User menu

Causative 'get' and 'have'. So close, so different

Bibliographic reference Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. Causative 'get' and 'have'. So close, so different. In: Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 31, no. 2, p. 125-148 (2003)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/75813
  1. Fontenelle T., A BILINGUAL LEXICAL DATABASE FOR FRAME SEMANTICS, 10.1093/ijl/13.4.232
  2. Gilquin Gaëtanelle, Automatic retrieval of syntactic structures: The quest for the Holy Grail, 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.03gil
  3. Hantson, André. 1981. The Syntax of English and French Causative Constructions. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 13:149-173.
  4. Kastovsky, Dieter. 1973. Causatives. Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy 10:255-315.
  5. KEMMER SUZANNE, VERHAGEN ARIE, The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events, 10.1515/cogl.1994.5.2.115
  6. Lukmani, Yasmeen. 1979. To Have or Not to Have a have: A Study in the Semantics of have. Indian Linguistics 40 (4): 253-282.
  7. Pander Maat, Henk, and Liesbeth Degand. 2001. Scaling Causal Relations and Connectives in Terms of Speaker Involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (3): 211-245.
  8. Ritter Elizabeth, Rosen Sara Thomas, The function of have, 10.1016/s0024-3841(96)00024-1
  9. Schönefeld, Doris. 1999. Corpus Linguistics and Cognitivism. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4 (1): 131-171.
  10. Verhagen Arie, Kemmer Suzanne, Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch, 10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00003-3