Daraio, Cinzia
Simar, Léopold
[UCL]
The explanation of productivity differentials is very important to identify the economic conditions that create inefficiency and to improve managerial performance. In the literature two main approaches have been developed: one-stage approaches and two-stage approaches. Daraio and Simar (2005, J Prod Anal 24(1):93-121) propose a fully nonparametric methodology based on conditional FDH and conditional order-m frontiers without any convexity assumption on the technology. However, convexity has always been assumed in mainstream production theory and general equilibrium. In addition, in many empirical applications, the convexity assumption can be reasonable and sometimes natural. Lead by these considerations, in this paper we propose a unifying approach to introduce external-environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies. Extending earlier contributions by Daraio and Simar (2005, J Prod Anal 24(1):93-121) as well as Cazals et al. (2002, J Econometrics 106:1-25), we introduce a conditional DEA estimator, i.e., an estimator of production frontier of DEA type conditioned to some external-environmental variables which are neither inputs nor outputs under the control of the producer. A robust version of this conditional estimator is proposed too. These various measures of efficiency provide also indicators of convexity which we illustrate using simulated and real data.
- Bogetoft P (1996) DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions. Manage Sci 42:457–465
- Bogetoft P, Tama JM, Tind J (2000) Convex input and output projections of nonconvex production possibility sets. Manage Sci 46(6):858–869
- Briec W, Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (2004) Non-convex technologies and cost functions: definitions, duality and nonparametric tests of convexity. J Econ 81(2):155–192
- Cazals C, Florens JP, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econometrics 106:1–25
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
- Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
- Daraio C (2003) Comparative efficiency and productivity analysis based on nonparametric and robust nonparametric methods. Methodology and Applications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa
- Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 24(1):93–121
- Daraio C., Simar L (2006) A robust nonparametric approach to evaluate and explain the performance of mutual funds. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):516-542
- Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292
- Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor inefficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurements. Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 243–267
- Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253–281
- Farrell MJ (1959) Convexity assumption in theory of competitive markets. J Polit Econ 67:377–391
- Florens JP, Simar L (2005) Parametric approximations of nonparametric frontier. J Econometrics 124:91–116
- Kneip A, Park BU, Simar L (1998) A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Economet Theor 14:783–793
- Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 13. John-Wiley and Sons Inc, New York
- Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Murthi B, Choi Y, Desai P (1997) Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: a nonparametric measurement. Eur J Oper Res 98:408–418
- Sengupta Jati K., Dynamic and Stochastic Efficiency Analysis - Economics of Data Envelopment Analysis, ISBN:9789812793300, 10.1142/9789812793300
- Park B, Simar L, Weiner Ch (2000) The FDH estimator for productivity efficiency scores: asymptotic properties. Economet Theor 16:855–877
- Podinovski VV (2005) Selective convexity in DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 161(2):552–564
- Sheather SJ, Jones MC (1991) A relyable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B 53(3):683–690
- Silverman B. W., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, ISBN:9780412246203, 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9
- Simar L (2003) Detecting outliers in frontiers models: a simple approach. J Prod Anal 20:391–424
- Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13:49–78
- Simar L, Wilson P (2001) Testing restrictions in nonparametric efficiency models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 30(1):159–184
- Simar L, Wilson P (2002) Nonparametric test of return to scale. Eur J Oper Res 139:115–132
- Simar L, Wilson P (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econometric 136(1): 31–64
Bibliographic reference |
Daraio, Cinzia ; Simar, Léopold. Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach.12th International Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference (Ithaca(Ny), Jun 25-27, 2007). In: Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 28, no. 1-2, p. 13-32 (2007) |
Permanent URL |
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/59800 |