User menu

Optimal tax policy and expected longevity: a mean and variance utility approach

Bibliographic reference Leroux, Marie-Louise. Optimal tax policy and expected longevity: a mean and variance utility approach. In: International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 16, no. 4, p. 514-537 (Août 2009)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/28501
  1. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica, 21(4), 503–546.
  2. Becker, G., & Philipson, T. (1998). Old-age longevity and mortality contingent claims. The Journal of Political Economy, 106(3), 551–573.
  3. Becker, G., Philipson, T., & Soares, R. (2005). The quantity and the quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 277–291.
  4. Bell David E., Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty, 10.1287/opre.33.1.1
  5. Bommier, A. (2006). Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. International Economic Review, 47(4), 1223–1246.
  6. Bommier, A., Leroux, M.-L., & Lozachmeur, J.-M. (2007). Uncertain lifetime, redistribution and nonlinear pricing of annuities (Working Paper).
  7. Broome, J. (2004). Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Hagen, O. (1979). Towards a positive theory of preferences under risk. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  9. Halek, M., & Eisenhauer, J. (2001). Demography of risk aversion. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), 1–24.
  10. Kaplan, G. A., Seeman, T. E., Cohen, R. D., Knudsen, L. P., & Guralnik, J. (1987). Mortality among the elderly in the Alameda county study: behavioral and demographic risk factors. American Journal of Public Health, 77(3), 307–312.
  11. Leroux, M. L. (2008). Endogenous differential mortality, non monitored effort and optimal non linear taxation (CORE DP 29).
  12. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1987). Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 41(2), 270–287.
  13. Machina, M. (1983). Generalized expected utility analysis and the nature of observed violations of the independence axiom. In B. Stigum & F. Wenstøp (Eds.), Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  14. Machina, M. (2007). Non-expected utility theory. In S. Durlauf & L. Blume (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  15. Mosteller, F., & Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 371–404.
  16. Múnera, H., & de Neufville, R. (1983). A decision analysis model when the substitution principle is not acceptable. In B. P. Stigum & F. Wenstop (Eds.), Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  17. OECD (2007). Eco-Santé OCDE 2007, available online at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/20/38980771.pdf .
  18. Poikolainen, K., & Escola, J. (1986). The effect of health services on mortality decline in death rates from amenable to non-amenable causes in Finland, 1969–1981. The Lancet, 1(8474), 199–202.
  19. Schmidt, U. (2004). Alternatives to expected utility: some formal theories. In S. Barbera, P. J. Hammond, & C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory, Vol II. Boston: Kluwer, Chap. 15.
  20. Sheshinski, E. (2007). The economic theory of annuities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  21. Solomon, C., & Manson, J. E. (1997). Obesity and mortality: a review of the epidemiological data. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66(4), 1044–1050.
  22. Starmer Chris, Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk, 10.1257/jel.38.2.332
  23. Stigum, B. P., & Wenstop, F. (Eds.). (1983). Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.