Lories, Danielle
[UCL]
It is sometimes claimed that Husserl’s writings provide an inspiration for considering art today. More specifically we ask here whether Husserl’s description of aesthetic attitude is rich and original. The comparisons he draws between the aesthetic attitude and the phenomenological attitude always aim to clarify the phenomenological attitude and thus take it for granted that the typical features of the aesthetic attitude are well known. In this way Husserl presupposes and retrieves the teaching of Kant, although in certain working notes he clarifies and intensifies the formal and reflective characteristics of Kant’s description of the aesthetic judgment.
Bibliographic reference |
Lories, Danielle. Remarks on Aesthetic Intentionality: Husserl or Kant. In: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 31-49 (2006) |
Permanent URL |
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/75561 |