Pence, Charles H.
[UCL]
Swaim, Daniel G.
We argue that the economy of nature constitutes an invocation of structure in the biological sciences, one largely missed by philosophers of biology despite the turn in recent years toward structural explanations throughout the philosophy of science. We trace a portion of the history of this concept, beginning with the theologically and economically grounded work of Linnaeus, moving through Darwin’s adaptation of the economy of nature and its reconstitution in genetic terms during the first decades of the Modern Synthesis. What this historical case study reveals, we argue, is a window into the shifting landscape of the explanatory and ontic uses of structural concepts. In Linnaeus, the economy of nature has both ontic and explanatory import; in Darwin the ontic and explanatory aspects start to come apart (with the explanatory aspect being foregrounded); and finally, in the Modern Synthesis, the economy of nature is replaced by the conceptual toolkit of population genetics, the structural elements of which are nearly entirely explanatory. Having traced a historical trajectory of structural concepts that moves from an ontic formulation to an increasingly explanatory one, we conclude by outlining some insights for structural realism.
- Bokulich Alisa, Fiction As a Vehicle for Truth: Moving Beyond the Ontic Conception, 10.1093/monist/onw004
- Bouchard, F., & Huneman, P. (Eds.). (2013). From groups to individuals: Evolution and emerging individuality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Darwin, C. (1838a). “Books to Be Read” and “Books Read” Notebook (1838–1851). CUL-DAR119. Edited by Kees Rookmaker. URL:
http://darwin-online.org.uk/
: Darwin Online.
- Darwin, C. (1838b). Notebook E: [Transmutation of Species (10.1838–7.1839)]. CUL-DAR124. Edited by Kees Rookmaker. URL:
http://darwin-online.org.uk/
: Darwin Online.
- Darwin, C. (1838c). Notebook N: [Metaphysics and Expression (1838–1839)]. CUL-DAR126. Edited by Kees Rookmaker. URL:
http://darwin-online.org.uk/
: Darwin Online.
- Darwin, C. (1858). Letter to J. D. Hooker. “Letter 2282 – Darwin, C. R. to Hooker, J. D., 8 [Jun. 1858],” June 8.
https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/entry-2282
.
- Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. 1st ed. London: John Murray.
- Darwin, C. (1860). On the origin of species. 2nd ed. London: John Murray.
- Darwin, C. (1909). The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays Written in 1842 and 1844. Edited by Francis Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- van Fraassen Bas C., Structure: Its Shadow and Substance, 10.1093/bjps/axl002
- French Steven, The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence, 10.1007/s11229-010-9734-2
- French Steven, Shifting to structures in physics and biology: A prophylactic for promiscuous realism, 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.023
- French Steven, The Structure of the World : Metaphysics and Representation, ISBN:9780199684847, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001
- French, S., & McKenzie, K. (2012). Thinking outside the toolbox: Towards a more productive engagement between metaphysics and philosophy of physics. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 8(1), 42–59.
- Gale Barry G., Darwin and the Concept of a Struggle for Existence: A Study in the Extrascientific Origins of Scientific Ideas, 10.1086/350940
- Godfrey-Smith Peter, Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, ISBN:9780199552047, 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199552047.001.0001
- Hodge M. J. S., Capitalist Contexts for Darwinian Theory: Land, Finance, Industry and Empire, 10.1007/s10739-009-9187-y
- Hodge Jonathan, The notebook programmes and projects of Darwin’s London years, The Cambridge Companion to Darwin ISBN:9781139002370 p.44-72, 10.1017/ccol9780521884754.003
- Hodge Jonathan, Darwinism after Mendelism: the case of Sewall Wright’s intellectual synthesis in his shifting balance theory of evolution (1931), 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.008
- Ishida Yoichi, Sewall Wright, shifting balance theory, and the hardening of the modern synthesis, 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.11.001
- Jackson Myles W., Natural and Artificial Budgets: Accounting for Goethe's Economy of Nature, 10.1017/s0269889700001769
- Koerner, L. (1999). Linnaeus: Nature and nation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Kohn, D. (2009). Darwin’s keystone: The principle of divergence. In M. Ruse & R. J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species,” (pp. 87–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ladyman James, What is structural realism?, 10.1016/s0039-3681(98)80129-5
- Ladyman James, Ross Don, with John Collier and David Spurrett, Every Thing Must Go, ISBN:9780199276196, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001
- Linnaeus, C. (1762). Miscellaneous Tracts Relating to Natural History, Husbandry, and Physick. Edited by Benjamin Stillingfleet. 2nd ed. London: R. and J. Dodsley.
- Linnaeus, C. (1763). “Skaparens afsikt med naturens verk. En promotionsföreläsning af Linné.” Edited and translated by Arvid Hj. Uggla. SLÅ XXX (1947), 71–96.
- Linnaeus, C. (1781). In F. J. Brand (Ed.), Select dissertations from the Amoenitates Academicae (Vol. 1). London: G. Robinson.
- Mayr, E. (1966). Animal species and evolution. Belknap: Cambridge.
- Mayr Ernst, Darwin's principle of divergence, 10.1007/bf00351996
- McMullin, E. (1984). A case for scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific Realism (pp. 8–40). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Morrison M., Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry, 10.1093/bjps/53.1.39
- Morrison Margaret, Fictional models in science, 10.1088/2058-7058/27/02/39
- Ospovat, D. (1981). The development of Darwin’s theory: Natural history, natural theology, and natural selection (pp. 1838–1859). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pearce Trevor, “A Great Complication of Circumstances” – Darwin and the Economy of Nature, 10.1007/s10739-009-9205-0
- Pigliucci Massimo, DO WE NEED AN EXTENDED EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS?, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x
- Priest Greg, Charles Darwin’s Theory of Moral Sentiments: What Darwin’s Ethics Really Owes to Adam Smith, 10.1353/jhi.2017.0032
- Radick Gregory, Is the theory of natural selection independent of its history?, The Cambridge Companion to Darwin ISBN:9781139002370 p.147-172, 10.1017/ccol9780521884754.007
- Ramsey Grant, Pence Charles H., evoText: A new tool for analyzing the biological sciences, 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.003
- Rausing L., Underwriting the Oeconomy: Linnaeus on Nature and Mind, 10.1215/00182702-35-suppl_1-173
- Reill, P. H. (2005). Vitalizing nature in the enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Richards Robert J., The Romantic Conception of Life : Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe, ISBN:9780226712116, 10.7208/chicago/9780226712185.001.0001
- Rohwer Yasha, Rice Collin, How are Models and Explanations Related?, 10.1007/s10670-015-9788-0
- Ruse, M. (2009). The origin of the Origin. In M. Ruse & R. J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species,” (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schabas M., Adam Smith's Debts to Nature, 10.1215/00182702-35-suppl_1-262
- Schabas Margaret, The Natural Origins of Economics, ISBN:9780226735702, 10.7208/chicago/9780226735719.001.0001
- Stauffer, R. C. (1960). Ecology in the long manuscript version of Darwin’s ‘Origin of Species’ and Linnaeus’ “Oeconomy of Nature”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104(2), 235–241.
- Valen Leigh Van, Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks, 10.2307/1219444
- Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Species: A history of the idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Worrall John, Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?, 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
- Worster, D. (1977). Nature’s economy: The roots of ecology. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
- Wright, S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics, 1, 356–366.
Bibliographic reference |
Pence, Charles H. ; Swaim, Daniel G.. The economy of nature: the structure of evolution in Linnaeus, Darwin, and the modern synthesis. In: European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, no.3, p. 435-454 (2017) |
Permanent URL |
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/202856 |