User menu

La médecine fondée sur les preuves : un outil de contrôle des soins de santé ? Application au traitement de la douleur

Primary tabs
Add to cart
Print
Copyright (Sherpa/Romeo)
References48
Authors :
Document type : Article de périodique (Journal article) – Synthèse de littérature
Abstract :

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is described by its proponents as the only tool allowing a valid and unbiased evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. As a consequence, numerous health-care managers consider it a method of distinguishing between effective procedures deserving funding and those found ineffective. Several authors, however, have questioned the capacity of EBM to achieve these objectives on epistemological, methodological, ethical, political, economical, anthropological and sociological grounds. A review of their objections shows that, although EBM is a powerful tool for analysing specific, well-defined questions, a wide range of clinical problems, such as chronic pain management, cannot be adequately assessed by its methods. The dogmatic use of EBM, therefore, is philosophically and scientifically unsound, alienating for patients and clinicians, and unethical. It contributes to the expansion of the biomedical model of clinical care at the expense of the more appropriate biopsychosocial model.
Access type : Accès restreint
Publication date : 2007
Language : Français
Journal information : "Douleur et Analgésie" - Vol. 20, no. 2, p. 64-72 (2007)
Peer reviewed : yes
Publisher : Springer France ((France) Paris)
issn : 1011-288X
e-issn : 1951-6398
Publication status : Publié
Affiliations : UCL - MD/FSIO - Département de physiologie et pharmacologie
UCL - (SLuc) Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation motrice
Keywords : evidence-based medicine ; ethics ; health economics ; health organizations
Links :
Bibliographic reference Berquin, Anne. La médecine fondée sur les preuves : un outil de contrôle des soins de santé ? Application au traitement de la douleur. In: Douleur et Analgésie, Vol. 20, no. 2, p. 64-72 (2007)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/36456

References Provided by I4OC

  1. Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Évaluation en Santé (ANAES) (2000) Guide d’analyse de la littérature et gradation des recommandations. http://www.anaes.fr
  2. Backonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, et al. (1998) Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 280(21): 1831–1836
  3. Bingefors K, Isacson D (2004) Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain — a gender perspective. Eur J Pain 8(5): 435–450
  4. Breivik H (2005) Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain, indications and controversies. Eur J Pain 9(2): 127–130
  5. Bryan-Brown CW, Dracup K (2004) Evidence-based pandemonium. Am J Crit Care 13(1): 10–12
  6. Cahana A (2005) Ethical and epistemological problems when applying evidence-based medcine to pain management. Pain Practice 5(4): 298–302
  7. Charlton BG, Miles A (1998) The rise and fall of EBM. QJM 91: 371–374
  8. Cohen AM, Stavri PZ, Hersch WR (2004) Categorization and analysis of the criticism of Evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Informatics 73: 35–43
  9. Craft RM, Mogil JS, Aloisi AM (2004) Sex differences in pain and analgesia: the role of gonadal hormones. Eur J Pain 8(5): 397–411
  10. Davidoff F., Haynes B., Sackett D., Smith R., Evidence based medicine, 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1085
  11. Eisenberg E, McNicol ED, Carr DB (2005) Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 293(24): 3043–3052
  12. Gillet P, Swingedau O (2004) Le centre fédéral d’expertise des soins de santé est né. http://www.abhbvz.be/francais/revue/n1vol2/article3.html . Hospitals.be, volume 2, no 1, 2004
  13. Gombatto SP, Collins DR, Sahrmann SA, et al. (2006) Gender differences in pattern of hip and lumbopelvic rotation in people with low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(3): 263–271
  14. Green CR, Anderson KO, Baker TA, et al. (2003) The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain. Pain Med 4(3): 277–294
  15. Gupta M (2003) A critical appraisal ef evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. J Eval Clin Pract 9(2): 111–121
  16. Haynes RB (2002) What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Serv Res 2(1): 3
  17. Johnson FN, Johnson RD, Armer ML (2001) Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 12(3–4): 125–211
  18. Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, Lee DS, et al. (2004) Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. N Engl J Med 351(6): 543–551
  19. Kallai I, Barke A, Voss U (2004) The effects of experimenter characteristics on pain reports in women and men. Pain 112(1–2): 142–147
  20. Kalso E (2000) Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (1). Eur J Pain 4(2): 217–219
  21. Kalso E, Moore RA (2000) Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (2). Eur J Pain 4: 321–324
  22. Kalso E, Edwards J, McQuay HJ, et al. (2001) Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (3). Eur J Pain 5(2): 227–230
  23. Kalso E, Edwards J, McQuay HJ, et al. (2002) Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4). Eur J Pain 6(1): 89–93
  24. Kalso E, Edwards J, McQuay HJ, et al. (2002) Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (5). Eur J Pain 6(5): 409–412
  25. Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, et al. (2004) Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. The Journal of Pain 5(4): 195–211
  26. Keogh E, Arendt-Nielsen L (2004) Guest editorial: sex differences in pain. Eur J Pain 8(5): 395–396
  27. Kerridge I., Lowe M., Henry D., Personal paper: Ethics and evidence based medicine, 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1151
  28. Le Breton D (1990) Anthropologie du corps et modernité. PUF, Paris
  29. Le Breton D (1995) Anthropologie de la douleur. Métailié, Paris
  30. Leeder SR, Rychetnik L (2001) Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Med J Aust 175(3): 161–164
  31. Little M (2003): ’Better than numbers...’ A gentle critique of evidence-based medicine. ANZ J Surg 73(4): 177–178
  32. Mykhalovskiy E, Weir L (2004) The problem of evidence-based medicine: directions for social sciences. Soc Sci Med 59(5): 1059–1069
  33. Porta M (2004) Is there life after evidence-based medicine? J Eval Clin Pract 10(2): 147–152
  34. Porta M (2006) Five warrants for medical decision making: some considerations and a proposal to better integrate evidence-based medicine into everyday practice (A commentary to ‘integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches’ by Mark Tonelli). J Eval Clin Pract 12(3): 265–268
  35. Rogers WA (2004) Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups. J Med Ethics 30(2): 141–145
  36. Rogers WA (2004) Evidence-based medicine and women: do the principles and practice of EBM further women’s health? Bioethics 18(1): 50–71
  37. Saarni SI, Gylling HA (2004) Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science? J Med Ethics 30(2): 171–175
  38. Sackett DL, Straus S, Richardson SR, et al. (2000) Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, London
  39. Saver JL, Kalafut M (2001) Combination therapies and the theoretical limits of evidence-based medicine. Neuroepidemiology 20(2): 57–64
  40. Shahar E (1997) A Popperian perspective of the term evidence-based medicine. J Eval Clin Practice 3(2): 109–116
  41. Shahar E.: Evidence-based medicine: a new paradigm of the emperor’s new clothes ? J. Eval. Clin. Practice 4(4): 277–282, 1998.
  42. Shahar E.: On morality and logic in medical practice: commentary of ‘a critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations’ (Gupta 2003, J. Eval. Clin. Practice 9, 111–21). J. Eval. Clin. Practice 9(2): 133–135, 2003
  43. Stamer U.M., Bayerer B.& Stuber F.: Genetics and variability in opioid response. Eur J Pain. 9(2): 101–104, 2005.
  44. Tait R.C., Pollard A., Margolis R.B., Duckro P.N. & Krause S.J.: The pain disability index: psychometric and validity data. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68: 438–441, 1987.
  45. Upshur R.E.G.: If not evidence, then what ? Or does medicine really need a base ? J. Eval. Clin. Practice 8(2): 113–119, 2002.
  46. Ware J.E. & Sherbourne C.D.: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med. Care 30(6): 473–481, 1992.
  47. Woolf S.H.: Do clinical practice guidelines define good medical care ? The need for good science and the disclosure of uncertainty when defining best practices. Chest 113(3 suppl): 166S–171S, 1998.
  48. Zigmond A.S. & Snaith R.P.: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 67: 361–370, 1983. Berquin A., 6/17