User menu

The Vulnerability of Life in the Philosophy of Hans Jonas

Bibliographic reference Franzini Tibaldeo, Roberto ; et. al. The Vulnerability of Life in the Philosophy of Hans Jonas. In: Human Dignity of the Vulnerable in the Age of Rights, springer  : cham 2016
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/184298
  1. Anders, G., Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen, vol. I: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution (München, Beck, 1956).
  2. Barbaras Renaud, Life, Movement, and Desire, 10.1163/156916408x258924
  3. Battaglia, F. & Carnevale, A., “Epistemological and Moral Problems with Human Enhancement”, Humana.Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26, 2014, pp. v–xxi, available at: http://www.humanamente.eu/PDF/Complete_Issue%2026.pdf (accessed 27 Feb 2015).
  4. Becchi, P., Questioni vitali. Eutanasia e clonazione nell’attuale dibattito bioetico (Napoli, Loffredo, 2001).
  5. Becchi, P., La morte nell’età della tecnica. Lineamenti di tanatologia etica e giuridica (Genova, Compagnia dei Librai, 2002).
  6. Becchi, P., La vulnerabilità della vita. Contributi su Hans Jonas (Napoli, La scuola di Pitagora, 2008).
  7. Becchi, P., “Our Responsibility Towards Future Generations”, in: Mathis, Klaus (ed.), Efficiency, Sustainability, and Justice to Future Generations (Dordrecht, Springer, 2011), pp. 77–96.
  8. Becchi, P., Il principio dignità umana (Brescia, Morcelliana, 2013).
  9. Becchi, P. (with Franzini Tibaldeo, R.), “Né darwinismo né Intelligent Design. Un confronto tra Hans Jonas e Joseph Ratzinger”, Annuario filosofico, 29, 2014, pp. 242–275.
  10. Beecher, H.K. et al., “A Definition of Irreversible Coma. Report of the ad hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death”, Journal of the American Medical Association, 205, 6, 1968, pp. 337–340.
  11. Birnbacher, D., Bioethik zwischen Natur und Interesse (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 2006).
  12. Böhler, D., “In dubio contra projectum. Mensch und Natur im Spannungsfeld von Verstehen, Konstruieren, Verantworten”, in: Böhler, Dietrich (ed.), Ethik für die Zukunft. Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas (München, Beck, 1994), pp. 244–276.
  13. Bonaldi, C., Hans Jonas e il mito. Tra orizzonte trascendentale di senso e apertura alla trascendenza (Vercelli, Mercurio, 2007).
  14. Bongardt, M., “God in the World of Man: Hans Jonas’ Philosophy of Religion”, in: Gordon, John Stuart and Burckhart, Holger (eds.), Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics (Farnham, Ashgate, 2014), pp. 105–126.
  15. Borghese Keene, E., Hans Jonas. Mythe, temps et mémoire (Hildesheim, Olms, 2014).
  16. Bostrom, N., “A History of Tranhumanist Thought”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14, 1, 2005, pp. 1–25.
  17. Bostrom, N., “In difesa della dignità postumana”, Bioetica, 13, 4, 2005, pp. 33–46.
  18. Coeckelbergh, M., Human Being @ Risk. Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations (Dordrecht, Springer, 2013).
  19. Da Re, A., La saggezza possibile. Ragioni e limiti dell’etica (Padova, Gregoriana Libreria Editrice-Fondazione Lanza, 1994).
  20. Dewitte, J., “Clonons un être humain”, Alter, 22, 2014, pp. 211–232.
  21. Donnelley, S., “Bioethical Troubles. Animal Individuals and Human Organisms”, Hastings Center Report, 25, 7, 1995, pp. 21–29.
  22. Franco, V. (ed.), “Agnes Heller, una vita per l’autonomia e la libertà. Intervista biografico-filosofica”, Iride, 16, 1995, pp. 544–602.
  23. Franzini Tibaldeo, R., La rivoluzione ontologica di Hans Jonas. Uno studio sulla genesi e il significato di “Organismo e libertà” (Milano-Udine, Mimesis, 2009).
  24. Franzini Tibaldeo, R., “Sacrifice and Repentance as Self-Restraint. Hans Jonas’ Ethics for a Technological Epoch”, Toronto Journal of Jewish Thought, 2, 2011, available at http://tjjt.cjs.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Roberto-Franzini-Tibaldeo-Sacrifice-and-Repentence-as-Self-Restraint-Hans-Jonas-Ethics-for-a-Technological-Epoch-JJT-Vol.-2.pdf (accessed 23 Feb 2015).
  25. Franzini Tibaldeo, R., “From Dualism to the Preservation of Ambivalence. Hans Jonas’ ‘Ontological Revolution’ as the Background to his Ethics of Responsibility”, in: Larrère, Catherine and Pommier, Eric (eds.), L’éthique de la vie chez Hans Jonas (Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne, 2013), pp. 33–48.
  26. Frogneux, N., Hans Jonas ou la vie dans le monde (Bruxelles, De Boeck & Larcier, 2001).
  27. Frogneux Nathalie, Les conditions transhistoriques d'une juste liberté humaine : une lecture de Hans Jonas, Penser l’histoire (2011) ISBN:9782841622313 p.181, 10.3917/ecla.bouto.2011.01.0181
  28. Frogneux, N., “Une liberté responsable et décentrée à l’égard de la nature. Lecture anthropologique du ‘Principe responsabilité’”, L’art du comprendre, 21, 2012, pp. 165–185.
  29. Frogneux, N., “Some Paradoxes Linked to Risk Moderation”, in: Gordon, John Stuart and Burckhart, Holger (eds.), Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics (Farnham, Ashgate, 2014), pp. 73–91.
  30. Gammel, S., “Achtung und Verachtung der Natur. Hans Jonas’ Denken zwischen Transhumanismus und Biokonservativismus”, in: Hartung, G., Köchy, K., Schmidt, J.C. and Hofmeister, G. (eds.), Naturphilosophie als Grundlage der Naturethik. Zur Aktualität von Hans Jonas (Freiburg-München, Alber, 2013), pp. 239–267.
  31. Gensabella Furnari, M., Vulnerabilità e cura. Bioetica ed esperienza del limite (Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino, 2008).
  32. Greisch, J., “L’amour du monde et le principe responsabilité”, in: Vacquin, Monette (ed.), La responsabilité. La condition de notre humanité (Paris, Autrement, 1994), pp. 72–89.
  33. Habermas, J., The Future of Human Nature (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2003).
  34. Hauskeller Michael, The Ontological Ethics of Hans Jonas, Philosophy and Medicine (2015) ISBN:9789401798693 p.39-55, 10.1007/978-94-017-9870-9_3
  35. Heller, A., “L’etica della personalità, l’altro e la questione della responsabilità”, La società degli individui, 1, 2, 1998, pp. 131–148.
  36. Henry, B., “Human Enhancement and the Post-Human. The Converging and Diverging Pathways of Human, Hybrid and Artificial Anthropoids”, Humana.Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26, 2014, pp. 59–77, available at http://www.humanamente.eu/PDF/Complete_Issue%2026.pdf (accessed 27 Feb 2015).
  37. Hösle, V., Philosophie der ökologischen Krise (München, Beck, 1991).
  38. Hösle, V., “Ontology and Ethics in Hans Jonas”, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 23, 1, 2001, pp. 31–50.
  39. Humanity+, The Transhumanist Declaration, 1998–2009, available at http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration (accessed 28 Feb 2015).
  40. Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, 1739–1740, available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm (accessed 5 Jun 2015).
  41. Illies, Ch., “Das gute Leben. Die Theorie des Organischen als Zentrum der Ethik bei Hans Jonas”, Jahrbuch für Philosophie des Forschungsinstituts für Philosophie Hannover, 10, 1999, pp. 97–119.
  42. Jaspers, K., Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen (München, Piper, 1958), English translation: The Future of Mankind (Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press, 1961).
  43. Jonas, H., “Comment on von Bertalanffy’s General System Theory”, in: Bertalanffy, L. von, Hempel, C.G., Bass, R.E., Jonas, H., “General System Theory: a New Approach to Unity of Science”, Human Biology, 23, 4, 1951, pp. 302–361 (Jonas’ contribution: pp. 328–335).
  44. Jonas, H., “A Critique of Cybernetics”, Social Research, 20, 1953, pp. 172–192. Then in: id., The Phenomenon of Life. Towards a Philosophical Biology (New York, Harper & Row, 1966), pp. 108–127, with the title: ‘Cybernetics and Purpose: A Critique’.
  45. Jonas, H., “Bemerkungen zum Systembegriff und seiner Anwendung auf Lebendiges”, Studium Generale, 10, 1957, pp. 88–94.
  46. Jonas, H., “Immortality and the Modern Temper”, Harvard Theological Review, 55, 1962, pp. 1–20. Then in: id., The Phenomenon of Life. Towards a Philosophical Biology (New York, Harper & Row, 1966), pp. 262–281.
  47. Jonas, H., “Heidegger and Theology”, The Review of Metaphysics, 18, 2, 1964, pp. 207–233. Then in: id., The Phenomenon of Life. Towards a Philosophical Biology (New York, Harper & Row, 1966), pp. 235–261.
  48. Jonas, H., The Phenomenon of Life. Towards a Philosophical Biology (New York, Harper & Row, 1966).
  49. Jonas, H., “Biological Foundations of Individuality”, International Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 1968, pp. 231–251. Then in: id. Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 185–205.
  50. Jonas, H., “Contemporary Problems in Ethics from a Jewish Perspective”, Central Conference American Rabbis Journal, 15, 1968, pp. 27–39. Then in: id. Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 168–182.
  51. Jonas, H., “The Concept of God after Auschwitz”, in: Friedlander, Albert H. (ed.), Out of the Whirlwind: A Reader of Holocaust Literature (New York, Union of American Hebrew Congregations, 1968), pp. 465–476. Then: “The Concept of God after Auschwitz. A Jewish Voice”, in: Jonas, H. Mortality and Morality. A Search for the Good after Auschwitz (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp. 131–143.
  52. Jonas, H., “Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects”, Daedalus, 98, 2, 1969, pp. 219–247. Then in: id., Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 105–131.
  53. Jonas, H., “Socio-Economic Knowledge and the Critique of Goals”, in: Heilbroner, Robert L. (ed.), Economic Means and Social Ends (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1969), pp. 67–88. Then in: Jonas, H., Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 81–104, with the title: ‘Socio-Economic Knowledge and Ignorance of Goals’.
  54. Jonas, H., Organismus und Freiheit. Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973). Then: Das Prinzip Leben. Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie (Frankfurt am Main-Leipzig, Insel, 1994 and Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1997).
  55. Jonas, H., “Against the Stream: Comments on the Definition and Redefinition of Death”, in: id., Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 132–140.
  56. Jonas, H., “Biological Engineering – A Preview”, in: id., Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 141–167.
  57. Jonas, H., “Impotence or Power of Subjectivity? A Reappraisal of the Psychophysical Problem”, in: id., On Faith, Reason, and Responsibility: Six Essays (New York-San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1978, then: Claremont, Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, 1981), pp. 31–64.
  58. Jonas, H., “The Right to Die”, Hastings Center Report, 8, 4, 1978, pp. 31–36.
  59. Jonas, H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation (Frankfurt am Main, Insel, 1979, then: Suhrkamp, 1984), English translation: The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1984).
  60. Jonas, H., “Ärztliche Kunst und menschliche Verantwortung”, Renovatio, 39, 4, 1983, pp. 229–237. Then in: id., Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung (Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1985, then: Suhrkamp, 1987), pp. 146–161.
  61. Jonas, H., “Wie können wir unsere Pflicht gegen die Nachwelt und die Erde unabhängig vom Glauben begründen?” (1984), in: Böhler, Dietrich and Brune, Jens Peter (eds.), Orientierung und Verantwortung. Begegnungen und Auseinandersetzungen mit Hans Jonas (Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2004), pp. 71–84.
  62. Jonas, H., “Werkzeug, Bild und Grab: Vom Transanimalischen im Menschen”, Scheidewege, 15, 1985–86, pp. 47–58, English translation: “Tool, Image, and Grave: On What Is Beyond the Animal in Man”, in: id., Mortality and Morality. A Search for the Good after Auschwitz (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp. 75–86.
  63. Jonas, H., Materie, Geist und Schöpfung. Kosmologischer Befund und kosmogonische Vermutung (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1988), English translation: “Matter, Mind, and Creation: Cosmological Evidence and Cosmogonic Speculation”, in: id., Mortality and Morality. A Search for the Good after Auschwitz (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp. 165–197.
  64. Jonas, H., “Mitleid allein begründet keine Ethik”, Die Zeit, 25 August 1989, available at http://www.zeit.de/1989/35/mitleid-allein-begruendet-keine-ethik (accessed 23 Feb 2015). Then in: id., Dem bösen Ende näher. Gespräche über das Verhältnis des Menschen zur Natur (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1993), pp. 59–78.
  65. Jonas, H., “Last und Segen der Sterblichkeit”, Scheidewege, 21, 1991, pp. 26–40, English translation: “The Burden and Blessing of Mortality”, in: id., Mortality and Morality. A Search for the Good after Auschwitz (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp. 87–98.
  66. Jonas, H., “On Suffering” (1988), Ragion pratica, 15, 2000, pp. 46–52.
  67. Jonas, H., Erinnerungen. Nach Gesprächen mit Rachel Salamander (Frankfurt am Main-Leipzig, Insel, 2003), English translation: Memoirs (Lebanon, NH, Brandeis University Press, 2008).
  68. Kampowski, S., A Greater Freedom: Biotechnology, Love, and Human Destiny (In Dialogue with Hans Jonas and Jürgen Habermas) (Cambridge, Lutterworth Press, 2013).
  69. Kass, L., Toward a More Natural Science: Biology and Human Affairs (New York, Free Press, 1985).
  70. Köchy, K., “Von der Naturphilosophie zur Naturethik. Zum Ansatz von Hans Jonas”, in: Hartung, G., Köchy, K., Schmidt, J.C. and Hofmeister, G. (eds.), Naturphilosophie als Grundlage der Naturethik. Zur Aktualität von Hans Jonas (Freiburg-München, Alber, 2013), pp. 27–54.
  71. Kuhse, H., Individuals, Humans, Persons. Questions of Life and Death (Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag, 1994).
  72. Kuhse, H. & Singer, P., Should the Baby Live? (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985).
  73. Landecker, H., “The Metabolism of Philosophy, In Three Parts”, in: Malkmus, Bernhard F. and Cooper Ian (eds.), Dialectic and Paradox: Configurations of the Third in Modernity (Bern, Lang, 2013), pp. 193–224.
  74. Landes, D.S., The Unbound Prometheus. Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969, 20032).
  75. Larrère, C., “Vulnérabilité et responsabilité: un autre Jonas?”, Alter, 22, 2014, pp. 181–193.
  76. Lawee Eric, Hans Jonas and Classical Jewish Sources: New Dimensions, 10.1163/1477285x-12341261
  77. Leopold, A., Sand County Almanac: with Essays on Conservation (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1949, 2001).
  78. Lories, D. & Depré, O., Vie et liberté. Phénoménologie, nature et éthique chez Hans Jonas (Paris, Vrin, 2003).
  79. Michelini, F., “Teleologie und Dynamik des Mangels bei Hans Jonas”, in: Hartung, G., Köchy, K., Schmidt, J.C. and Hofmeister, G. (eds.), Naturphilosophie als Grundlage der Naturethik. Zur Aktualität von Hans Jonas (Freiburg-München, Alber, 2013), pp. 55–74.
  80. Morris, T., Hans Jonas’s Ethic of Responsibility: From Ontology to Ecology (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press, 2013).
  81. Naess Arne, The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗, 10.1080/00201747308601682
  82. Oliveira, J., Compreender Hans Jonas (Petrópolis, Vozes, 2014).
  83. Passmore, J., Man’s Responsibility for Nature. Ecological Problems and Western Traditions (London, Duckworth, 1974).
  84. Pfordten, D. von der, Ökologische Ethik. Zur Rechtfertigung menschlichen Verhaltens gegenüber der Natur (Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1996).
  85. Pommier Éric, Hans Jonas et le Principe Responsabilité, ISBN:9782130591443, 10.3917/puf.pommi.2012.01
  86. Pommier, E., “La responsabilité de la vie: l’autonomie dans la vulnérabilité”, Alter, 22, 2014, pp. 163–179.
  87. Pulcini, E., Care of the World. Fear, Responsibility and Justice in the Global Age (Dordrecht, Springer, 2013).
  88. Rachels, J., The End of Life. Euthanasia and Morality (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986).
  89. Rea, C., “Retrait de Dieu et question du mal. Une lecture éthique du mythe de Hans Jonas”, Revue philosophique de Louvain, 100, 3, 2002, pp. 527–548.
  90. Ricoeur, P., “La responsabilité et la fragilité de la vie. Ethique et philosophie de la biologie chez Hans Jonas”, Le messager européen, 5, 1991, pp. 203–218. Then in: id., Lectures 2. La contrée des philosophes (Paris, Seuil, 1992), pp. 304–319.
  91. Ricoeur, P., “Le concept de responsabilité. Essai d’analyse sémantique”, Esprit, November 1994, pp. 28–48.
  92. Ricot, J., “Vulnérabilité du monde, vulnérabilité de Dieu selon Hans Jonas”, Sens, 50, 1998, pp. 163–178.
  93. Russo, N., La biologia filosofica di Hans Jonas (Napoli, Guida, 2004).
  94. Sandmeyer, B., An Existential Interpretation of Aldo Leopold’s Concept of Land, 2010, available at https://www.academia.edu/1666398/An_Existential_Interpretation_of_Aldo_Leopold_s_Concept_of_Land (accessed 15 Feb 2015).
  95. Schmidt, H., “Über Hans Jonas”, in: Seidel, Ralf and Seidel, Roman, Hans Jonas. Zeugen städtischer Vergangenheit (Mönchengladbach, Gladbacher Bank, 1997), pp. 64–65.
  96. Schütze, Ch., “The Political and Intellectual Influence of Hans Jonas”, Hastings Center Report, 25, 7, 1995, pp. 40–43.
  97. Simon, R., “Le fondement ontologique de la responsabilité et de l’éthique du future”, in: Müller, Denis and Simon, René (eds.), Nature et descendance. Hans Jonas et le principe “Responsabilité” (Genève, Labor et Fides, 1993), pp. 101–107.
  98. Singer, P., Practical Ethics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980, 20113).
  99. Sober, E., “Why Methodological Naturalism?”, in: Auletta, Gennaro, Leclerc, Marc and Martínez, Rafael A. (eds.), Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories. A Critical Appraisal 150 Years After “The Origin of Species” (Roma, Gregorian and Biblical Press, 2011), pp. 359–378.
  100. Spinelli, E., “‘Dalla parte di Eraclito…’. Hans Jonas e la questione dei ‘diritti’ degli animali”, Paradigmi, 22, 66, 2004, pp. 351–365.
  101. Spinelli, E., “Hans Jonas e la responsabilità verso il mondo animale”, La rassegna mensile di Israel, 78, 1–2, 2012, pp. 31–46.
  102. Troster Lawrence, Caretaker Or Citizen: Hans Jonas, Aldo Leopold, And The Development Of Jewish Environmental Ethics, The Legacy of Hans Jonas ISBN:9789004167223 p.373-396, 10.1163/ej.9789004167223.i-578.81
  103. Vogel, L., “Hans Jonas’s Exodus: From German Existentialism to Post-Holocaust Theology”, in: Jonas, H., Mortality and Morality. A Search for the Good after Auschwitz (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1996), pp. 3–40.
  104. Vogel, L., “Is Ageing a Gift? Bioconservatism and the Ethics of Gratitude”, in: Gordon, John Stuart and Burckhart, Holger (eds.), Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics (Farnham, Ashgate, 2014), pp. 55–71.
  105. Weisskopf, W.A., “Moral Responsibility for the Preservation of Humankind” (1983), in: Gordon, John Stuart and Burckhart, Holger (eds.), Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics (Farnham, Ashgate, 2014), pp. 23–40.
  106. Wiese, Ch., The Life and Thought of Hans Jonas: Jewish Dimensions (Lebanon, NH, University of New England Press, 2007).
  107. Wiese Christian, “God’S Adventure With The World” And “Sanctity Of Life”: Theological Speculations And Ethical Reflections In Jonas’s Philosophy After Auschwitz, The Legacy of Hans Jonas ISBN:9789004167223 p.419-460, 10.1163/ej.9789004167223.i-578.90
  108. Wolin, R., Heidegger’s Children. Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith, Hans Jonas, and Herbert Marcuse (Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2001).
  109. Wolters, G., Ambivalenz und Konflikt. Katholische Kirche und Evolutionstheorie (Konstanz, Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 2010).
  110. Yaffe Martin D., Reason And Feeling In Hans Jonas’s Existential Biology, Arne Naess’s Deep Ecology, And Spinoza’s Ethics, The Legacy of Hans Jonas ISBN:9789004167223 p.345-372, 10.1163/ej.9789004167223.i-578.74