User menu

The time limit on copyright: an unlikely tragedy of the intellectual commons

Bibliographic reference Lambrecht, Maxime. The time limit on copyright: an unlikely tragedy of the intellectual commons. In: European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 43, no. 3, p. p. 475–494 (2017)
Permanent URL
  1. Abramowicz, M. (2011). A new uneasy case for copyright. George Washington Law Review, 79(6), 2013–2087.
  2. Aldred, J. (2010). Copyright and the limits of law-and-economics analysis. In L. Bently, J. Davis, & J. C. Ginsburg (Eds.), Copyright and piracy: An interdisciplinary critique. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Anderson, C. (2008). The long tail (Revised ed.). Paris: Hachette Books.
  4. Attas, D. (2008). Lockean justifications of intellectual property. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice (pp. 29–56). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Benkler, Y. (1999). Free as the air to common use: First amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain. New York University Law Review, 74, 354.
  6. Breyer Stephen, The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs, 10.2307/1339714
  7. Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2009). Market structure and property rights in open source industries. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 30, 325.
  8. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265.
  9. Bu, W., Buccafusco, C., & Heald P. J. (2016). Testing tarnishment in trademark and copyright law: The effect of pornographic versions of protected marks and works. University Washington Law Review.
  10. Buccafusco, C., & Heald, P. J. (2013). Do bad things happen when works enter the public domain: Empirical tests of copyright term extension. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 28, 1.
  11. Campbell David, Picciotto Sol, The Acceptable Face of Intervention: Intellectual Property in Posnerian Law and Economics, 10.1177/0964663906066895
  12. Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
  13. Demsetz Harold, Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint, 10.1086/466657
  14. Federation of European Publishers. (2015). European Book Publishing Statistics 2013.
  15. Frischmann, B. M. (2008). Evaluating the Demsetzian trend in copyright law. Review of Law and Economics, 3(3), 649–677.
  16. Goldstein, P. (1994). Copyright’s highway. New York: Hill & Wang.
  17. The Tragedy of the Commons, 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  18. Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth: An independent report. London: UK Intellectual Property Office.
  19. Heald, P. J. (2008). Property rights and the efficient exploitation of copyrighted works: An empirical analysis of public domain and copyrighted fiction bestsellers. Minnesota Law Review, 92(4), 1031–1063.
  20. Heald, P. J. (2009). Does the song remain the same? An empirical study of bestselling musical compositions (1913–1932) and their use in cinema (1968–2007). Case Western Reserve Law Review, 60(1), 1–44.
  21. Himma Kenneth, The legitimacy of protecting intellectual property rights : The irrelevance of two conceptions of an information commons, 10.1108/jices-10-2013-0041
  22. Hughes, J. (1998). Recoding intellectual property and overlooked audience interests. Texas Law Review, 77, 923.
  23. Hunter, P. G. (2011). The malleability of music preferences: Effects of individual differences and the listening context (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
  24. Karjala, D. S. (1998). Statement of Copyright and Intellectual Property Law Professors in Opposition to H.R. 604, H.R. 2589, and S. 505, The Copyright Term Extension Act, Sub-mitted to the Joint Committees of the Judiciary.
  25. Karjala, D. S. (2005). Congestion externalities and extended copyright protection. Georgetown Law Journal, 94, 1065.
  26. Kitch Edmund W., The Nature and Function of the Patent System, 10.1086/466903
  27. Knight F. H., Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost, 10.2307/1884592
  28. Laffont J.J., externalities, 10.1057/9780230226203.0537
  29. Lambrecht Maxime, On Water Drinkers and Magical Springs: Challenging the Lockean Proviso as a Justification for Copyright : On Water Drinkers and Magical Springs, 10.1111/raju.12098
  30. Landes William M., Posner Richard A., An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 10.1086/468150
  31. Landes, W., & Posner, R. A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  32. Lemley, M. A. (2004) Ex ante versus ex post justifications for intellectual property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71(1), 129–149.
  33. Lemley, M. A. (2005). Property, intellectual property, and free riding. Texas Law Review, 83, 1031–1075.
  34. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (2005). Seventeen famous economists weigh in on copyright: The role of theory, empirics, and network effects. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 18(2), 435–457.
  35. Merges Robert P., Justifying Intellectual Property : , ISBN:9780674061125, 10.4159/harvard.9780674061125
  36. Netanel Neil Weinstock, Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society, 10.2307/797212
  37. Netanel Neil W., Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, 10.2139/ssrn.468180
  38. Posner, R. A. (1998). Economic analysis of law (5th ed.). New York: Aspen Law & Business.
  39. Posner Richard A, Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach, 10.1257/0895330054048704
  40. Schellenberg E. Glenn, Peretz Isabelle, Vieillard Sandrine, Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure, 10.1080/02699930701350753
  41. Schroeder, J. L. (2005). Unnatural rights: Hegel and intellectual property. University of Miami Law Review, 60, 453.
  42. Sterk, S. E. (2005). Intellectualizing property: The tenuous connections between land and copyright. Washington University Law Quarterly, 83, 417.
  43. Thorpe, J. (2004). Some challenges for copyright-related quantification. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 1(1), 41–50.
  44. Totah, S. J. (1987). Copyright law-in defense of parody. Golden Gate University Law Review, 17, 57.
  45. Tushnet, R. (1997). Legal fictions: Copyright, fan fiction, and a new common law. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 17, 651.
  46. Tushnet, R. (2005) Indefinitely Renewable Copyright: Batman versus the Utility Monster. Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log.
  47. Waldron, J. (1993). From authors to copiers: Individual rights and social values in intellectual property. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68, 841–887.
  48. Zajonc R. B., Crandall Rick, Kail Robert V., Swap Walter, Effect of Extreme Exposure Frequencies on Different Affective Ratings of Stimuli, 10.2466/pms.1974.38.2.667
  49. Eveleth, R. (2014). The Star Wars George Lucas Doesn't Want You To See. The Atlantic. Aug. 27. .