User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Is a methodology available that accurately measures the cost of an FDG-PET study?

Primary tabs

Krug, Bruno [MONT] Pirson, Anne-Sophie [UCL] Crott, Ralph Vander Borght, Thierry [UCL]
Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Editorial
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2007
Journal information "European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging" - Vol. 34, no. 5, p. 625-7 (2007)
Peer reviewed yes
issn 1619-7070
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - MD/MINT - Département de médecine interne
MESH Subject Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Diagnostic Imaging - economics ; Economics, Medical ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - diagnostic use ; Humans ; Positron-Emission Tomography - economics - methods ; Radiopharmaceuticals - diagnostic use
Links
  1. Blackmore CC, Smith WJ. Economic analyses of radiological procedures: a methodological evaluation of the medical literature. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:123–30.
  2. Gambhir SS. Economics of nuclear medicine. Introduction. Q J Nucl Med 2000;44:103–4.
  3. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 2002;20:443–54.
  4. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs.New York: Oxford University Press;1997.
  5. Nisenbaum HL, Birnbaum BA, Myers MM, Grossman RI, Gefter WB, Langlotz CP. The costs of CT procedures in an academic radiology department determined by an activity-based costing (ABC) method. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:813–23.
  6. Chuck A, Jacobs P, Logus JW, St Hilaire D, Chmielowiec C, McEwan AJ. Marginal cost of operating a positron emission tomography center in a regulatory environment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:442–51.
  7. Monge P. The importance of activity-based methods in radiology and the technology that now makes this possible. Radiol Manage 2006;28:52–5.
  8. Baker J. Activity-based costing and activity-based management for health care. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1998.
  9. Canby JB 4th. Applying activity-based costing to healthcare settings. Healthc Financ Manage 1995;49:50–52, 54–6.
  10. Gabram SG, Mendola RA, Rozenfeld J, Gamelli RL. Why activity-based costing works. Physician Exec 1997;23:31–7.
  11. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev 2004;82:131–8, 150.
  12. Cohen Mervyn D., Hawes Donald R., Hutchins Gary D., McPhee William D., LaMasters Michael B., Fallon Robert P., Activity-based Cost Analysis: A Method of Analyzing the Financial and Operating Performance of Academic Radiology Departments, 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn45708
  13. Player S. Activity-based analyses lead to better decision making. Healthc Financ Manage 1998;52:66–70.
  14. Aird B. Activity-based cost management in health care—another fad? Int J Health Care Qual Assur 1996;9:16–9.
  15. Adam T, Koopmanschap MA, Evans DB. Cost-effectiveness analysis: can we reduce variability in costing methods? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:407–20.
  16. Negrini D, Kettle A, Sheppard L, Mills GH, Edbrooke DL. The cost of a hospital ward in Europe: is there a methodology available to accurately measure the costs? J Health Organ Manag 2004;18:195–206.
Bibliographic reference Krug, Bruno ; Pirson, Anne-Sophie ; Crott, Ralph ; Vander Borght, Thierry. Is a methodology available that accurately measures the cost of an FDG-PET study?. In: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, Vol. 34, no. 5, p. 625-7 (2007)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/29648