User menu

Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer.

Bibliographic reference Pourjavan, S. ; Boghossian, P ; Detry-Morel, M.. Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer.. In: International ophthalmology, Vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1-5 (2010)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/19700
  1. Flammer J, Orgül S (1998) Optic nerve blood-flow abnormalities in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:267–289
  2. Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, Renard JP, Stefánsson E (2002) The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:359–393
  3. Grieshaber MC, Flammer J (2005) Blood flow in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:79–83
  4. Hoffmann EM, Grus F-H, Pfeiffer N (2004) Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 4:1–7
  5. Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, Grus F, Beck S, Pfeiffer N (2002) Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 86:981–984
  6. Williamson TH, Harris A (1996) Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit. Surv Ophthalmol 40:255–267
  7. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Roberts YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14:344–350
  8. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF (2005) The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1572–1575
  9. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOVS 45:3118–3121
  10. Pourjavan S, Boëlle PY, Detry-Morel M, De Potter P (2007) Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal). Int Ophthalmol 27:357–360
  11. Vulsteke C, Satlmans I, Fieuw S, Zeyen T (2008). Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:559–565
  12. Barreto Jr Jackson, Babic Mirko, Vessani Roberto Murad, Susanna Jr. Remo, Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus, 10.1590/s1807-59322006000600004
  13. Pourjavan S, Deghislghe C, Van Maelderen , Zeyen T (2005) Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry. Does it matter? Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 296:51–55
  14. Lachkar Y (2006) I have tested for you. The contour tonometer. IOP analysis using “Dynamic Contour Tonometry”. J Fr Ophthalmol 29:32–35
  15. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658–665
  16. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763–767
  17. Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S (2007) Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer. J Fr Ophtalmol 30:260–270
  18. Herdener S, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2007) Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)—a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 24:1027–1030
  19. Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2008) Is the PASCAL-tonometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine? Long- and short-term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:39–43
  20. Georgopoulos GT, Diestelhorst M, Fisher R, Ruokonen P, Krieglstein GK (2002) The short-term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:54–58