User menu

Progressive treatment and self-assessment: effects on students’ automatisation of grammatical spelling and self-efficacy beliefs

Bibliographic reference Van Reybroeck, Marie ; Penneman, Jessica ; Vidick, Charline ; Galand, Benoît. Progressive treatment and self-assessment: effects on students’ automatisation of grammatical spelling and self-efficacy beliefs. In: Reading and Writing : an interdisciplinary journal, Vol. 30, no. 9, p. 1965-1985 (28 June 2017)
Permanent URL
  1. Alamargot Denis, Flouret Lisa, Larocque Denis, Caporossi Gilles, Pontart Virginie, Paduraru Carmen, Morisset Pauline, Fayol Michel, Successful written subject–verb agreement: an online analysis of the procedure used by students in Grades 3, 5 and 12, 10.1007/s11145-014-9525-0
  2. Allal, L. (1999). Impliquer l’apprenant dans le processus d’évaluation: Promesses et pièges de l’autoévaluation. [Involve the learner in the assessment process: Promises and traps of self-assessment]. In C. Depover & B. Noël (Eds.), L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs (pp. 35–56). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  3. Anderson John R., Acquisition of cognitive skill., 10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369
  4. Anderson John R., ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition., 10.1037/0003-066x.51.4.355
  5. Andrade Heidi L., Wang Xiaolei, Du Ying, Akawi Robin L., Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing, 10.3200/joer.102.4.287-302
  6. Bandura, A. (2007). Auto-efficacité. Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. [Self-efficacy. Self-efficacy beliefs]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  7. Baneath, B., Boutard, C., & Alberti, C. (2006). Chronosdictées. Outil d’évaluation des performances orthographiques (avec et sans contrainte temporelle). [Chronosdictées. Assessment of spelling performances with and without time pressure]. Isbergues: Ortho Edition.
  8. Deci Edward L., Vallerand Robert J., Pelletier Luc G., Ryan Richard M., Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective, 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
  9. Duijnhouwer Hendrien, Prins Frans J., Stokking Karel M., Progress feedback effects on students' writing mastery goal, self-efficacy beliefs, and performance, 10.1080/13803611003711393
  10. Evans C., Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education, 10.3102/0034654312474350
  11. Fayol Michel, Got Constance, Automatisme et contrôle dans la production écrite : les erreurs d'accord sujet verbe chez l'enfant et l'adulte, 10.3406/psy.1991.29453
  12. Fayol Michel, Hupet Michel, Largy Pierre, 10.1023/a:1008038127807
  13. Galand Benoît, Philippot Pierre, Style motivationannel des évèves du secondaire: Developpement d'un instrument de mesure et relations avec d'autres variables pédagogiques., 10.1037/h0087179
  14. Hattie J., Timperley H., The Power of Feedback, 10.3102/003465430298487
  15. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  16. Hupet Michel, Fayol Michel, Schelstraete Marie-Anne, Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.x
  17. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Khomsi, A., Nanty, I., Pasquet, F., & Parbeau-Guéno, A. (2007). ECL-Collège. Evaluation des compétences linguistiques au collège. [Assessment of linguistic competences at secondary school]. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
  19. Kluger Avraham N., DeNisi Angelo, The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory., 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
  20. Logan Gordon D., Toward an instance theory of automatization., 10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492
  21. Nadeau, M. (1995). Propositions pour améliorer le transfert des connaissances en orthographe grammaticale. [Suggestions to improve grammatical spelling knowledge transfer]. Québec français, 99, 35–38.
  22. Negro Isabelle, Bonnotte Isabelle, Lété Bernard, Statistical learning of past participle inflections in French, 10.1007/s11145-013-9485-9
  23. Negro Isabelle, Chanquoy Lucile, Subject-verb agreement with present and imperfect tenses: A developmental study from 2nd to 7th grade, 10.1007/bf03173170
  24. Negro Isabelle, Chanquoy Lucile, Explicit and Implicit Training of Subject–Verb Agreement Processing in 3rd and 5th Grades, 10.1007/s10674-005-0331-0
  25. Nunes Terezinha, Bryant Peter, Olsson Jenny, Learning Morphological and Phonological Spelling Rules: An Intervention Study, 10.1207/s1532799xssr0703_6
  26. Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence. Implications for teachers and parents. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol 5. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. (pp. 339–367). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  27. Pajares Frank, Cheong Yuk F., Achievement goal orientations in writing:a developmental perspective, 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.008
  28. Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104–120.
  29. Paris Scott G., Paris Alison H., Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning, 10.1207/s15326985ep3602_4
  30. Pintrich Paul R, The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning, 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4
  31. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1998). Progressive Matrices Standard (PM38). Edition 1998. Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques.
  32. Sandra Dominiek, Frisson Steven, Daems Frans, Why Simple Verb Forms Can Be So Difficult to Spell: The Influence of Homophone Frequency and Distance in Dutch, 10.1006/brln.1999.2108
  33. Schünemann Nina, Spörer Nadine, Brunstein Joachim C., Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.002
  34. Schunk Dale H., Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement., 10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848
  35. Schunk Dale H., Ertmer Peggy A., Self-Regulation and Academic Learning, Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) ISBN:9780121098902 p.631-649, 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50048-2
  36. Schunk Dale H., Rice Jo Mary, Learning Goals and Children's Reading Comprehension, 10.1080/10862968909547677
  37. Schunk Dale H., Rice Jo Mary, Learning Goals and Progress Feedback during Reading Comprehension Instruction, 10.1080/10862969109547746
  38. Schunk Dale H., Zimmerman Barry J., Influencing Children's Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation of Reading and Writing Through Modeling, 10.1080/10573560600837578
  39. Sweller John, Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design, 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
  40. Totereau C., Barrouillet P., Fayol M., Overgeneralizations of number inflections in the learning of written French: The case of noun and verb, 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00764.x
  41. Usher E. L., Pajares F., Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions, 10.3102/0034654308321456
  42. van Merriënboer Jeroen J. G., Sweller John, Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions, 10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
  43. Van Reybroeck M., Hupet M., Acquisition of number agreement: effects of various processing demands, 10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.3
  44. Van Reybroeck Marie, Schelstraete Marie-Anne, Hupet Michel, Szmalec Arnaud, Switching Between Noun and Verb Agreement Rules Comes at a Cost: Cross-Sectional and Interventional Studies in a Developmental Sample, 10.2478/plc-2014-0016
  45. Zimmerman Barry J., Attaining Self-Regulation, Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) ISBN:9780121098902 p.13-39, 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7