User menu

Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets

Bibliographic reference Ooghe, Erwin ; Schokkaert, Erik ; Van de gaer, Dirk. Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets. In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 28, no. 2, p. 209-230 (Février 2007)
Permanent URL
  1. Bossert W (1995) Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Math Soc Sci 29:1–17
  2. Bossert W (1997) Opportunity sets and individual well-being. Soc Choice Welfare 14:97–112
  3. Bossert W, Fleurbaey M (1996) Redistribution and compensation. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 343–356
  4. Bossert W, Fleurbaey M, Van de gaer D (1999) Redistribution, talent and compensation: a second best analysis. Rev Econ Design 4:35–55
  5. Bossert Walter, Weymark John A., Utility in Social Choice, Handbook of Utility Theory (2004) ISBN:9781441954176 p.1099-1177, 10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_7
  6. Fleurbaey M (1994) On fair compensation. Theory Decision 36:277–307
  7. Fleurbaey M (1995a) The requisites of equal opportunity. In: Barnett WA, Moulin H, Salles M, Schofield NJ (eds) Social choice, welfare and ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–53
  8. Fleurbaey M (1995b) Three solutions to the compensation problem. J Econ Theory 65:505–521
  9. Fleurbaey M (1998) Equality among responsible individuals. In: Laslier JF, Fleurbaey M, Gravel N, Trannoy A (eds), Freedom in economics: new perspectives in normative economics. Routledge, London, pp 206–234
  10. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2004) Compensation and responsibility, forthcoming. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, Vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam
  11. Hammond PJ (1976) Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica 44:793–804
  12. Hild M, Voorhoeve A (2004) Equality of opportunity and opportunity dominance. Econ Philos 20:117–145
  13. Iturbe-Ormaetxe I (1997) Redistribution and individual factors. Rev Econ Design 3:45–55
  14. Kolm S-C (2001) To each according to her work? Just entitlement from action: desert, merit, responsibility, and equal opportunities. mimeo
  15. Kranich L (1996) Equitable opportunities: an axiomatic approach. J Econ Theory 71:132–147
  16. Llavador HG, Roemer J (2001) An equal opportunity approach to the allocation of international aid. J Dev Econ 64:147–171
  17. Maniquet F (1998) An equal right solution to the compensation-responsibility dilemma. Math Soc Sci 35:185–202
  18. Maniquet F (2004) On the equivalence between welfarism and equality of opportunity. Soc Choice Welfare 23:127–147
  19. Ok EA, Kranich L (1998) The measurement of opportunity inequality: a cardinality-based approach. Soc Choice Welfare 15:263–287
  20. Ooghe E, Lauwers L (2005) Non-dictatorial extensive social choice. Econ Theory 25:721–743
  21. Roberts KWS (1995) Values opinions or opiniated values: the double aggregation problem. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (eds), Social choice re-examined. In: Proceedings of the IEA conference held at Schloss Hernstein, IEA conference volumes 116–117, Macmillan, Houndmills
  22. Roemer JE (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Public Affairs 22:146–166
  23. Roemer JE (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  24. Roemer JE (2002) Equality of opportunity: a progress report. Soc Choice Welfare 19:455–471
  25. Roemer JE, Aaberge R, Colombino U, Fritzell J, Jenkins SP, Marx I, Page M, Pommer E, Ruiz-Castillo J, San Segundo MJ, Tranaes T, Wagner GG, Zubiri I (2003) To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens?. J Public Econ 87:539–565
  26. Schokkaert E, Van de gaer D, Vandenbroucke F, Luttens RI (2004) Responsibility sensitive egalitarianism and optimal linear income taxation. Math Soc Sci 48:151–182
  27. van de gaer D (1993) Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital. KULeuven, Leuven
  28. Van de gaer D, Schokkaert E, Martinez M (2001) Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica 68:519–537