User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Case Law Commentary : European Court of Human Rights [GC], decision on Admissibility of 5 may 2020, M.N. and others v. Belgium, appl. no 3599/18 - Humanitarian visa: Does the suspended step of the stork become a hunting permit?

Primary tabs

download
  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 837.80 K
Sarolea, Sylvie [UCL] Frasca, Eleonora [UCL]

The European Court of Human Rights declared the case M.N. and others v. Belgium inadmissible by excluding that Belgium exercised extraterritorial jurisdiction over a family of Syrians requesting humanitarian visas from the Belgian embassy in Beirut. With its assessment as to jurisdiction, the Court insists upon keeping the status quo of access to asylum procedures

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès libre
Publication date 2020
Language Anglais
Journal information "Cahiers de l'EDEM" - Vol. juin 2020, p. 1-40
Publisher Centre Charles De Visscher pour le droit international et européen (Louvain-la-Neuve)
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SSH/JURI/PJIE - Droit international et européen
Keywords ECtHR – Article 1 ECHR – Extraterritorial jurisdiction – Inadmissibility – Humanitarian visa – Article 6 ECHR – Civil rights – Asylum seekers’ access to the EU – Access to justice
Links
Bibliographic reference Sarolea, Sylvie ; Frasca, Eleonora ; et. al. Case Law Commentary : European Court of Human Rights [GC], decision on Admissibility of 5 may 2020, M.N. and others v. Belgium, appl. no 3599/18 - Humanitarian visa: Does the suspended step of the stork become a hunting permit?. In: Cahiers de l'EDEM, Vol. juin 2020, p. 1-40
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/230997