User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain | Saint-Louis

Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests

  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 364.86 K
  1. Beddington, J. et al. Letter from scientists to the EU parliament regarding forest biomass. Available at: http://empowerplants.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/scientist-letter-on-eu-forest-biomass-796-signatories-as-of-january-16-2018.pdf (2018).
  2. European Commission. IMPACT ASSESSMENT Sustainability of Bioenergy (European Commission, Brussels, 2016).
  3. PricewaterhouseCoopers EU Services EESV’s consortium. Sustainable and optimal use of biomass for energy in the EU beyond 2020 (2017).
  4. IEA. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2017 (IEA, Paris, 2017).
  5. Walker, S., Lyddan, C., Perritt, W. & Pilla, L. An Analysis of UK Biomass Power Policy, US South Pellet Production and Impacts on Wood Fiber Markets (RISI, 2015).
  6. Laganière Jérôme, Paré David, Thiffault Evelyne, Bernier Pierre Y., Range and uncertainties in estimating delays in greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy sourced from Canadian forests, 10.1111/gcbb.12327
  7. Mitchell Stephen R., Harmon Mark E., O'Connell Kari E. B., Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01173.x
  8. Stephenson, A. L. & MacKay, D. J. C. Life cycle impacts of biomass electricity in 2020 (Department of Energy & Climate Change, London, 2014).
  9. Bernier Pierre, Paré David, Using ecosystem CO2measurements to estimate the timing and magnitude of greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01197.x
  10. Holtsmark Bjart, Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt, 10.1007/s10584-011-0222-6
  11. Hudiburg Tara W., Law Beverly E., Wirth Christian, Luyssaert Sebastiaan, Regional carbon dioxide implications of forest bioenergy production, 10.1038/nclimate1264
  12. McKechnie Jon, Colombo Steve, Chen Jiaxin, Mabee Warren, MacLean Heather L., Forest Bioenergy or Forest Carbon? Assessing Trade-Offs in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Wood-Based Fuels, 10.1021/es1024004
  13. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Massachusetts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (2010).
  14. Zanchi Giuliana, Pena Naomi, Bird Neil, Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x
  15. Holtsmark Bjart, The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass, 10.1111/gcbb.12015
  16. Booth Mary S, Not carbon neutral: Assessing the net emissions impact of residues burned for bioenergy, 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac88
  17. IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IGES, Kitakyushu, 2006).
  18. Hennenberg, K., Böttcher, H., Fehrenbach, H. & Bischoff, M. Short analysis of the RED 2009, the iLUC Directive 2015 and the 2016 RED proposal regarding implications for nature protection (Oeko-Institute and IFEU, Berlin, Darmstadt, Heidelberg, 2017).
  19. European Environment Agency. Renewable energy in Europe – 2017 Update. Recent growth and knock-on effects (European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 2017).
  20. Biofuture Platform. Biofuture@COP23: Major countries agree to scale up the low carbon bioeconomy and develop sustainable biofuels targets. Available at: http://biofutureplatform.org/major-countries-agree-scale-low-carbon-bioeconomy-develop-sustainable-biofuels-targets/ (2017).
  21. Doyle, A. & Roche, A. Nineteen nations say they’ll use more bioenergy to slow climate change. Reuters.  Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-accord-biofuels/nineteen-nations-say-theyll-use-more-bioenergy-to-slow-climate-change-idUSKBN1DG2DO (2017).
  22. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, Sec. 428, Pub. L. 115-31 (115th Cong), 131 Stat. 500. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ31/PLAW-115publ31.pdf (2017). 
  23. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Sec. 431, Pub. L. 115-141 (115th Cong). Available at: https://www.aila.org/infonet/house-bill-consolidated-appropriations-act-2018 (2018).
  24. Smeets Edward M. W., Faaij André P. C., Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050 : An assessment of the drivers that determine the potentials, 10.1007/s10584-006-9163-x
  25. Searchinger, T. & Lucht, W. Why ‘sustainable forest management’ does not make wood a good climate alternative to fossil fuels. euractiv.comAvailable at: http://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/opinion/why-sustainable-forest-management-does-not-make-wood-a-good-climate-alternative-to-fossil-fuels/ (2018).
  26. Cowie, A., Berndes, G., Junginger, M. & Ximenes, F. Response to Chatham House report “Woody Biomass for Power and Heat: Impacts on the Global Climate” (2018).
  27. Berndes, G. et al. Forest Biomass, Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change Mitigation. (European Forest Institute, Vienna, 2016).
  28. Ter-Mikaelian, M. T., Colombo, S. J. & Chen, J. The Burning Question: Does Forest Bioenergy Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Review of Common Misconceptions about Forest Carbon Accounting. J. For. 113, 57–68 (2015).
  29. Pan Y., Birdsey R. A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P. E., Kurz W. A., Phillips O. L., Shvidenko A., Lewis S. L., Canadell J. G., Ciais P., Jackson R. B., Pacala S. W., McGuire A. D., Piao S., Rautiainen A., Sitch S., Hayes D., A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests, 10.1126/science.1201609
  30. Krausmann F., Erb K.-H., Gingrich S., Haberl H., Bondeau A., Gaube V., Lauk C., Plutzar C., Searchinger T. D., Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century, 10.1073/pnas.1211349110
  31. European Commission. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). (2016).
  32. Searchinger T. D., Hamburg S. P., Melillo J., Chameides W., Havlik P., Kammen D. M., Likens G. E., Lubowski R. N., Obersteiner M., Oppenheimer M., Philip Robertson G., Schlesinger W. H., David Tilman G., Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error, 10.1126/science.1178797
  33. FAO. The agriculture sectors in the intended nationally determined contributions: analysis. (Rome, 2016).
  34. Searchinger Timothy D., Beringer Tim, Strong Asa, Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.016
  35. Kammen D. M., Sunter D. A., City-integrated renewable energy for urban sustainability, 10.1126/science.aad9302
  36. Natural Resources Defense Council. Money to Burn II: Solar and Wind Can Reliably Supply the United Kingdom’s New Electricity Needs More Cost-Effectively Than Biomass (2017).
  37. P. Smith et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. O. Edenhofer et al.) (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2014).
Bibliographic reference Searchinger, Timothy D. ; Beringer, Tim ; Holtsmark, Bjart ; Kammen, Daniel M. ; Lambin, Eric ; et. al. Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests. In: Nature Communications, Vol. 9, no.1, p. 4 (2018)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/213873