User menu

An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: A multicenter study

Bibliographic reference Vermandel, M. ; Fin, L. ; Hapdey, S. ; Bol, Anne ; Betrouni, N. ; et. al. An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: A multicenter study. In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, no. 9, p. 3922-3934 (2008)
Permanent URL
  1. Daube-Witherspoon, J. Nucl. Med., 43, 398 (2002)
  2. Adam L.-E., Zaers J., Ostertag H., Trojan H., Bellemann M.E., Brix G., Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR/sup +/ following the IEC standard, 10.1109/23.596983
  3. Etchebehere, Q. J. Nucl. Med., 46, 122 (2002)
  4. Bergmann Helmar, Dobrozemsky Georg, Minear Gregory, Nicoletti Rudolf, Samal Martin, An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality, 10.1088/0031-9155/50/10/001
  5. Herzog H., Tellmann L., Hocke C., Pietrzyk U., Casey M.E., Kuwert T., NEMA NU2-2001 guided performance evaluation of four Siemens ECAT PET scanners, 10.1109/tns.2004.835778
  6. Hyde Rosemary J., Ellis James H., Gardner Edward A., Zhang Yantian, Carson Paul L., MRI scanner variability studies using a semi-automated analysis system, 10.1016/0730-725x(94)91241-n
  7. NEMA NU 2-2001
  8. IEC TR 61948-1:2001 and 61948-3:2005
  13. Myridis N.E., Chamzas C., Sampling on concentric circles [MRI image reconstruction application], 10.1109/42.700741
  14. MacIntyre William J., Alfidi Ralph J., Haaga John, Chernak Edward, Meany Thomas F., Comparative Modulation Transfer Functions of the EMI and Delta Scanners, 10.1148/120.1.189
  15. Judy, Phantoms for performance evaluation and quality assurance of CT scanners, 23 (1977)
  16. Bourel Philippe, Gibon David, Coste Eric, Daanen Vincent, Rousseau Jean, Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment, 10.1118/1.598809
  18. Wells William M., Viola Paul, Atsumi Hideki, Nakajima Shin, Kikinis Ron, Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information, 10.1016/s1361-8415(01)80004-9
  19. Comtat C., Kinahan P.E., Defrise M., Michel C., Townsend D.W., Fast reconstruction of 3D PET data with accurate statistical modeling, 10.1109/23.681983
  20. Browne J., de Pierro A.B., A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography, 10.1109/42.538946
  21. Hudson H.M., Larkin R.S., Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data, 10.1109/42.363108
  22. Watson C.C., New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET, 10.1109/23.873020
  23. Bergstrom, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 10, 845 (1983)
  24. Boellaard, J. Nucl. Med., 45, 1519 (2004)
  25. Vial S., Gibon D., Vasseur C., Rousseau J., Volume delineation by fusion of fuzzy sets obtained from multiplanar tomographic images, 10.1109/42.974931
  26. Caudrelier Jean-Michel, Vial Stephane, Gibon David, Kulik Carine, Fournier Charles, Castelain Bernard, Coche-Dequeant Bernard, Rousseau Jean, MRI definition of target volumes using fuzzy logic method for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03829-4
  27. G. Palos N. Betrouni M. Coulanges M. Vermandel V. Devlaminck J. Rousseau Multimodal matching by maximisation of mutual information and optical flow technique 3 1679 1682 2004
  28. Knoess C., Gremillion T., Schmand M., Casey M.E., Eriksson L., Lenox M., Treffert J.T., Vollmar S., Fluegge G., Wienhard K., Heiss W.-D., Nutt R., Development of a daily quality check procedure for the High-Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) using natural LSO background radioactivity, 10.1109/tns.2002.803787