karlsson B, Van Dyck H (2005) Does habitat fragmentation affect temperature-related life-history traits? A laboratory test with a woodland butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1257–1263. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3074
  80. Karlsson B, Wiklund C (1985) Egg weight variation in relation to egg mortality and starvation endurance of newly hatched larvae in some satyrid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 10:205–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00549.x
  81. Karlsson B, Wiklund C (2005) Butterfly life history and temperature adaptations; dry open habitats select for increased fecundity and longevity. J Anim Ecol 74:99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00902.x
  82. Keller I, Largiader CR (2003) Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:417–423. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2247
  83. Klok CJ, Chown SL (1999) Assessing the benefits of aggregation: thermal biology and water relations of anomalous Emperor Moth caterpillars. Func Ecol 13:417–427. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00324.x
  84. Kotiaho JS, Kaitala V, Komonen A, Paivinen J (2005) Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1963–1967. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406718102
  85. Kriska G et al (2006) Why do red and dark-coloured cars lure aquatic insects? The attraction of water insects to car paintwork explained by reflection-polarization signals. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1667–1671. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3500
  86. Kristian WB (2003) The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps. Oikos 103:457–468. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12192.x
  87. Kührt U, Samietz J, Dorn S (2006) Thermal response in adult codling moth. Physiol Entomol 31:80–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2005.00478.x
  88. LANCE DAVID R., Host-Seeking Behavior of the Gypsy Moth: The Influence of Polyphagy and Highly Apparent Host Plants, Herbivorous Insects (1983) ISBN:9780120455805 p.201-224, 10.1016/b978-0-12-045580-5.50012-4
  89. Lastra JAS, Barrios LEG, Rojas JC, Rivera HP (2006) Host selection behavior of Leptophobia aripa (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Florida Entomol 89:127–134
  90. Lawrence WS (1990) The effects of group-size and host species on development and survivorship of a gregarious caterpillar Halisidota caryae (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae). Ecol Entomol 15:53–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1990.tb00783.x
  91. Leather SR, Burnand AC (1987) Factors affecting life-history parameters of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S): the hidden costs of reproduction. Func Ecol 1:331–338
  92. Louy D, Habel JC, Schmitt T, Assmann T, Meyer M, Müller P (2007) Strongly diverging population genetic patterns of three skipper species: the role of habitat fragmentation and dispersal ability. Conserv Gen 8:671–681. doi: 10.1007/s10592-006-9213-y
  93. Mattila N, Kaitala V, Komonen A, Kotiaho JS, Paivinen J (2006) Ecological determinants of distribution decline and risk of extinction in moths. Conserv Biol 20:1161–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00404.x
  94. Marshall DJ, Uller T (2007) When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116:1957–1963. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16203.x
  95. Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417–428
  96. McKay HV (1991) Egg-laying requirements of woodland butterflies; Brimstones (Gonepteryx rhamni) and alder buckthorn (Frangula alnus). J Appl Ecol 28:731–743
  97. McVean RIK, Sait SM, Thompson DJ, Begon M (2002) Effects of resource quality on the population dynamics of the Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella and its granulovirus. Oecologia 131:71–78. doi: 10.1007/s00442-001-0862-8
  98. Merckx T, Van Dyck H (2007) Habitat fragmentation affects habitat-finding ability of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria L. Anim Behav 74:1029–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.020
  99. Mevi-Schütz J, Erhardt A (2005) Amino acids in nectar enhance butterfly fecundity: a long awaited link. Am Nat 165:411–419. doi: 10.1086/429150
  100. Minkenberg O, Tatar M, Rosenheim JA (1992) Egg load as a major source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behavior. Oikos 65:134–142
  101. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Phil Trans R Soc B– Biol Sci 363:1635–1645. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.0011
  102. Monks A, Kelly D (2003) Motivation models fail to explain oviposition behaviour in the diamondback moth. Physiol Entomol 28:199–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2003.00333.x
  103. Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Ann Rev Entomol 36:511–534. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002455
  104. Mousseau T, Fox CW (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  105. Neve G, Barascud B, Descimon H, Baguette M (2008) Gene flow rise with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). BMC Evol Biol 8:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-84
  106. Nylin Sören, Janz Niklas, Host plant preferences in the comma butterfly (Polygonia c-album): Do parents and offspring agree?, 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682344
  107. Odendaal FJ, Turchin P, Stermitz FR (1989) Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 78:283–288. doi: 10.1007/BF00377167
  108. Ostaff DP, Quiring DT (2000) Role of the host plant in the decline of populations of a specialist herbivore, the spruce bud moth. J Anim Ecol 69:263–273. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00389.x
  109. Owen DF, Shreeve TG, Smith AG (1986) Colonization of Madeira by the Speckled Wood Butterfly, Pararge aegeria (Lepidoptera, Satyridae), and its impact on the endemic Pararge xiphia. Ecol Entomol 11:349–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00312.x
  110. Papaj DR (2000) Ovarian dynamics and host use. Annu Rev Entomol 45:423–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.423
  111. Papaj DR, Rausher MD (1987) Genetic differences and phenotypic plasticity as causes of variation in oviposition preference in Battus philenor. Oecologia 74:24–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00377341
  112. Papaj DR, Mallory HS, Heinz CA (2007) Extreme weather change and the dynamics of oviposition behavior in the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. Oecologia 152:365–375. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0658-6
  113. Partecke J, Van't Hof TJ, Gwinner E (2004) Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European Blackbirds (Turdus merula): results of phenotypic plasticity or genetic differences? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:1995–2001. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2821
  114. Plaistow SJ, Benton TG (2009) The influence of context-dependent maternal effects on population dynamics: an experimental test. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1049–1058. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0251
  115. Pollard E (1988) Temperature, rainfall and butterfly numbers. J Appl Ecol 25:819–828
  116. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000) Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1947–1952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234
  117. Rabasa SG, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2005) Egg laying by a butterfly on a fragmented host plant: a multi-level approach. Ecography 28:629–639. doi: 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04229.x
  118. Rabasa S, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2008) Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas. Oecologia 156:491–503. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1008-z
  119. Räsänen K, Kruuk LEB (2007) Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Func Ecol 21:408–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01246.x
  120. Rausher MD (1979) Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 60:503–511. doi: 10.2307/1936070
  121. Rausher MD (1980) Host abundance, juvenile survival and oviposition preference in Battus philenor. Evolution 34:342–355
  122. Rausher MD (1983) Alteration of oviposition behaviour by Battus philenor butterflies in response to variation in host-plant density. Ecology 64:1028–1034. doi: 10.2307/1937810
  123. RESETARITS WILLIAM J., Oviposition Site Choice and Life History Evolution, 10.1093/icb/36.2.205
  124. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland
  125. Roitberg BD, Robertson IC, Tyerman JGA (1999) Vive la variance: a functional oviposition theory for insect herbivores. Entomol Exp Appl 91:187–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00483.x
  126. Rosenheim JA (1996) An evolutionary argument for egg limitation. Evolution 50:2089–2094
  127. Roy D. B., Thomas J. A., Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin, 10.1007/s00442-002-1121-3
  128. Thomas W. Sappington, William B. Showers, Reproductive Maturity, Mating Status, and Long-Duration Flight Behavior of Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the Conceptual Misuse of the Oogenesis'Flight Syndrome by Entomologists, 10.1093/ee/21.4.677
  129. Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02580-6
  130. Schneider C, Dover J, Fry GLA (2003) Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecol Entomol 28:219–227. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00494.x
  131. Shapiro AM (1970) The role of sexual behaviour in density-related dispersal of Pierid butterflies. Am Nat 104:367–372. doi: 10.1086/282670
  132. Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:182–211
  133. Seko T, Miyatake T, Fujioka S, Nakasuji F (2006) Genetic and environmental sources of egg size, fecundity and body size in the migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Popul Ecol 48:225–232. doi: 10.1007/s10144-006-0266-z
  134. Sevenster JG, Ellers J, Driessen G (1998) An evolutionary argument for time limitation. Evolution 52:1241–1244
  135. Springer P, Boggs CL (1986) Resource allocation to oocytes: heritable variation with altitude in Colias philodice eriphyle (Lepidoptera). Am Nat 127:252–256. doi: 10.1086/284483
  136. Stamp NE (1980) Egg deposition patterns in butterflies: why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Am Nat 115:367–380. doi: 10.1086/283567
  137. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  138. STEFANESCU Constanti, PENUELAS Josep, SARDANS Jordi, FILELLA Iolanda, Females of the specialist butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalinae: Melitaeini) select the greenest leaves of Lonicera implexa (Caprifoliaceae) for oviposition, 10.14411/eje.2006.077
  139. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2002) Insect communities and biotic interactions on fragmented calcareous grasslands - a mini review. Biol Conserv 104:275–284. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00192-6
  140. Steigenga MJ, Fischer K (2007a) Ovarian dynamics, egg size, and egg number in relation to temperature and mating status in a butterfly. Entomol Exp Appl 125:195–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00610.x
  141. Steigenga MJ, Fischer K (2007b) Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on life-history traits in a butterfly. J Therm Biol 32:396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2007.06.001
  142. Steigenga MJ, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM, Fischer K (2005) The evolutionary genetics of egg size plasticity in a butterfly. J Evol Biol 18:281–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00855.x
  143. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879. doi: 10.1126/science.1094678
  144. Tabashnik BE, Wheelock H, Rainbolt JD, Watt WB (1981) Individual variation in oviposition preference in the butterfly, Colias eurythem. Oecologia 50:225–230. doi: 10.1007/BF00348042
  145. Tammaru T, Javois J (2005) When being alive implies being safe: variation in mortality rates can cause oviposition selectivity to increase with age. Oikos 111:649–653. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2479
  146. Tammaru T, Ruohomaki K, Montola M (2000) Crowding-induced plasticity in Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): weak evidence of specific modifications in reaction norms. Oikos 90:171–181. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900117.x
  147. Tatar M (1991) Clutch size in the swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor - the role of host quality and egg load within and among seasonal flights in California. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:337–344. doi: 10.1007/BF00164383
  148. Taylor PD, Merriam G (1995) Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos 73:43–48
  149. Thomas MB, Blanford S (2003) Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 18:344–350. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00069-7
  150. Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92:563–567. doi: 10.1007/BF00317850
  151. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.000433
  152. Torres-Vila LM, Rodriguez-Molina MC (2002) Egg size variation and its relationship with larval performance in the Lepidoptera: the case of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. Oikos 99:272–283. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990207.x
  153. Travis JMJ (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:467–473. doi: 10.1098/rspb. 2002.2246
  154. Tscharntke T, Brandl R (2004) Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu Rev Entomol 49:405–430. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123339
  155. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00482.x
  156. Turlure C, Van Dyck H (2009) On the consequences of aggressive male mate-locating behaviour and microclimate for female host plant use in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(11): 1581-1591
  157. Uller T (2008) Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005
  158. Valladares G, Salvo A, Cagnolo L (2006) Habitat fragmentation effects on trophic processes of insect-plant food webs. Conserv Biol 20:212–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00337.x
  159. Vandergast AG, Bohonak AJ, Weissman DB, Fisher RN (2007) Understanding the genetic effects of recent habitat fragmentation in the context of evolutionary history: phylogeography and landscape genetics of a southern California endemic Jerusalem cricket (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae: Stenopelmatus). Mol Ecol 16:977–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03216.x
  160. Van Dyck H, Matthysen E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing “design” in a changing landscape? Trends Ecol Evol 14:172–174. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01610-9
  161. Wedell N, Nylin S, Janz N (1997) Effects of larval host plant and sex on the propensity to enter diapause in the comma butterfly. Oikos 78:569–575
  162. Wellington WG (1965) Some maternal influences on progeny quality in the western tent caterpillar Malacosoma plunale (Dyar). Can Entomol 97:1–14
  163. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  164. Wheeler D (1996) The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annu Rev Entomol 41:407–431. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002203
  165. Wickman P-O (1986) Courtship solicitation by females of the small heath butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) and their behaviour in relation to male territories before and after copulation. Anim Behav 34:153–157. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(86)90017-5
  166. Wickman P-O, Karlsson B (1987) Changes in egg color, egg weight and oviposition rate with the number of eggs laid by wild females of the small heath butterfly, Coenonympha pamphilus. Ecol Entomol 12:109–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1987.tb00989.x
  167. Wiklund C, Karlsson B (1984) Egg size variation in satyrid butterflies: adaptive vs. historical, “Bauplan”, and mechanistic explanations. Oikos 43:391–400
  168. Wiklund C, Persson A (1983) Fecundity, egg wight variation and its relation to offspring fitness in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria, or why don't butterfly females lay more eggs? Oikos 40:53–63
  169. Wiklund C, Karlsson B, Forsberg J (1987) Adaptive versus constraint explanations for egg-to-body size relationships in two butterfly families. Am Nat 130:828–838. doi: 10.1086/284750
  170. Yamamura K (1999) Relation between plant density and arthropod density in cabbage. Res Popul Ecol 41:177–182
  171. Zalucki MP, Clarke AR, Malcolm SB (2002) Ecology and behavior of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 47:361–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145220
  172. Zschokke S, Dolt C, Rusterholz HP, Oggier P, Braschler B, Thommen GH, Ludin E, Erhardt A, Baur B (2000) Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia 125:559–572. doi: 10.1007/s004420000483
Bibliographic reference Gibbs, Melanie ; Van Dyck, Hans. Reproductive plasticity, oviposition site selection, and maternal effects in fragmented landscapes. In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 64, no. 1, p. 1-11 (2009)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/35237