The Timed Up and Go Test in Children: Does Protocol Choice Matter? A Systematic Review.

Verbecque, Evi Schepens, Kirsten Theré, Joke Schepens, Bénédicte [UCL] Klingels, Katrijn Hallemans, Ann

(eng) PURPOSE: Results on reliability and normative data for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in children who are developing typically are systematically reviewed. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: Six different TUG protocols are presented for which normative data are available for ages 3 to 18 years. TUG time is consistent within and between raters and sessions and is influenced by age. The choice of protocol, self-selected versus fastest walking speed, and use of a motivational aspect and of the outcome calculation affect TUG time as well as its consistency within and between sessions. CONCLUSIONS: A standard protocol for the TUG is lacking and should be developed with attention to reliability. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: If the TUG is to be used as a screening tool for dynamic balance control, clinicians need to apply protocols that include fastest walking speed motivation.