User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Thematic accuracy assessment of geographic object-based image classification

Primary tabs

Radoux, Julien [UCL] Bogaert, Patrick [UCL] Fasbender, Dominique [UCL] Defourny, Pierre [UCL]

Geographic object-based image analysis is an image-processing method where groups of spatially adjacent pixels are classified as if they were behaving as a whole unit. This approach raises concerns about the way subsequent validation studies must be conducted. Indeed, classical point-based sampling strategies based on the spatial distribution of sample points (using systematic, probabilistic or stratified probabilistic sampling) do not rely on the same concept of objects and may prove to be less appropriate than the methods explicitly built on the concept of objects used for the classification step. In this study, an original object-based sampling strategy is compared with other approaches used in the literature for the thematic accuracy assessment of object-based classifications. The new sampling scheme and sample analysis are founded on a sound theoretical framework based on few working hypotheses. The performance of the sampling strategies is quantified using simulated object-based classifications results of a Quickbird imagery. The bias and the variance of the overall accuracy estimates were used as indicators of the method's benefits. The main advantage of the object-based predictor of the overall accuracy is its performance: for a given confidence interval, it requires fewer sampling units than the other methods. In many cases, this can help to noticeably reduce the sampling effort. Beyond the efficiency, more conceptual differences between point-based and object-based samplings are discussed. First, geolocation errors do not influence the object-based thematic accuracy as they do for point-based accuracy. These errors need to be addressed independently to provide the geolocation precision. Second, the response design is more complex in object-based accuracy assessment. This is interesting for complex classes but might be an issue in case of large segmentation errors. Finally, there is a larger likelihood to reach the minimum sample size for each class with an object-based sampling than in a point-based sampling. Further work is necessary to reach the same suitability than point-based sampling for pixel-based classification, but this pioneer study shows that object-based sampling could be implemented within a statistically sound framework.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2011
Language Anglais
Journal information "International Journal of Geographical Information Science" - Vol. 25, no. 6, p. 895-911 (2011)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd. ((United Kingdom) Abingdon)
issn 1365-8816
e-issn 1365-8824
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SST/ELI/ELIE - Environmental Sciences
Keywords GEOBIA ; overall accuracy ; quality assessment ; image-object ; validation
Links
  1. Baatz M., Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung XII, 12 (2000)
  2. Bian Ling, The representation of the environment in the context of individual-based modeling, 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00298-3
  3. Bian Ling, Object-Oriented Representation of Environmental Phenomena: Is Everything Best Represented as an Object?, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00535.x
  4. Blaschke T., Object-based image analysis: spatial concepts for knowledge driven remote sensing applications. 1st Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (2008)
  5. Bontemps Sophie, Bogaert Patrick, Titeux Nicolas, Defourny Pierre, An object-based change detection method accounting for temporal dependences in time series with medium to coarse spatial resolution, 10.1016/j.rse.2008.03.013
  6. Carleer A.P., Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71, 1285 (2005)
  7. Congalton R.G., Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 54, 587 (1988)
  8. Congalton Russell G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b
  9. Congalton R.G., Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 59, 641 (1993)
  10. Congalton R.G., Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices (2009)
  11. Desclée Baudouin, Bogaert Patrick, Defourny Pierre, Forest change detection by statistical object-based method, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.013
  12. Di Gregorio A., GCP/RAF/287/ITA Africover-East Africa Project and Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service, Food and Agriculture Organization, 209 (2000)
  13. FOODY G. M., Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data, 10.1080/01431169608948706
  14. Foody Giles M., Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, 10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00295-4
  15. Franklin Steven E, Peddle Derek R, Wilson Bradley A, Blodgett Clayton F, Pixel sampling of remotely sensed digital imagery, 10.1016/0098-3004(91)90059-m
  16. George T., Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, 839 (1986)
  17. Guigues Laurent, Cocquerez Jean Pierre, Le Men Hervé, Scale-Sets Image Analysis, 10.1007/s11263-005-6299-0
  18. HAMMOND T. O., VERBYLA D. L., Optimistic bias in classification accuracy assessment, 10.1080/01431169608949085
  19. Hay G.J., Object-based image analysis, 91 (2008)
  20. Kayitakire F., Hamel C., Defourny P., Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.022
  21. Lang S., Object-based image analysis for remote sensing applications: modeling reality – dealing with complexity, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ISBN:9783540770572 p.3-27, 10.1007/978-3-540-77058-9_1
  22. Neubert M., Herold H., Meinel G., Assessing image segmentation quality – concepts, methods and application, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ISBN:9783540770572 p.769-784, 10.1007/978-3-540-77058-9_42
  23. Plourde L., Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 289 (2003)
  24. Powell R.L, Matzke N, de Souza C, Clark M, Numata I, Hess L.L, Roberts D.A, Sources of error in accuracy assessment of thematic land-cover maps in the Brazilian Amazon, 10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.007
  25. RADOUX J, DEFOURNY P, A quantitative assessment of boundaries in automated forest stand delineation using very high resolution imagery, 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.031
  26. Scarpa G., Gaetano R., Haindl M., Zerubia J., Hierarchical Multiple Markov Chain Model for Unsupervised Texture Segmentation, 10.1109/tip.2009.2020534
  27. Smith Jonathan H, Stehman Stephen V, Wickham James D, Yang Limin, Effects of landscape characteristics on land-cover class accuracy, 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00126-8
  28. Stehman Stephen V., Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy, 10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00083-7
  29. Stehman Stephen V., Czaplewski Raymond L., Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment, 10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00010-8
  30. Stow Douglas, Hamada Yuki, Coulter Lloyd, Anguelova Zlatina, Monitoring shrubland habitat changes through object-based change identification with airborne multispectral imagery, 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.011
  31. Strahler A.H., GOFC-GOLD Report, 25, 1 (2006)
  32. Tatem A.J., Noor A.M., Hay S.I., Assessing the accuracy of satellite derived global and national urban maps in Kenya, 10.1016/j.rse.2005.02.001
  33. Thomlinson John R, Bolstad Paul V, Cohen Warren B, Coordinating Methodologies for Scaling Landcover Classifications from Site-Specific to Global, 10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00055-3
  34. Warren S.D., Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 56, 333 (1990)
  35. Wulder Michael A, White Joanne C, Luther Joan E, Strickland Guy, Remmel Tarmo K, Mitchell Scott W, Use of vector polygons for the accuracy assessment of pixel-based land cover maps, 10.5589/m06-023
Bibliographic reference Radoux, Julien ; Bogaert, Patrick ; Fasbender, Dominique ; Defourny, Pierre. Thematic accuracy assessment of geographic object-based image classification. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 25, no. 6, p. 895-911 (2011)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/73137