User menu

A critical analysis of the independence of the internal audit function: evidence from Australia

Bibliographic reference Christopher, Joe ; Leung, Philomena ; Sarens, Gerrit. A critical analysis of the independence of the internal audit function: evidence from Australia. In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 22, no. 2, p. 200-220 (2009)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/70480
  1. Adams Michael B., Agency Theory and the Internal Audit, 10.1108/02686909410071133
  2. Bou‐Raad Giselle, Internal auditors and a value‐added approach: the new business regime, 10.1108/02686900010322461
  3. Brody Richard G., Lowe D. Jordan, The New Role of the Internal Auditor: Implications for Internal Auditor Objectivity, 10.1111/1099-1123.00311
  4. Chapman, C. (2001), “Raising the BAR‐ newly revised standards for the professional practice of internal auditing”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 58 No. 21, pp. 55‐61.
  5. COHEN JEFFREY, KRISHNAMOORTHY GANESH, WRIGHT ARNOLD M., Corporate Governance and the Audit Process, 10.1506/983m-epxg-4y0r-j9yk
  6. DiMaggio Paul J., Powell Walter W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, 10.2307/2095101
  7. Drent, D. (2002), “The duest for increased relevance: internal auditors who successfully communicate and balance their needs and those of their clients can increase their relevance to the organisation”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 49‐54.
  8. Goodwin Jenny, The Relationship Between the Audit Committee and the Internal Audit Function: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand, 10.1046/j.1099-1123.2003.00074.x
  9. Goodwin Jenny, Yeo Teck Yeow, Two Factors Affecting Internal Audit Independence and Objectivity: Evidence from Singapore, 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00329.x
  10. Gramling, A.A. (2004), “Role of the internal audit function in corporate governance: a synthesis of the extant internal auditing literature and directions for future research”,Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 23, pp. 194‐244.
  11. Gwilliam, D. and Kilcommins, M. (1998), “The impact of audit firm size and audit committee on perceptions of audit independence and financial statement reliability in Ireland”,The Irish Accounting Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 23‐56.
  12. HANSEN STEPHEN C., Designing Internal Controls: The Interaction between Efficiency Wages and Monitoring, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00522.x
  13. IIA Professional Guidance (2002), “Recommendation for improving corporate governance”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 59 No. 3, p. 68.
  14. Jensen Michael C., Meckling William H., Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
  15. Kalbers, L. (1992), “Audit committees and internal auditors”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 24‐6.
  16. Kiesler Sara, Sproull Lee S., Response Effects in the Electronic Survey, 10.1086/268992
  17. Krishnan Jayanthi, Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis, 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649
  18. McHugh, J. and Raghunandan, K. (1994), “Hiring and firing the chief internal auditor”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 34‐40.
  19. Meyer John W., Rowan Brian, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, 10.1086/226550
  20. Nagy Albert L., Cenker William J., An assessment of the newly defined internal audit function, 10.1108/02686900210419912
  21. Paolo Anthony M., Bonaminio Giulia A., Gibson Cheryl, Partridge Ty, Kallail Ken, Response Rate Comparisons of E-Mail- and Mail-Distributed Student Evaluations, 10.1207/s15328015tlm1202_4
  22. Raghunandan K., Rama Dasaratha V., Read William J., Audit Committee Composition, “Gray Directors,” and Interaction with Internal Auditing, 10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.105
  23. Sarens Gerrit, De Beelde Ignace, The Relationship between Internal Audit and Senior Management: A Qualitative Analysis of Expectations and Perceptions, 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2006.00351.x
  24. Scarbrough, D.P., Rama, D.V. and Raghunandan, K. (1998), “Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence”,Accounting Horizons, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51‐62.
  25. Schneider, A. and Wilner, N. (1990), “A test of audit deterrent to financial reporting irregularities using the randomized response technique”,The Accounting Review, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 668‐81.
  26. Scott W. Richard, The Adolescence of Institutional Theory, 10.2307/2392880
  27. Swoboda Walter J., Mühlberger Nikolai, Weitkunat Rolf, Schneeweiß Sebastian, Internet Surveys by Direct Mailing : An Innovative Way of Collecting Data, 10.1177/089443939701500302
  28. Turley Stuart, Zaman Mahbub, The Corporate Governance Effects of Audit Committees, 10.1007/s10997-004-1110-5
  29. Yun Gi Woong, Trumbo Craig W., Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00112.x
  30. COUPER M. P., TRAUGOTT M. W., LAMIAS M. J., Web Survey Design and Administration, 10.1086/322199
  31. Gramling, A.A. (1999), “External auditors reliance on work performed by internal auditors: the influence of fee pressure on this reliance decision”,Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 18, Supplement, pp. 117‐35.
  32. Krogstad, J., Ridley, A. and Rittenberg, L. (1999), “Where are we going”,Internal Auditor, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 27‐33.
  33. Raghunandan, K. and McHugh, J.A. (1994), “Internal audit independence and interaction with audit committees: challenges of form and substance”,Advances in Accounting, Vol. 12, pp. 313‐33.