User menu

Cumulation and injury determination of the European community in antidumping cases

Bibliographic reference Tharakan, PKM ; Greenaway, D ; Tharakan, Joe. Cumulation and injury determination of the European community in antidumping cases.Annual Conference of the International-Economic-Study-Group on the Regulation of International Trade and Investment (UNIV NOTTINGHAM, NOTTINGHAM (England), Sep 12-14, 1997). In: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 134, no. 2, p. 320-339 (1998)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/62597
  1. Anderson, K. B. (1993). Agency Discretion or Statutory Direction: Decision Making at the US International Trade Commission.Journal of Law and Economics 36 (2): 915–935.
  2. Baldwin, R. E., and J. W. Steagall (1994). An Analysis of ITC Decisions in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130(2): 290–308.
  3. Bellis, J. F. (1990). The EEC Antidumping System. In J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst (eds.),Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  4. Commission of the European Communities (1983–1989).Annual Report(s) of the Commission to the European Parliament on the Community’s Antidumping and Antisubsidy Activities. Luxembourg.
  5. EUROSTAT (1980-1987).External Trade: Analytical Tables — N1MEXE – Imports. Vol. A to Z. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
  6. — (1983-1989).Structure and Activity of Industry. Annual Inquiry: Main Results. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
  7. Finger J. Michael, Fung Kwok Chiu, Special Edition: Antidumping Laws and Their Enforcements Guest Editor: James Hartigan : Will GATT Enforcement Control Antidumping?, 10.11130/jei.1994.9.2.198
  8. Greenaway David, Milner Chris, DETERMINANTS OF THE INTER-INDUSTRY STRUCTURE OF PROTECTION IN THE UK†, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1994.tb00017.x
  9. Hansen, W. L. (1990). International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism.American Political Science Review 84(1): 21–46.
  10. Hansen, W. L., and T. J. Prusa (1996). Cumulation and ITC Decision-Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater than the Whole.Economic Inquiry 34 (4): 746–769.
  11. Horlick, G. N. (1990). The United States Antidumping System. In J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst (eds.),Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  12. Jacquemin, A., P. A. Buigues, and F. Ilzkovitz (1989).Horizontal Mergers and Competition Policy in the European Community. European Economy 40. Brussels.
  13. Journal Officiel des Communautés Européennes (1987). Règlement (CEE) Nℴ2273/87 du Conseil du 15 juin 1987 remplaÇant les annexes du règlement (CEE) Nℴ 3420/83 relatif aux régimes d’importation des produits originaires des pays à commerce d’Etat non libéré au niveau communautaire. L217:1-3.
  14. Magnus, P. A. (1990). The Canadian Antidumping System. In J. H. Jackson and E.A. Vermulst (eds.),Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  15. Messerlin, P. (1990). Anti-Dumping Regulations or Pro-Cartel Law? The EC Chemical Cases.The World Economy 13(4): 465–492.
  16. — (1991). The Uruguay Negotiations on Antidumping Enforcement. In P. K.M. Tharakan (eds.),Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
  17. Moore, M. C. (1992). Rules or Politics? An Empirical Analysis of ITC Antidumping Decisions.Economic Inquiry 30 (3): 449–466.
  18. Official Journal of the European Communities (1980–1987). C and L Series, various issues.
  19. — (1984). Council Regulation (EC) Nℴ 2176/84 on Protection Against Dumped or Subsidized Imports from Countries not Members of the European Communities. L201:l-19.
  20. — (1994). Council Regulation (EC) Nℴ 3283/94 on Protection Against Dumped Imports from Countries not Members of the European Communities. L349:1–22.
  21. Palmeter, D. N. (1996). A Commentary on the WTO Anti-dumping Code.Journal of World Trade 30(4): 43–69.
  22. Rycken, W. (1991). Some Specific Issues in the Anti-dumping Proceedings of the European Communities. In P. K. M. Tharakan (eds.),Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  23. Schuknecht, L. (1992).Trade Protection in the European Community. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers.
  24. Steele, K. H. C. (1990). The Australian Antidumping System. In J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst (eds.),Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  25. Suder, J. T. (1983). Cumulation of Imports in Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations.George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 17 (2): 463–487.
  26. Tharakan, J. (1997). Is the Sum of the Parts Really Greater than the Whole? A Comment on the Paper on Cumulation and ITC Decision-Making. Mimeo.
  27. Tharakan, P. K. M. (1991). East European State Trading Countries and Antidumping Undertakings. In P. K. M. Tharakan (eds.),Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  28. — (1993). Contingent Protection: The US and EC Anti-Dumping Actions.The World Economy 16 (5): 575–600.
  29. — (1995). Political Economy and Contingent Protection.The Economic Journal 105(433): 1550–1564.
  30. Tharakan, P. K. M., and J. Waelbroeck (1994). Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Decisions in the EC and in the US: An Experiment in Comparative Political Economy.European Economic Review 38 (1): 171–193.
  31. Vermulst, E. A., and P. Waer (1991). The Calculation of Injury Margins in EC Antidumping Proceedings.Journal of World Trade 25(6): 5–42.