User menu

Laboratory social environment biases mating outcome: a first quantitative synthesis in a butterfly

Bibliographic reference Nieberding, Caroline ; Holveck, Marie-Jeanne. Laboratory social environment biases mating outcome: a first quantitative synthesis in a butterfly. In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, (2017)
Permanent URL
  1. Atwell Ashley, Wagner William E., Female mate choice plasticity is affected by the interaction between male density and female age in a field cricket, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.007
  2. Bacquet P. M. B., Brattstrom O., Wang H.- L., Allen C. E., Lofstedt C., Brakefield P. M., Nieberding C. M., Selection on male sex pheromone composition contributes to butterfly reproductive isolation, 10.1098/rspb.2014.2734
  3. Bacquet Paul M. B., de Jong Maaike A., Brattström Oskar, Wang Hong-Lei, Molleman Freerk, Heuskin Stéphanie, Lognay George, Löfstedt Christer, Brakefield Paul M., Vanderpoorten Alain, Nieberding Caroline M., Differentiation in putative male sex pheromone components across and within populations of the African butterflyBicyclus anynanaas a potential driver of reproductive isolation, 10.1002/ece3.2298
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, S. W (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. In, R package version 1.1–7 edn
  5. BRAKEFIELD PAUL M., REITSMA NICO, Phenotypic plasticity, seasonal climate and the population biology of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) in Malawi, 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1991.tb00220.x
  6. Brakefield PM, Beldade P, Zwaan BJ (2009) The African butterfly Bicyclus anynana: a model for evolutionary genetics and evolutionary developmental biology. In: Behringer RR, Johnson AD, Krumlauf RE (eds) Emerging model organisms: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp 291–329
  7. Casares Pelayo, Carracedo Maria C., del Rio Beatriz, Pineiro Rafael, Garcia-Florez Lucia, Barros Ana R., DISENTANGLING THE EFFECTS OF MATING PROPENSITY AND MATING CHOICE IN DROSOPHILA , 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05145.x
  8. Costanzo K., Monteiro A., The use of chemical and visual cues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, 10.1098/rspb.2006.3729
  9. Cotton Samuel, Small Jennifer, Pomiankowski Andrew, Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.022
  10. de Jong Karen, Wacker Sebastian, Amundsen Trond, Forsgren Elisabet, Do operational sex ratio and density affect mating behaviour? An experiment on the two-spotted goby, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.08.006
  11. de Jong MA, Kesbeke FMNH, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ, Geographic variation in thermal plasticity of life history and wing pattern in Bicyclus anynana, 10.3354/cr00881
  12. Dick Jaimie T.A., Elwood Robert W., Effects of Natural Variation in Sex Ratio and Habitat Structure On Mate-Guarding Decisions in Amphipods (Crustacea), 10.1163/156853996x00567
  13. Dijkstra Peter D., Seehausen Ole, Gricar Boye L. A., Maan Martine E., Groothuis Ton G. G., Can male-male competition stabilize speciation? A test in Lake Victoria haplochromine cichlid fish, 10.1007/s00265-005-0100-1
  14. Dougherty L. R., Shuker D. M., The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis, 10.1093/beheco/aru125
  15. Drury JP, Grether GF (2014) Interspecific aggression, not interspecific mating, drives character displacement in the wing coloration of male rubyspot damselflies (Hetaerina). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences 281
  16. ELSTON D. A., MOSS R., BOULINIER T., ARROWSMITH C., LAMBIN X., Analysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks, 10.1017/s0031182001007740
  17. Emlen S., Oring L., Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems, 10.1126/science.327542
  18. Fischer K., Perlick J., Galetz T., Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better, 10.1098/rspb.2007.1455
  19. Forstmeier Wolfgang, Schielzeth Holger, Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse, 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5
  20. Geister T. L., Fischer K., Testing the beneficial acclimation hypothesis: temperature effects on mating success in a butterfly, 10.1093/beheco/arm024
  21. Grether Gregory F., Anderson Christopher N., Drury Jonathan P., Kirschel Alexander N. G., Losin Neil, Okamoto Kenichi, Peiman Kathryn S., The evolutionary consequences of interspecific aggression : Aggression between species, 10.1111/nyas.12082
  22. Griffith Simon C., Crino Ondi L., Andrew Samuel C., Nomano Fumiaki Y., Adkins-Regan Elizabeth, Alonso-Alvarez Carlos, Bailey Ida E., Bittner Stephanie S., Bolton Peri E., Boner Winnie, Boogert Neeltje, Boucaud Ingrid C. A., Briga Michael, Buchanan Katherine L., Caspers Barbara A., Cichoń Mariusz, Clayton David F., Derégnaucourt Sebastien, Forstmeier Wolfgang, Guillette Lauren M., Hartley Ian R., Healy Susan D., Hill Davina L., Holveck Marie-Jeanne, Hurley Laura L., Ihle Malika, Tobias Krause E., Mainwaring Mark C., Marasco Valeria, Mariette Mylene M., Martin-Wintle Meghan S., McCowan Luke S. C., McMahon Maeve, Monaghan Pat, Nager Ruedi G., Naguib Marc, Nord Andreas, Potvin Dominique A., Prior Nora H., Riebel Katharina, Romero-Haro Ana A., Royle Nick J., Rutkowska Joanna, Schuett Wiebke, Swaddle John P., Tobler Michael, Trompf Larissa, Varian-Ramos Claire W., Vignal Clémentine, Villain Avelyne S., Williams Tony D., Variation in Reproductive Success Across Captive Populations: Methodological Differences, Potential Biases and Opportunities, 10.1111/eth.12576
  23. Gröning Julia, Hochkirch Axel, Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species, 10.1086/590510
  24. Holveck M.-J., Riebel K., Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate, 10.1098/rspb.2009.1222
  25. Holveck Marie-Jeanne, Gauthier Anne-Laure, Nieberding Caroline M., Dense, small and male-biased cages exacerbate male–male competition and reduce female choosiness in Bicyclus anynana, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.03.025
  26. Janowitz Susann A., Fischer Klaus, Costing reproduction: effects of mating opportunity on mating success in male Bicyclus anynana butterflies, 10.1007/s00265-010-1011-3
  27. Janowitz Susann A., Fischer Klaus, Polyandry inBicyclus anynanaButterflies Results from Sexual Conflict over Mating, 10.1111/eth.12017
  29. Jirotkul Mullica, Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male–male competition in guppies, 10.1006/anbe.1999.1149
  30. Jirotkul Mullica, Population density influences male–male competition in guppies, 10.1006/anbe.1999.1248
  31. Joron Mathieu, Brakefield Paul M., Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies, 10.1038/nature01713
  32. Kamiya T., O'Dwyer K., Westerdahl H., Senior A., Nakagawa S., A quantitative review of MHC-based mating preference: the role of diversity and dissimilarity, 10.1111/mec.12934
  33. Karl Isabell, Heuskin Stéphanie, Fischer Klaus, Dissecting the mechanisms underlying old male mating advantage in a butterfly, 10.1007/s00265-013-1507-8
  34. Keagy Jason, Lettieri Liliana, Boughman Janette W., Male competition fitness landscapes predict both forward and reverse speciation, 10.1111/ele.12544
  35. Kehl Tobias, Burmeister Martin F. W. T., Donke Elisabeth, Köhn Nora A. K., Metschke Katja, Pfender David, Karl Isabell, Fischer Klaus, Pheromone Blend Does not Explain Old Male Mating Advantage in a Butterfly, 10.1111/eth.12287
  36. Kehl T, Bensch J, Böhm F, Kniepkamp BO, Leonhardt V, Schwieger S, Fischer K (2015a) Fat and sassy: factors underlying male mating success in a butterfly. Entomol Exp Appl 155:257–265
  37. Kehl Tobias, Dublon Ian A.N., Fischer Klaus, Young male mating success is associated with sperm number but not with male sex pheromone titres, 10.1186/s12983-015-0124-y
  38. Knoppien P., Pot W., Van Delden W., Effects of rearing conditions and age on the difference in mating success between alcohol dehydrogenase genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster, 10.1007/bf00121611
  39. Kokko H., Rankin D. J., Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1784
  40. Kvarnemo Charlotta, Ahnesjo Ingrid, The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10056-2
  41. Maan Martine E., Seehausen Ole, Ecology, sexual selection and speciation : Ecology, sexual selection and speciation, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01606.x
  42. Mariette M. M., Cathaud C., Chambon R., Vignal C., Juvenile social experience affects pairing success at adulthood: congruence with the loser effect?, 10.1098/rspb.2013.1514
  43. McCullough Erin L., Miller Christine W., Emlen Douglas J., Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments, 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.004
  44. Miller Christine W., Svensson Erik I., Sexual Selection in Complex Environments, 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162044
  45. Miyatake Takahisa, Haraguchi Dai, Mating Success in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) Under Different Rearing Densities, 10.1093/aesa/89.2.284
  46. Moher David, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement, 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  47. Nakagawa Shinichi, Poulin Robert, Meta-analytic insights into evolutionary ecology: an introduction and synthesis, 10.1007/s10682-012-9593-z
  48. Nieberding CM, Holveck MJ (2017) Commentary on Kehl et al (2015)'s study in Frontiers in Zoology: Experimental conditions inflate the importance of male courtship activity on mating success in a butterfly. Front Zool (in review)
  49. Nieberding Caroline M., de Vos Helene, Schneider Maria V., Lassance Jean-Marc, Estramil Natalia, Andersson Jimmy, Bång Joakim, Hedenström Erik, Löfstedt Christer, Brakefield Paul M., The Male Sex Pheromone of the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an Evolutionary Analysis, 10.1371/journal.pone.0002751
  50. Nieberding Caroline M., Fischer Klaus, Saastamoinen Marjo, Allen Cerisse E., Wallin Erika A., Hedenström Erik, Brakefield Paul M., Cracking the olfactory code of a butterfly: the scent of ageing : The scent of ageing in a butterfly, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01748.x
  51. Okamoto Kenichi W., Grether Gregory F., The evolution of species recognition in competitive and mating contexts: the relative efficacy of alternative mechanisms of character displacement, 10.1111/ele.12100
  52. Oliver J. C., Monteiro A., On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies, 10.1098/rspb.2010.2220
  53. Pfennig K. S., Facultative Mate Choice Drives Adaptive Hybridization, 10.1126/science.1146035
  54. Prudic K. L., Jeon C., Cao H., Monteiro A., Developmental Plasticity in Sexual Roles of Butterfly Species Drives Mutual Sexual Ornamentation, 10.1126/science.1197114
  55. Qvarnström Anna, Vallin Niclas, Rudh Andreas, The role of male contest competition over mates in speciation, 10.1093/czoolo/58.3.493
  56. R-Core-Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
  57. Ritchie M. G., The shape of female mating preferences, 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14628
  58. Ruploh Tim, Bischof Hans-Joachim, von Engelhardt Nikolaus, Adolescent social environment shapes sexual and aggressive behaviour of adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), 10.1007/s00265-012-1436-y
  59. Santos M (1996) Apparent directional selection of body size in Drosophila buzzatii: larval crowding and male mating success. Evolution 50:2530–2535
  60. Schaefer H. Martin, Ruxton Graeme D., Signal Diversity, Sexual Selection, and Speciation, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054158
  61. Scordato Elizabeth S. C., Symes Laurel B., Mendelson Tamra C., Safran Rebecca J., The Role of Ecology in Speciation by Sexual Selection: A Systematic Empirical Review, 10.1093/jhered/esu037
  62. Siegel R. W., Hall J. C., Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila, 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3430
  63. Stoffer Brent, Uetz George W., The effects of social experience with varying male availability on female mate preferences in a wolf spider, 10.1007/s00265-015-1904-2
  64. Swanger Elizabeth, Zuk Marlene, Cricket Responses to Sexual Signals are Influenced More by Adult than Juvenile Experiences, 10.1007/s10905-015-9504-6
  65. Tinghitella Robin M., Male and female crickets modulate their courtship behaviour depending on female experience with mate availability, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.022
  66. Tinghitella Robin M., Weigel Emily G., Head Megan, Boughman Janette W., Flexible mate choice when mates are rare and time is short, 10.1002/ece3.666
  67. Verzijden Machteld N., ten Cate Carel, Servedio Maria R., Kozak Genevieve M., Boughman Jenny W., Svensson Erik I., The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation, 10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.007
  68. Wacker Sebastian, Mobley Kenyon, Forsgren Elisabet, Myhre Lise Cats, de Jong Karen, Amundsen Trond, OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO BUT NOT DENSITY AFFECTS SEXUAL SELECTION IN A FISH : EFFECTS OF OSR AND DENSITY ON SEXUAL SELECTION, 10.1111/evo.12092
  69. WAGNER WILLIAM E., Measuring female mating preferences, 10.1006/anbe.1997.0635
  70. Wearing-Wilde Judy, Mate choice and competition in the barklouseLepinotus patruelis (Psocoptera: Trogiidae): The effect of diet quality and sex ratio, 10.1007/bf02213883
  71. West-Eberhard Mary Jane, Darwin's forgotten idea: The social essence of sexual selection, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.015
  72. Westerman Erica L., Monteiro Antónia, Odour influences whether females learn to prefer or to avoid wing patterns of male butterflies, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.002
  73. Westerman E. L., Hodgins-Davis A., Dinwiddie A., Monteiro A., Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly, 10.1073/pnas.1118378109
  75. Widemo Fredrik, Sæther Stein Are, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences, 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01531-6
  76. Zuur Alain F., Ieno Elena N., Elphick Chris S., A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems : Data exploration, 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x