User menu

Are Lateral Differences in Word-processing Modulated By Concreteness, Imageability, Both, Or Neither

Bibliographic reference Bruyer, Raymond ; Racquez, F.. Are Lateral Differences in Word-processing Modulated By Concreteness, Imageability, Both, Or Neither. In: International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 27, no. 3-4, p. 181-189 (1985)
Permanent URL
  1. Beaumont J. G, Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. (1982)
  2. Boles David B., Dissociated imageability, concreteness, and familiarity in lateralized word recognition, 10.3758/bf03196988
  3. Bradshaw John L., Gates E.Anne, Visual field differences in verbal tasks: Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject, 10.1016/0093-934x(78)90016-0
  4. Bruyer R., Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 113 (1985)
  5. Coltheart M, Deep dyslexia. (1980)
  6. Day J, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 518 (1977)
  7. Day James, Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability, 10.1016/0028-3932(79)90059-9
  8. Ehrlichman Howard, Barrett John, Right hemispheric specialization for mental imagery: A review of the evidence, 10.1016/0278-2626(83)90029-5
  9. Ellis Hadyn D., Shepherd John W., Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in left and right visual fields., 10.1037/h0037363
  10. Haynes William O., Moore W.H., Sentence Imagery and Recall: An Electroencephalographic Evaluation of Hemispheric Processing in Males and Females, 10.1016/s0010-9452(81)80006-8
  11. Hines David, Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields, 10.1016/0028-3932(76)90050-6
  12. Hines David, Difference's in Tachistoscopic Recognition Between Abstract and Concrete Words as a Function of Visual Half-Field and Frequency, 10.1016/s0010-9452(77)80055-5
  13. Lambent A.J., Beaumont J.G., Comparative Processing of Imageable Nouns in the Left and Right Visual Fields, 10.1016/s0010-9452(81)80029-9
  14. Lambert A.J, Beaumont J.G, Imageability does not interact with visual field in lateral word recognition with oral report, 10.1016/0093-934x(83)90036-6
  15. Mannhaupt H. -R., Processing of abstract and concrete nouns in a lateralized memory-search task, 10.1007/bf00309353
  16. Marcel A. J., Attention and performance VII. (1978)
  17. Orenstein Howard B., Meighan Walter B., Recognition of bilaterally presented words varying in concreteness and frequency: Lateral dominance or sequential processing?, 10.3758/bf03337159
  18. Paivio A., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Monograph)' Supplement, 76 (1968)
  19. Patterson Karalyn, Besner Derek, Is the right hemisphere literate?, 10.1080/02643298408252856
  20. Patterson K. E., Marcel A. J., Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words, 10.1080/14640747708400606
  21. Rae Gordon, Table of A′, 10.2466/pms.1976.42.1.98
  22. Regard Marianne, Landis Theodor, Experimentally Induced Semantic Paralexias in Normals: A Property of the Right Hemisphere, 10.1016/s0010-9452(84)80043-x
  23. Richardson J. T. E, Journal of Mental Imagery, 4, 87 (1980)
  24. Schmuller Joseph, Goodman Roberta, Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality, 10.1016/0093-934x(79)90042-7
  25. Seamon John G, Gazzaniga M.S, Coding strategies and cerebral laterality effects, 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90035-2
  26. Shanon Benny, Lateralization effects in lexical decision tasks, 10.1016/0093-934x(79)90065-8
  27. Whitehouse Peter J., Imagery and verbal encoding in left and right hemisphere damaged patients, 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90083-3