User menu

The Veil of Ignorance Violates Priority

Bibliographic reference Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. ; Roemer, John E.. The Veil of Ignorance Violates Priority. In: Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 24, no. 2, p. 233-257 (2008)
Permanent URL
  1. Barry, Theories of justice, Vol. 1 (1989)
  2. Barry, Justice as impartiality (1995)
  3. Broome, Weighing goods (1991)
  4. Brun Bernt Christian, Tungodden Bertil, Non-welfaristic theories of justice: Is ?the intersection approach? a solution to the indexing impasse?, 10.1007/s00355-003-0276-0
  5. Cohen, The Tanner lectures on human values (1992)
  6. Dhillon Amrita, Mertens Jean-Francois, Relative Utilitarianism, 10.1111/1468-0262.00033
  7. Dreze Jacques, Essays on economic decisions under uncertainty, ISBN:9780511559464, 10.1017/cbo9780511559464
  8. Dworkin, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 185 (1981)
  9. Dworkin, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283 (1981)
  10. Fleurbaey Marc, Trannoy Alain, The impossibility of a Paretian egalitarian, 10.1007/s00355-003-0258-2
  11. Harsanyi John C., Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking, 10.1086/257416
  12. Harsanyi John C., Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility, 10.1086/257678
  13. Harsanyi John C., Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations, ISBN:9780511571756, 10.1017/cbo9780511571756
  14. Harsanyi, Utilitarianism and beyond (1982)
  15. Karni Edi, Subjective Expected Utility Theory with State-Dependent Preferences, 10.1006/jeth.1993.1051
  16. Karni Edi, Impartiality: Definition and Representation, 10.2307/2999622
  17. Karni Edi, Impartiality and interpersonal comparisons of variations in well-being, 10.1007/s00355-003-0203-4
  18. Karni Edi, Weymark John A., An informationally parsimonious impartial observer theorem, 10.1007/s003550050108
  19. Mongin Philippe, The impartial observer theorem of social ethics, 10.1017/s0266267101000219
  20. Mongin, Handbook of Utility Theory, 371 (1998)
  21. Moreno-Ternero Juan D, Roemer John E, Impartiality, Priority, and Solidarity in the Theory of Justice, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00710.x
  22. Pattanaik P. K., Xu Y., Minimal relativism, dominance, and standard of living comparisons based on functionings, 10.1093/oep/gpl030
  23. Parfit, Ratio:, 202 (1997)
  24. Rawls, A theory of justice (1971)
  25. Roemer, Theories of distributive justice (1996)
  26. Roemer John E., , Egalitarianism Against the Veil of Ignorance : , 10.2307/3655614
  27. Roemer John E., Eclectic distributional ethics, 10.1177/1470594x04046238
  28. Scanlon, What we owe to each other (1998)
  29. Segal Uzi, Let's Agree That All Dictatorships Are Equally Bad, 10.1086/262129
  30. Sen Amartya, Foster James, On Economic Inequality, ISBN:9780198281931, 10.1093/0198281935.001.0001
  31. Sen Amartya, Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem, 10.1007/bf00136651
  32. Sen, Equality of what? (1980)
  33. Skiadas Costis, Conditioning and Aggregation of Preferences, 10.2307/2171896
  34. Stigler, American Economic Review, 67, 76 (1977)
  35. Temkin, Inequality (1993)
  36. Vickrey William, Measuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk, 10.2307/1906925
  37. Vickrey William, Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules, 10.2307/1884349
  38. Weymark, Interpersonal comparisons of well-being (1991)
  39. Yaari Menahem E, Rawls, edgeworth, shapley, nash: Theories of distributive justice re-examined, 10.1016/0022-0531(81)90062-4