User menu

Feeling good, but lacking autonomy: Closed-mindedness on social and moral issues in new religious movements.

Bibliographic reference Buxant, Coralie ; Saroglou, Vassilis. Feeling good, but lacking autonomy: Closed-mindedness on social and moral issues in new religious movements.. In: Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 47, no. 1, p. 17-31 (2008)
Permanent URL
  1. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
  2. Aronoff, J., Lynn, S. J., & Malinoski, P. (2000). Are cultic environments psychologically harmful? Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 91–111.
  3. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.
  4. Batson, C. D., & Raynor-Prince, L. (1983). Religious orientation and complexity of thought about existential concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 38–50.
  5. Batson, C. D., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1991). Measuring religion as quest: I. Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 416–429.
  6. Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P. A., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Batson, C. D., & Stocks, E. L. (2004). Religion: Its core psychological functions. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 141–155). New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Buxant, C., Saroglou, V., Casalfiore, S., & Christians, L.-L. (2007). Cognitive and emotional characteristics of New Religious Movement members: New questions and data on the mental health issue. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 10, 219–238.
  9. Buxant, C., & Saroglou, V. (in press). Joining and leaving a New Religious Movement: A study of ex-members’ mental health. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture.
  10. Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., &. Barbaranelli C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.
  11. Dawson, L. L. (2006). Comprehending cults: The sociology of New Religious Movements. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Deconchy, J.-P. (1980). Orthodoxie religieuse et sciences humaines [Religious orthodoxy and human sciences]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
  13. Freud, S. (1927/1961). The future of an illusion (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: Norton.
  14. Fulton, A. S. (1997). Identity status, religious orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 1–11.
  15. Galanter, M. (1999). Cults: Faith, healing, and coercion (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Gartner, J., Larson, D. B., & Allen, G. D. (1991). Religious commitment and mental health: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 6–25.
  17. Gorsuch, R. L., & McFarland, S. G. (1972). Single vs. multiple-item scales for measuring religious values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53–64.
  18. Hunsberger, B., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807–826.
  19. Klaassen, D. W., & McDonald, M. J. (2002). Quest and identity development: Re-examining pathways for existential search. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 189–200.
  20. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648–662.
  21. Lilliston, L., & Shephered, G. (1999). New Religious Movements and mental health. In B. Wilson & J. Cresswell (Eds.), New Religious Movements: Challenge and response (pp. 121–139). London: Routledge.
  22. Marty, M. E., & Appleby R. S. (Eds.). (1995). Fundamentalisms comprehended. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  23. Murken, S., & Namini, S. (2003). Becoming a member of a religious group: Psychological perspectives. Paper presented at the International Association for the Psychology of Religion conference, Glasgow, Great Britain.
  24. Nucci, L., & Turiel, E. (1993). God’s word, religious rules, and their relation to Christian and Jewish children’s concepts of morality. Child Development, 64, 1475–1491.
  25. Paulhus Delroy L., Measurement and Control of Response Bias, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1991) ISBN:9780125902410 p.17-59, 10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x
  26. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., De Grada, E., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405–417.
  27. Richardson, J. T. (1995). Clinical and personality assessment of participants in new religions. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 145–170.
  28. Rosenzweig, S. (1948). The Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study: Revised form for adults. St. Louis, MO: Author.
  29. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437–448.
  30. Saliba, J. A. (2004). Psychology and the New Religious Movements. In J. R. Lewis (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of New Religious Movements (pp. 317–332). New York: Oxford University Press.
  31. Saroglou, V. (2002). Beyond dogmatism: The need for closure as related to religion. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 5, 183–194.
  32. Saroglou, V. (2003). Spiritualité moderne: Un regard de psychologie de la religion [Modern spirituality: A psychology of religion perspective]. Revue Théologique de Louvain, 34, 473–504.
  33. Saroglou Vassilis, Galand Philippe, Identities, Values, and Religion: A Study Among Muslim, Other Immigrant, and Native Belgian Young Adults After the 9/11 Attacks, 10.1207/s1532706xid0402_1
  34. Saroglou Vassilis, Mathijsen François, Religion, multiple identities, and acculturation: A study of Muslim immigrants in Belgium, 10.1163/008467207x188757
  35. Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer-ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323–348.
  36. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734.
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances, empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  38. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.
  39. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107.
  40. Smetana, J. G., & Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child Development, 65, 1147–1162.
  41. Spilka, B., Hood, R. W. Jr., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (3d ed). New York: Guilford Press.
  42. Tournois, J., Mesnil, F., & Kop, J.-L. (2000). Self-deception and other-deception: A social desirability questionnaire. European Review of Applied Psychology, 50, 219–233.
  43. Troeltsch, E. (1931). The social teaching of the Christian churches (O. Wyon, Trans.). London: Allen and Unwin (Original work published 1912).
  44. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and social convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 133–173.
  46. Wilson, B. (1970). Religious sects: A sociological study. London: Weidenfeld.