Jeger, Michael
[Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London]
Bragard, Claude
[UCL]
Candresse, Thierry
[Institut National de la Recerche Agronomique (INRA). Plant virus Team]
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
[Agricultural University of Athens, Department of Crop Science, Plant Pathology Laboratory]
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
[Coventry University, UK, Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR)]
Gilioli, Gianni
[University of Brescia, Medical School, Department of Molecular and Transitional Medicine]
Gregoire, Jean‐Claude
[Université Libre de Bruxelles, Interfaculty School of Bioengineers]
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
[IOBC-WPRS]
MacLeod, Alan
[Department for environment food and rural affairs (Defra), Chief Plant Health Officer’s Unit]
Navarro, Maria Navajas
[Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)]
Niere, Björn
[Julius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland]
Parnell, Stephen
[University of Salford, Mancheste]
Potting, Roel
[Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. Office for Risk Assessment and Research]
Rafoss, Trond
[Bioforsk - Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research. Plant Health and Plant Protection Division]
Rossi, Vittorio
[Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di scienze agrarie, alimentari e ambientali, Department of Sustainable Crop Production]
Urek, Gregor
[Agricultural institute of Slovenia - Kmetijski inštitut Slovenije, Ljubljana, Slovenia]
Van Bruggen, Ariena
[University of Florida]
Van der Werf, Wopke
[Wageningen University. Department of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis]
West, Jonathan
[Rothamsted Research, Department of Plant Biology and Crop Science]
Winter, Stephan
[Plant Virus Department, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, DSMZ GmbH]
Dickinson, Matthew
[University of Nottingham]
Marzachi, Cristina
[Italian National Research Council | CNR · Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante IPSP]
Hollo, Gabor
[European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)]
Caffier, David
[High Council for biotechnology]
The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation for the Witches’ broom disease of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) phytoplasma for the EU territory. The pest has been reported in a few countries in the Middle East and is not known to occur in the EU. The disease is caused by a well-defined phytoplasma strain in the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’ species, for which efficient molecular detection assays are available. The most important known natural host is Citrus aurantifolia, which is only grown for ornamental purposes in the EU. Sweet limes, rough lemon and trifoliate orange are also naturally infected by that phytoplasma. The latter can be transmitted by grafting also to some citrus species. Other citrus species were reported to be resistant; however, their susceptibility has been assessed only by symptom observations, and the possible presence of phytoplasmas in symptomless plants cannot be ruled out. The phytoplasma is transmitted by the leafhopper Hishimonus phycitis, which is not known to occur in the EU. There is no information on the vector status of other phloem feeding insects of citrus present in the EU. The pest is listed in Annex IIAI of Directive 2000/29/EC. The main pathways for entry, plants for planting and the vector insect, are closed by existing legislation on import of citrus plants. Nevertheless, should the pest enter, it could establish and spread. In countries where Witches’ broom disease of lime (WBDL) is present, it has significant impact. The main knowledge gaps concern (1) and vertical transmission of the phytoplasma to H. phycitis eggs (2) lack of information regarding susceptibility of citrus crops grown in the EU (3) status of potential insect vectors in the EU. Therefore, the WBDL phytoplasma meets the criteria assessed by EFSA for consideration as a potential Union quarantine pest.
Al-Abadi Shaikha Y., Al-Sadi Abdullah M., Dickinson Matthew, Al-Hammadi Mohammed S., Al-Shariqi Rashid, Al-Yahyai Rashid A., Kazerooni Elham A., Bertaccini Assunta, Population genetic analysis reveals a low level of genetic diversity of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’ causing witches’ broom disease in lime, 10.1186/s40064-016-3401-0
Al-Ghaithi Aisha G., Hanif Muhammad Asif, Al-Busaidi Walid M., Al-Sadi Abdullah M., Increased sodium and fluctuations in minerals in acid limes expressing witches’ broom symptoms, 10.1186/s40064-016-2049-0
Alhudaib K., Arocha Y., Wilson M., Jones P., Molecular identification, potential vectors and alternative hosts of the phytoplasma associated with a lime decline disease in Saudi Arabia, 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.08.007
Al-Sadi A. M., Al-Moqbali H. S., Al-Yahyai R. A., Al-Said F. A., AFLP data suggest a potential role for the low genetic diversity of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) in Oman in the outbreak of witches’ broom disease of lime, 10.1007/s10681-012-0728-7
Al-Yahyai R., Khan I., Al-Said F., Al-Sadi A., Al-Wahaibi A., Deadman M., STATUS OF CITRUS AURANTIFOLIA INFECTED WITH WITCHES' BROOM DISEASE OF LIME IN OMAN, 10.17660/actahortic.2012.928.50
Al-Zadjali A. D., Natsuaki T., Okuda S., Detection, Identification and Molecular Characterization of a Phytoplasma Associated with Arabian Jasmine (Jasminum sambac L.) Witches? Broom in Oman, 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01219.x
Askari N., Evaluation of Anti-Phytoplasma Properties of Surfactin and Tetracycline Towards Lime Witches’ Broom Disease Using Real-Time PCR, 10.4014/jmb.1007.07047
Azadvar, Journal of Agrotechnical Biotechnology, 6, 15 (2015)
Bové, Arab Journal of Plant Protection, 18, 148 (2000)
, Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA : Harmonised framework for pest risk assessment in the EU, 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1495
EFSA PLH Panel, EFSA Journal, 15, 5037 (2017)
EPPO, EPPO Bulletin, 36, 117 (2006)
Faghihi M. M., Bagheri A. N., Bahrami H. R., Hasanzadeh H., Rezazadeh R., Siampour M., Samavi S., Salehi M., Izadpanah K., Witches'-Broom Disease of Lime Affects Seed Germination and Seedling Growth But Is Not Seed Transmissible, 10.1094/pdis-06-10-0400
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2004. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 21—Pest risk analysis of regulated non‐quarantine pests. FAO, Rome, 30 pp. Available online: https://www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents//1323945746_ISPM_21_2004_En_2011-11-29_Refor.pdf
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2013. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 11—Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests. FAO, Rome, 36 pp. Available online: https://www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents/20140512/ispm_11_2013_en_2014-04-30_201405121523-494.65%20KB.pdf
Ghosh Dilip, Bhose Sumit, Manimekalai R., Gowda S., Molecular detection of Candidatus Phytoplasma spp. causing witches’ broom disease of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) in India, 10.1007/s13562-012-0160-z
Hemmati Chamran, Nikooei Mehrnoosh, Molecular characterization of a Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia-related strain associated with Zinnia elegans phyllody disease in Iran, 10.1007/s13314-017-0234-9
, 'Candidatus Phytoplasma', a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects, 10.1099/ijs.0.02854-0
Khan A. J., Botti S., Al-Subhi A. M., Gundersen-Rindal D. E., Bertaccini A. F., Molecular Identification of a New Phytoplasma Associated with Alfalfa Witches'-Broom in Oman, 10.1094/phyto.2002.92.10.1038
Mariano C, 2017. Personal communication. E‐mail message to Gabor Hollo on the 4th of July 2017
Martini Marta, Marcone Carmine, Lee Ing-Ming, Firrao Giuseppe, The Family Acholeplasmataceae (Including Phytoplasmas), The Prokaryotes (2014) ISBN:9783642301193 p.469-504, 10.1007/978-3-642-30120-9_387
Mirzaie A., Esmailzadeh-Hosseini S. A., Jafari-Nodoshan A., Rahimian H., Molecular Characterization and Potential Insect Vector of a Phytoplasma Associated with Garden Beet Witches? Broom in Yazd, Iran, 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01214.x
Moghal SS, Zidgali AD and Moustafa SS, 1998. Natural host range and reaction of citrus species to Witches’ broom disease of lime (WBDL) in Oman. Proc. IPM Con. SQU, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. 23‐35 Feb. 1998.
Najafinia, Indian Phytopathology, 69, 330 (2016)
Saleh, Journal of Plant Pathology, 98, 83 (2016)
Salehi M., Izadpanah K., Siampour M., Bagheri A., Faghihi S. M., Transmission of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’ to Bakraee (Citrus reticulata Hybrid) by Feral Hishimonus phycitis Leafhoppers in Iran, 10.1094/pdis-91-4-0466c
Siampour M., Izadpanah K., Galetto L., Salehi M., Marzachí C., Molecular characterization, phylogenetic comparison and serological relationship of the Imp protein of several ‘CandidatusPhytoplasma aurantifolia’ strains : impgene in ‘CandidatusPhytoplasma aurantifolia’, 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02662.x
Weisburg W G, Tully J G, Rose D L, Petzel J P, Oyaizu H, Yang D, Mandelco L, Sechrest J, Lawrence T G, Van Etten J, A phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas: basis for their classification., 10.1128/jb.171.12.6455-6467.1989
Yadav A., Thorat V., Shouche Y., Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia (16SrII Group) Associated with Witches’ Broom Disease of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus) in India, 10.1094/pdis-05-15-0534-pdn
Zina Vera, da Silva Elsa Borges, Quartau José Alberto, Franco José Carlos, First report of the citrus leafhopper Penthimiola bella (Stål) (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) in Europe, 10.1007/s12600-013-0312-2
Zreik, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 45, 449 (1995)
Bibliographic reference
Jeger, Michael ; Bragard, Claude ; Candresse, Thierry ; Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet ; Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina ; et. al. Pest categorisation of Witches' broom disease of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) phytoplasma. In: EFSA Journal, Vol. 15, no.10, p. 1-22 (2017)