User menu

Rational numbers : componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task

Bibliographic reference Meert, Gaëlle ; Grégoire, Jacques ; Noël, Marie-Pascale. Rational numbers : componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task. In: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), Vol. 62, no. 8, p. 1598-616 (2009)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/20861
  1. Behr M. J., Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics, 296 (1992)
  2. Bonato Mario, Fabbri Sara, Umiltà Carlo, Zorzi Marco, The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer?, 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1410
  3. Dehaene Stanislas, Bossini Serge, Giraux Pascal, The mental representation of parity and number magnitude., 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
  4. Dehaene Stanislas, Dupoux Emmanuel, Mehler Jacques, Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison., 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626
  5. English L. D., Mathematics education: Models and processes (1995)
  6. Field A., Discovering statistics using SPSS (2005)
  7. Fischer M. H., Psychology Science, 47, 22 (2005)
  8. Gallistel C.R., Gelman Rochel, Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers, 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01424-2
  9. Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R. and Cordes, S. The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. Culture and evolution: A Fyssen Foundation symposium. Cambridge, MA. Edited by: Jaisson, P. and Levinson, S. C. pp.247–274. MIT Press.
  10. Gevers W., Psychology Science, 47, 10 (2005)
  11. Grégoire J., La dyscalculie. Trouble du développement numérique chez l'enfant, 223 (2005)
  12. Hair J. F., Multivariate data analysis (1998)
  13. Hartnett Patrice, Gelman Rochel, Early understandings of numbers: paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings?, 10.1016/s0959-4752(97)00026-1
  14. Howell D. C., Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines (1998)
  15. Hubbard Edward M., Piazza Manuela, Pinel Philippe, Dehaene Stanislas, Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex, 10.1038/nrn1684
  16. Mack N. K., Rational numbers. An integration of research, 85 (1993)
  17. MOYER ROBERT S., LANDAUER THOMAS K., Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality, 10.1038/2151519a0
  18. Ni Yujing, Zhou Yong-Di, Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias, 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
  19. Nuerk H. C., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 835 (2004)
  20. Nuerk Hans-Christoph, Weger Ulrich, Willmes Klaus, Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins, 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00142-1
  21. Nuerk H. C., Psychology Science, 47, 52 (2005)
  22. Ratinckx Elie, Brysbaert Marc, Fias Wim, Naming two-digit Arabic numerals: Evidence from masked priming studies., 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1150
  23. Reynvoet Bert, Brysbaert Marc, Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line, 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00048-7
  24. Shaki Samuel, Petrusic William M., On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments, 10.3758/bf03196788
  25. Sophian C., Children's numbers (1996)
  26. Stafylidou Stamatia, Vosniadou Stella, The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
  27. Tzelgov Joseph, Henik Avishai, Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications., 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524
  28. Verguts T., Experimental Psychology, 52, 195 (2005)
  29. Whalen John, Gallistel C.R., Gelman Rochel, Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation, 10.1111/1467-9280.00120
  30. Zhang J., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 817 (2005)
  31. Zhou Xinlin, Chen Chuansheng, Chen Lan, Dong Qi, Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task, 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.003