User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

New Requirements for Modelling How Humans Succeed and Fail in Complex Traffic Scenarios

Primary tabs

Lu uml dtke, A.

In this text aspects of human decision making in complex traffic environments are described and requirements for cognitive models that shall be used as virtual test pilots or test drivers for new assistance concepts are derived. Assistance systems are an accepted means to support humans in complex traffic environments. There is a growing consensus that cognitive models can be used to test systems from a human factors perspective. The text describes the current state of cognitive architectures and argues that though very relevant achievements have been realized some important characteristics of human decision making have so far been neglected: humans use environment and time dependent heuristics. An extension of the typical cognitive cycle prevalent in extant models is suggested.

Document type Communication à un colloque (Conference Paper) – Présentation orale avec comité de sélection
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2010
Conference "Human Error, Safety and Systems Development. 7th IFIP WG 13.5 Working Conference, HESSD 2009", Brussels, Belgium (23-25 September 2009)
Peer reviewed yes
Host document Palanque, P.; Vanderdonckt, J.; Winckler, M.; ; "Human Error, Safety and Systems Development. 7th IFIP WG 13.5 Working Conference, HESSD 2009"- p. 1-17 (ISBN : 978-3-642-11749-7)
Publisher Springer-verlag
Affiliation UCL
Links
  1. Aasman, J.: Modelling Driver Behaviour in Soar. KPN Research, Leidschendam (1995)
  2. Anderson, J.R., Bower, G.: Human associative memory. Winston & Sons, Washington (1973)
  3. Anderson John R., Bothell Daniel, Byrne Michael D., Douglass Scott, Lebiere Christian, Qin Yulin, An Integrated Theory of the Mind., 10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036
  4. Boeing Airplane Safety: Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Aircraft Accidents: Worldwide Operations, 1959-2005. Boeing Commercial Airplane, Seattle, WA (2006)
  5. Chong, R.S., Laird, J.E.: Identifying dual-task executive process knowledge using EPIC-Soar. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1997)
  6. Chong, R.: The addition of an activation and decay mechanism to the Soar architecture. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (2003)
  7. Clarke David D, Ward Patrick J, Jones Jean, Overtaking road-accidents: differences in manoeuvre as a function of driver age, 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00105-x
  8. Corker, K.M.: Cognitive models and control: Human and system dynamics in advanced airspace operations. In: Sarter, N., Amalberti, R. (eds.) Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain, pp. 13–42. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)
  9. Cutting James E, Frances Wang Ranxiao, Flückiger Michelangelo, Baumberger Bernard, Human heading judgments and object-based motion information, 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00175-8
  10. DeLucia, P.R., Tharanathan, A.: Effects of optic flow and discrete warnings on deceleration detection during car-following. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, pp. 1673–1676. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2005)
  11. DeLucia P. R., Critical Roles for Distance, Task, and Motion in Space Perception: Initial Conceptual Framework and Practical Implications, 10.1518/001872008x312297
  12. DeLucia, P.R.: Pictorial and motion-based information for depth judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17, 738–748 (1991)
  13. Dornheim, M.A.: Dramatic Incidents Highlight Mode Problems in Cockpits. In: Aviation Week & Space Technology, January 30 (1995)
  14. Forsythe, C., Bernard, M.L., Goldsmith, T.E.: Human Cognitive Models in Systems Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)
  15. Freed, M.A., Remington, R.W.: Making human-machine system simulation a practical engineering tool: An apex overview. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (2000)
  16. Gersh, J.R., McKneely, J.A., Remington, R.W.: Cognitive engineering: Understanding human interaction with complex systems. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 26(4) (2005)
  17. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M.: The ABC Research Group: Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)
  18. Gluck, K., Pew, R.: Modeling Human Behavior with Integrated Cognitive Architectures: Comparison, Evaluation, and Validation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)
  19. Gray Rob, Regan David M., Perceptual Processes Used by Drivers During Overtaking in a Driving Simulator, 10.1518/0018720054679443
  20. Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
  21. Keeny, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Wiley & Sons, New York (1976)
  22. Klein Gary, Naturalistic Decision Making, 10.1518/001872008x288385
  23. Leiden, K., Laughery, K.R., Keller, J., French, J., Warwick, W., Wood, S.D.: A review of human performance models for the prediction of human error. Technical report, NASA, System-Wide Accident Prevention Program, Ames Research Center (2001)
  24. Lüdtke, A., Möbus, C.: A cognitive pilot model to predict learned carelessness for system design. In: Pritchett, A., Jackson, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero), 29.09.-01.10 (2004)
  25. Lüdtke Andreas, Osterloh Jan-Patrick, Mioch Tina, Rister Frank, Looije Rosemarijn, Cognitive Modelling of Pilot Errors and Error Recovery in Flight Management Tasks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2010) ISBN:9783642117497 p.54-67, 10.1007/978-3-642-11750-3_5
  26. Lüdtke Andreas, Osterloh Jan-Patrick, Simulating Perceptive Processes of Pilots to Support System Design, Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009 (2009) ISBN:9783642036545 p.471-484, 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_53
  27. Meyer David E., Kieras David E., A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms., 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3
  28. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: GPS, a program that simulates human thought. In: Feigenbaum, E., Feldmann, J. (eds.) Computers and Thought (1961)
  29. Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press (1994); Reprint edition
  30. Newell, A.: You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In: Chase, W.G. (ed.) Visual Information Processing. Academic Press, New York (1973)
  31. Norman, D.A.: Steps Toward a Cognitive Engineering: Design Rules Based on Analyses of Human Error. In: Nichols, J.A., Schneider, M.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 378–382. ACM Press, New York (1982)
  32. Nuxoll, A., Laird, J., James, M.: Comprehensive working memory activation in Soar. In: International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (2004)
  33. Olson, J.R., Olson, G.M.: The Growth of Cognitive Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction since GOMS. In: Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 221–265. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1990)
  34. Orasanu, J., Connolly, T.: The reinvention of decision making. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, C.E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 3–21. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NJ (1993)
  35. Pew, R., Mavor, A.S.: Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior. National Academy Press, Washington (1998)
  36. RITTER FRANK E., YOUNG RICHARD M., Embodied models as simulated users: introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design, 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0471
  37. Salvucci Dario D., A Multitasking General Executive for Compound Continuous Tasks, 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_19
  38. Sarter Nadine B., Woods David D., How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control, 10.1518/001872095779049516
  39. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: Strong, Silent and Out of the Loop: Properties of Advanced (Cockpit) Automation and their Impact on Human-Automation Interaction, Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory Report, CSEL 95-TR-01, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH (1995)
  40. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.: Automation Surprises. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors/Ergonomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1997)
  41. Simon, H.A.: A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. In: Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. Wiley, New York (1957)
  42. Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, 3rd edn. The Free Press, Collier Macmillan Publishers, London (1976)
  43. Todd Peter M., Gigerenzer Gerd, Putting naturalistic decision making into the adaptive toolbox, 10.1002/bdm.396
  44. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.E., Stanisfer, R.L., Castillan, N.J.: Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents. Report No. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77, Indiana University (1977)
  45. Treisman Anne M., Gelade Garry, A feature-integration theory of attention, 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
  46. Tversky A., Kahneman D., Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  47. Wiener, E.L.: Human Factors of Advanced Technology ("Glass Cockpit") Transport Aircraft. NASA Contractor Report No. 177528. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center (1989)
  48. Woods D. D., Roth E. M., Cognitive Engineering: Human Problem Solving with Tools, 10.1177/001872088803000404
  49. Woods, D.D., Johannesen, L.J., Cook, R.I., Sarter, N.B.: Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers, and Hindsight. Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH: CSERIAC (1994)
  50. Wray Robert E., Jones Randolph M., Considering Soar As An Agent Architecture, Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction ISBN:9780511610721 p.53-78, 10.1017/cbo9780511610721.004
  51. Zsambok, C.E., Beach, L.R., Klein, G.: A Literature Review of Analytical and Naturalistic Decision Making. Technical Report Klein Associates Inc., 582 E. Dayton-Yellow Springs Road, Fairborn, OH 45324-3987 (1992), http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/navy/klein_natur_decision.pdf
Bibliographic reference Lu uml dtke, A.. New Requirements for Modelling How Humans Succeed and Fail in Complex Traffic Scenarios.Human Error, Safety and Systems Development. 7th IFIP WG 13.5 Working Conference, HESSD 2009 (Brussels, Belgium, 23-25 September 2009). In: Palanque, P.; Vanderdonckt, J.; Winckler, M.;, Human Error, Safety and Systems Development. 7th IFIP WG 13.5 Working Conference, HESSD 2009, Springer-verlag2010, p. 1-17
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/67441