User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies

  1. Ammenberg, J.How do standardised environmental management systems affect environmental performance and business?. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Licenciate Thesis No. 907. Linköping: Linköping University.
  2. Andrews Richard N. L., 10.1023/a:1004377715029
  3. Andrews, R. L.Environmental management systems: do they improve performance?. National Database on Environmental Management Systems, Project Final Report, The University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill. 30 January.
  4. Ankele K., Innovationswirkungen von Umweltmanagementsystemen - Wirkungsmodell und Literaturstudie. IOeW Discussion Paper 52/02 (2002)
  5. Anton Wilma Rose Q., Deltas George, Khanna Madhu, Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance, 10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.003
  6. Arora Seema, Cason Timothy N., An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA′s 33/50 Program, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1018
  7. Barla Philippe, ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec's pulp and paper industry, 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.004
  8. Berkhout F., Measuring environmental performance in industry. Final report to the European Commission, February (2001)
  9. Berry Michael A., Rondinelli Dennis A., Environmental management in the pharmaceutical industry: integrating corporate responsibility and business strategy, 10.1002/1520-6483(200021)9:3<21::aid-tqem3>3.0.co;2-4
  10. Coglianese G., Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals? (2001)
  11. Conceição, P., Heitor, M. V. and Veloso, F. Innovative shocks and productivity.Paper presented at the conferenceWhat do we know about innovation?A conference in honour of Keith Pavitt. November13–15, University of Sussex, Brighton.
  12. Dahlström Kristina, Howes Chris, Leinster Paul, Skea Jim, Environmental management systems and company performance: assessing the case for extending risk-based regulation : EMSs AND COMPANY PERFORMANCE, 10.1002/eet.323
  13. Davies, J. C. and Mazurek, J.Industry incentives for environmental improvement: evaluation of US federal initiatives. Report to the Global Environmental Management Initiative, Resources for the Future. Washington, DC. DC
  14. Dryzek J., Rational ecology: the political economy of environmental choice (1987)
  15. Dyllick T., Zeitschrift für umweltpolitik und umweltrecht, 4, 507 (1999)
  16. Vorlaufige untersuchungsergebnisse und handlungsempfehlungenzum forschungsprojekt ‘Evaluierung von umweltmanagementsystemen zur vorbereitung der 1998 vorgesehenen ueberpruefung des gemeinschaftlichen Oeko-Audit-Systems (1998)
  17. Fischer F., Evaluating public policy (1995)
  18. Florida R., Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?, 82 (2001)
  19. Gunningham N., Smart regulation: designing environmental policy (1998)
  20. Gunningham N., Shades of green: business, regulation and environment (2003)
  21. Hamschmidt, J. Economic and ecological impacts of Environmental Management Systems in companies: experience from Switzerland.Paper presented at Euro environment 2000 – visions, strategies and actions towards sustainable industries. Aalborg, DK, DK.
  22. Hamschmidt J., Greener management international, 34, 43 (2001)
  23. Jäger T., Umweltschutz, umweltmanagement und umweltberatung - ergebnisse einer befragung in kleinen und mittleren unternehmen. ISO Bericht 55 (1998)
  24. Jaggi Bikki, Freedman Martin, AN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF POLLUTION PERFORMANCE ON ECONOMIC AND MARKET PERFORMANCE: PULP AND PAPER FIRMS, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00652.x
  25. Jordan Andrew, Wurzel Rüdiger K.W., Zito Anthony R., 'New' Instruments of Environmental Governance: Patterns and Pathways of Change, 10.1080/714000665
  26. Jordan Andrew, Wurzel Rüdiger K.W., Zito Anthony R., Comparative Conclusions - 'New' Environmental Policy Instruments: An Evolution or a Revolution in Environmental Policy?, 10.1080/714000667
  27. Khanna Madhu, Non-Mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection, 10.1111/1467-6419.00141
  28. Khanna Madhu, Damon Lisa A, EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms, 10.1006/jeem.1998.1057
  29. King A. A., Lenox M. J., INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION WITHOUT SANCTIONS: THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY'S RESPONSIBLE CARE PROGRAM., 10.2307/1556362
  30. Kolln Kelly, Prakash Aseem, 10.1023/a:1016071810725
  31. Kuisma M., Hypotheses on the impact of environmental management systems in industry (2001)
  32. Matthews Deanna H., Christini Gwen C., Hendrickson Chris T., Five Elements for Organizational Decision-Making with an Environmental Management System, 10.1021/es0351239
  33. Mohammed Matouq, The ISO 14001 EMS Implementation Process and Its Implications: A Case Study of Central Japan, 10.1007/s002679910014
  34. Newell R. G., Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N., The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change, 10.1162/003355399556188
  35. Potoski Matthew, Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?, 10.1111/0033-3352.00034
  36. Potoski Matthew, Prakash Aseem, Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance, 10.1002/pam.20136
  37. Potoski Matthew, Prakash Aseem, Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms' Regulatory Compliance, 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.x
  38. Potoski Matthew, Prakash Aseem, Institutional Design for EMS-Based Government Procurement Policies, 10.1162/glep.2006.6.4.13
  39. Russo M. V., Institutional change and theories of organizational strategy: ISO 14001 and toxic emissions in the electronics industry. Working paper, September 2001 (2001)
  40. Schaltegger Stefan, Synnestvedt Terje, The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance, 10.1006/jema.2002.0555
  41. Schön D. A., The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action (1983)
  42. Steger U., Zeitschrift für umweltpolitik und umweltrecht, 4, 467 (2000)
  43. Steinle, C. and Baumast, A. 1997.Oeko-Audit: problemstand und Empfehlungen fuer eine erfolgreiche Praxis, 11–64. Osnabrueck: Universitaet Hannover.
  44. Thornton D., California management review, 46, 127 (2003)
  45. TIETENBERG T. H., ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, 10.1093/oxrep/6.1.17
  46. Tyteca Daniel, Sustainability Indicators at the Firm Level. : Pollution and Resource Efficiency as a Necessary Condition Toward Sustainability, 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.61
  47. Tyteca Daniel, Carlens J�r�me, Berkhout Frans, Hertin Julia, Wehrmeyer Walter, Wagner Marcus, Corporate environmental performance evaluation: evidence from the MEPI project, 10.1002/bse.312
  48. Tyteca Daniel, Carlens J�r�me, Berkhout Frans, Hertin Julia, Wehrmeyer Walter, Wagner Marcus, Corporate environmental performance evaluation: evidence from the MEPI project, 10.1002/bse.312
  49. UNI/ASU, Öko-Audit in der mittelständischen praxis – evaluierung und ansätze für eine effizienzsteigerung von umweltmanagementsystemen in der praxis (1997)
  50. Wagner, M. The relationship between environmental and economic performance of firms and the influence of ISO 14001 and EMAS. An empirical analysis and implications for government policy.Paper presented at the 5thEnvironmental Management Accounting Network Europe(EMAN-Europe) Annual Conference. February11–12, Cheltenham Gloucestershire, UK.
  51. Wätzold Frank, Bültmann Alexandra, Eames Malcolm, Lulofs Kris, Schucht Simone, EMAS and regulatory relief in Europe: lessons from national experience : EMAS AND REGULATORY RELIEF, 10.1002/eet.249
  52. Weick K. E., Sensemaking in organisations (1996)
Bibliographic reference Hertin, Julia ; Berkhout, Frans ; Wagner, Marcus ; Tyteca, Daniel. Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 51, no. 2, p. 259-283 (2008)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/36359