User menu

Competitive Markets for Pollution Permits: Impact on Factor Income and International Equilibrium

Bibliographic reference Jouvet, Pierre-Andre ; Michel, Philippe ; Rotillon, Gilles. Competitive Markets for Pollution Permits: Impact on Factor Income and International Equilibrium. In: Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1-11 (2010)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/34430
  1. Baranzini, A., & Perkaus, J. (1998). Sub-national actors participating in international emissions trading? Issues on design and prospects, working paper WP63. Geneva: International Academy of the Environment.
  2. Baumol, W., & Oates, W. E. (1998). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bernard, A., Fischer, C., & Fox, A. (2007). Is there a rationale for output-based rebating of environmental levies?. Resource and Energy Economics, 29, 83–101.
  4. Bohm Peter, Russell Clifford S., Chapter 10 Comparative analysis of alternative policy instruments, Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics (1985) ISBN:9780444876447 p.395-460, 10.1016/s1573-4439(85)80013-0
  5. Bovenberg, A. L, Goulder, L. H., & Gurney, D. J. (2005). Efficiency costs of meeting industry-distributional constraints under environmental permits and taxes. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 950–970.
  6. Bréchet, Th., & Jouvet, P. A. (2009). Why environmental management may yield no-regret pollution abatement options. Ecological Economics, 68, 1770–1777.
  7. Canadian Non-paper (1998). Non-paper on principles, modalities. Rules and guidelines for an international emissions trading regime.
  8. CDC and Powernext Carbon (2007a). Bulletin mensuel du marché europé en du CO2, 19 November.
  9. CDC and Powernext Carbon (2007b). Bulletin mensuel du marché européen du CO2, 20, December.
  10. Chasek, P., & Downie, L. (1998). European union views on international greenhouse gas emissions trading. Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, Environmental Policy Studies, Working Paper.
  11. Congressional Budget Office (2000). Who gains and who pays under carbon-allowance trading? The distributional effects of alternative policy designs. Washington D.C.: Congressional Budget Office.
  12. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. C. (1994). North-south trade and the environment. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 109, 755–787.
  13. Dales, J. H. (1968). Pollution, property and prices. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
  14. Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. (2006). Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of EU emissions trading scheme based on the 2005 emissions data. MIT Working Paper, 141, 1–34.
  15. Goodin, R. E. (1994). Selling environmental indulgences. Kyklos, 47, 573–596.
  16. Goulder, L. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157–183.
  17. Goulder, L., Parry, I. W. H., Williams, R. C., & Burtraw, D. (1999). The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 329–360.
  18. Hahn Robert W, Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor's Orders, 10.1257/jep.3.2.95
  19. Hahn, F., & Solow, R. (1995). A critical essay on macroeconomic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  20. Kete, N. (1992). The U.S. acid rain control allowance trading system, climate change—designing a tradeable permit system. Paris: OECD.
  21. Jouvet, P. A., & Michel, P., & Rotillon, G. (2005). Optimal growth with pollution: How to use pollution permits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29, 1597–1609.
  22. Montgomery, D. W. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 74, 395–418.
  23. Noll, R. (1982). Implementing marketable emission permits. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 72, 120–124.
  24. Oates, W. (1995). Green taxes can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time? Southern Economic Journal, 61, 915–922.
  25. Parry, I. W. H. (2004). Are emissions permits regressive? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 364–387.
  26. Parry, I. W. H. (2002). Are tradeable emissions permits a good idea? Resources for the future issues brief 02-33. Washington D.C.
  27. Parry, I. W. H., Williams, R. C., & Goulder, L. H. (1999). When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 52–84.
  28. Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economic of natural resources and the environment. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  29. Stavins, R., & Hahn, R. W. (1993). Trading in greenhouse permits: A critical examination of design and implementation issues. Faculty Research Working Paper R93-15. Cambridge, Harvard University.
  30. Stokey, N. L. (1998). Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review, 39, 1–31.
  31. The Allen Consulting Group (2000) Greenhouse gas emissions trading: Allocation of permits. Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra.
  32. Tietenberg, T. (2002). The tradable permits approach to protecting the commons: What have we learned?. In E. Ostrom et al., The Drama of the Commons (pp. 197–232). Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, National Academy Press.