Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain
MR imaging of hypervascular liver tumors: timing optimization during the arterial phase
Primary tabs
- Van Beers B, Demeure R, Pringot J, Defalque D, Geubel A, Gigot J F, Jamart J, Dynamic spin-echo imaging with Gd-DTPA: value in the differentiation of hepatic tumors., 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2154913
- Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Kroeker M A, Greenberg H M, Simm F C, Minuk G Y, Kroeker R M, Micflikier A B, Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T., 10.1148/radiology.184.3.1324509
- Oi H, Murakami T, Kim T, Matsushita M, Kishimoto H, Nakamura H, Dynamic MR imaging and early-phase helical CT for detecting small intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma., 10.2214/ajr.166.2.8553950
- Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Yi T, Ogata I, Nishiharu T, Urata J, Takahashi M, Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver., 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657948
- Peterson M S, Baron R L, Murakami T, Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging., 10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888220
- Mitchell, MRI Clin North Am, 4, 37 (1996)
- Prince M R, Chenevert T L, Foo T K, Londy F J, Ward J S, Maki J H, Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta., 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122376
- Earls J P, Rofsky N M, DeCorato D R, Krinsky G A, Weinreb J C, Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: optimization with a test examination and a power injector., 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988222
- Cherqui, Hepatology, 22, 1674 (1995)
- Frederick M G, McElaney B L, Singer A, Park K S, Paulson E K, McGee S G, Nelson R C, Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?, 10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633437
- Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Fischer U, Mueller D W, Oestmann J W, Grabbe E, Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material., 10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888218
- Silverman P M, O'Malley J, Tefft M C, Cooper C, Zeman R K, Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning., 10.2214/ajr.164.3.7863882
- Hany, J Magn Reson Imaging, 7, 551 (1997)
- Willems, Am J Cardiol, 27, 155 (1971)
- Korosec, Magn Reson Med, 36, 345 (1996)
- Harvey, Magn Reson Med, 35, 80 (1996)
- Foo T K, Saranathan M, Prince M R, Chenevert T L, Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography., 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122407
- Wilman A H, Riederer S J, King B F, Debbins J P, Rossman P J, Ehman R L, Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries., 10.1148/radiology.205.1.9314975
- Earls J P, Rofsky N M, DeCorato D R, Krinsky G A, Weinreb J C, Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector., 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939219
- Kim J K, Farb R I, Wright G A, Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography., 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423685
- Yoshikawa, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 16, 206 (1992)
- Marchal, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 16, 690 (1992)
- Lacomis J M, Baron R L, Oliver J H, Nalesnik M A, Federle M P, Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns., 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122423
Bibliographic reference | Van Beers, Bernard ; Materne, Roland ; Lacrosse, Marc ; Jamart, Jacques ; Smith, Anne M. ; et. al. MR imaging of hypervascular liver tumors: timing optimization during the arterial phase. In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 9, no. 4, p. 562-567 (1999) |
---|---|
Permanent URL | http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/8268 |