User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

The science commons in life science research: structure, function, and value of access to genetic diversity

Primary tabs

download
  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 179.02 K
Cook-Deegan, Robert Dedeurwaerdere, Tom [UCL]

Innovation in the life sciences depends on how much information is produced as well as how widely and easily it is shared. Policies governing the science commons-or alternative, more restricted informational spaces-determine how widely and quickly information is distributed. The purpose of this paper is to highlight why the science commons matters and to analyse its structure and function. The main lesson from our analysis is that both the characteristics of the physical resources (from genes to microbes, plants and animals) and the norms and beliefs of the different research communities-think of the Bermuda rules in the human genome case or the Belem declaration for bioprospecting matter in the institutional choices made when organising the science commons. We also show that the science commons contributes to solving some of the collective action dilemmas that arise in the production of knowledge in Pasteur's Quadrant, when information is both scientifically important and practically applicable. We show the importance of two of these dilemmas for the life sciences, which we call respectively the diffusion-innovation dilemma (how readily innovation diffuses) and the exploration-exploitation dilemma (when application requires collective action).

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès libre
Publication date 2006
Language Anglais
Journal information "International Social Science Journal" - Vol. 58, no. 188, p. 299-318 (2006)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. (Chichester)
issn 0020-8701
e-issn 1468-2451
Publication status Publié
Affiliations UCL - ISP - Institut supérieur de philosophie
UCL - DRT/CPDR - Centre de philosophie du droit
Links
  1. Y. Benkler, 1998 . The commons as a neglected factor of information policy. Remarks at the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (Sept. 1998). Available from: http://www.benkler.org/commons.pdf(Accessed July 2005).
  2. Brahy N., Les Carnets du Centre de Philosophie du Droit, 117, 29 (2005)
  3. M. Cassier, and D. Foray, 1999 . The economics of high-tech consortia. Case studies in bio-medical research.Colline Working Paper Series, no WP02.
  4. Cohen W. M., Management Science, 48, 1 (2002)
  5. D. M. Cutler, and S. Kadiyala, 2001 . The return to biomedical research: treatment and behavioral effects. Working Paper.http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/dcutler/papers/cutler_kadiyala_for_topel.pdf(Accessed 3 April 2005).
  6. Demsetz H., American Economic Review, 62, 347 (1967)
  7. Foray D., The economics of knowledge (2004)
  8. Gardner M. J., Nature, 41, 498 (2002)
  9. Gilks W. R., Mathematical Biosciences, 193, 223 (2005)
  10. Goeschl T., The economics of managing biotechnologies, 214 (2002)
  11. Greer D., Blue genes. Sharing and conserving the world's aquatic biodiversity (2004)
  12. Grifo F. T., Valuing local knowledge (1996)
  13. Gupta A. K., World Intellectual Property organisation publications, 769 (2004)
  14. Heller M. A., Science, 280, 698 (1998)
  15. Holden A. L., Biotechniques, 22 (2002)
  16. Holt R. A., The Genome Sequence of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae, 10.1126/science.1076181
  17. E. James, 2002 .Establishing international scientific collaborations: lessons learned from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Report to the Sixth Meeting of the OECD Global Science Forum, January 2002.
  18. D. Kaufman, A. Johnson, and R. Cook-Deegan, 2004 . Stanford-in-Washington program, unpublished data (July).
  19. Lander E. S., Nature, 409, 860 (2001)
  20. L. Lessig, 1999 .Code and the commons. Keynote address at the Conference on Media Convergence, Fordham University Law School (9 February, 1999). Available fromhttp://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/fordham.pdf(Accessed July 2005).
  21. Merton R. K., The sociology of science (1973)
  22. Missinou M. A., The Lancet, 360, 1941 (2002)
  23. K. M. Murphy, and R. Topel, 1999 . "The economic value of medical research". Paper commissioned for Funding First and the Lasker Foundation. Available from: http://www.laskerfoundation.org/reports/pdf/economicvalue.pdf(Accessed 3 April 2005).
  24. National Research Council, Bits of power: issues in global access to scientific data (1997)
  25. OECD, OECD Science and Information Technology, 7 (2001)
  26. Pennissi E., Science, 286, 447 (1999)
  27. Posey D. A., Le marche mondial de la propriete intellectuelle (1997)
  28. PRINCIPE PETER P., The Economic Significance of Plants and their Constituents as Drugs, Economic and Medicinal Plant Research (1989) ISBN:9780127300641 p.1-17, 10.1016/b978-0-12-730064-1.50005-7
  29. Schlager E., The political economy of customs and culture: informal solutions to the commons problem, 13 (1993)
  30. Sheldon J. W., Intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation: an interdisciplinary analysis of the values of medicinal plants (1995)
  31. Smith T. F., Genomics, 6, 701 (1990)
  32. Stokes D. E., Pasteur's quadrant: basic science and technological innovation (1997)
  33. Sulston J., The common thread: a story of science, politics, ethics, and the human genome (2002)
  34. Ten Kate K., The commercial use of biodiversity (2002)
  35. Thorisson G. A., Nucleic Acids Research, 1 (2003)
  36. Venter J. C., Science, 291, 1304 (2001)
  37. Verma I. M., Molecular Therapy, 5, 95 (2002)
  38. Williamson Alan R., The Merck Gene Index project, 10.1016/s1359-6446(99)01303-3
  39. World Health organisation, Genomics and world health (2002)
  40. J. P. Walsh, Ch. Cho, and W.M Cohen, 2005 . Patents, material transfers and access to research inputs in biomedical research. Final Report to the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein-Related Inventions, 60 pp. Available from: http://tigger.uic.edu/~jwalsh/WalshChoCohenFinal050922.pdf(Accessed 22 September 2006).
  41. Ziman J., Reliable knowledge: an exploration of the grounds for belief in science (1978)
  42. S. Hansen, A. Brewster, J. Asher, and M. Kisielewski , 2006 . The effects of patenting on the AAAS scientific community. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available online at: http://sippi.aaas.org/survey(Accessed 23 December 2006).
Bibliographic reference Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Dedeurwaerdere, Tom. The science commons in life science research: structure, function, and value of access to genetic diversity. In: International Social Science Journal, Vol. 58, no. 188, p. 299-318 (2006)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/59792