User menu

Defending Scientific Realism Without Relying on Inference to the Best Explanation

Bibliographic reference Ghins, Michel. Defending Scientific Realism Without Relying on Inference to the Best Explanation. In: Axiomathes (Online) : an international journal in ontology and cognitive systems, Vol. 27, no. 6, p. 635–651 (2017)
Permanent URL
  1. Alai Mario, Levin and Ghins on the “no miracle” argument and naturalism, 10.1007/s13194-011-0028-4
  2. Blondeau Julien, Ghins Michel, Is There an Intrinsic Criterion for Causal Lawlike Statements?, 10.1080/02698595.2012.748496
  3. Boyd R (1981) Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology. In: Asquith PD, Nickles T (eds) PSA 1980, vol 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp 613–662
  4. Braithwaite RB (1953) Scientific explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  5. Douven I (2017) Abduction. In: Zalta E (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
  6. Ghins Michel, Scientific Realism and Invariance, 10.2307/1522866
  7. Ghins Michel, Putnam’s No-Miracle Argument: A Critique, Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science (2002) ISBN:9789048161072 p.121-137, 10.1007/978-94-017-2862-1_6
  8. Ghins Michel, Selective Scientific Realism: Representation, Objectivity and Truth, Varieties of Scientific Realism (2017) ISBN:9783319516073 p.109-131, 10.1007/978-3-319-51608-0_6
  9. Ghins M (2018) Mechanistic explanation: an extension and a defence. In: Falkenburg B, Schiemann G (eds) Mechanistic explanations, computability and complex systems. Proceedings of the international academy of science conference. Dortmund, Oct 2016. Springer, Berlin (in press)
  10. Levin M (1984) What kind of explanation is truth? In: Leplin J (ed) Scientific realism. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 124–139
  11. Lipton P (2004) Inference to the best explanation, 2nd edn. 1st edition 1991. Routledge, London
  12. Mill JS (1911) A system of logic: raciocinative and inductive. Longmans, Green and Co., London
  13. Nola Robert, The Optimistic Meta-Induction and Ontological Continuity: the Case of the Electron, Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (2008) ISBN:9781402062742 p.159-202, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_12
  14. Psillos S (1999) Scientific realism. How science tracks truth. Routledge, London
  15. Psillos Stathis, Moving Molecules Above the Scientific Horizon: On Perrin’s Case for Realism, 10.1007/s10838-011-9165-x
  16. Psillos Stathis, The View from Within and the View from Above: Looking at van Fraassen’s Perrin, Bas van Fraassen’s Approach to Representation and Models in Science (2014) ISBN:9789400778375 p.143-166, 10.1007/978-94-007-7838-2_7
  17. Putnam H (1978) Meaning and the moral sciences. Routledge, London
  18. Sankey H (2008) Scientific realism and the rationality of science. Ashgate, Aldershot
  19. Fraassen Bas. C. van, The Scientific Image, ISBN:9780198244271, 10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
  20. Fraassen Bas C. van, Laws and Symmetry, ISBN:9780198248606, 10.1093/0198248601.001.0001
  21. van Fraassen B (2002) The empirical stance. Yale University Press, New Haven
  22. van Fraassen B (2005) Wouldn’t it be lovely? Explanation and scientific realism. In: Review symposium for Lipton, inference to the best explanation, 2nd edn. Metascience 14: 344–352
  23. van Fraassen Bas C., Scientific Representation, ISBN:9780199278220, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278220.001.0001
  24. van Fraassen Bas C., Misdirection and Misconception in the Scientific Realism Debates, Varieties of Scientific Realism (2017) ISBN:9783319516073 p.95-108, 10.1007/978-3-319-51608-0_5
  25. Musgrave Alan, Strict Empiricism Versus Explanation in Science, Varieties of Scientific Realism (2017) ISBN:9783319516073 p.71-93, 10.1007/978-3-319-51608-0_4