User menu

School accountability: can we reward schools and avoid pupil selection?

Bibliographic reference Ooghe, Erwin ; Schokkaert, Erik. School accountability: can we reward schools and avoid pupil selection?. In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 46, no.2, p. 359-387 (2015)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/173097
  1. Arcidiacono Peter, Koedel Cory, Race and College Success: Evidence from Missouri, 10.1257/app.6.3.20
  2. Barlevy Gadi, Neal Derek, Pay for Percentile, 10.1257/aer.102.5.1805
  3. Burgess S, Propper C, Slater H, Wilson D (2005) Who wins and who loses from school accountability? The distribution of educational gain in English secondary schools. CMPO, Bristol
  4. Burgess Simon, Propper Carol, Wilson Deborah, THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL CHOICE IN ENGLAND : Implications from the economic evidence, 10.1080/01442870701309064
  5. Cawley John, Heckman James, Vytlacil Edward, On Policies to Reward the Value Added by Educators, 10.1162/003465399558436
  6. Chiang Hanley, How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.06.002
  7. Epple Dennis, Romano Richard, EDUCATIONAL VOUCHERS AND CREAM SKIMMING* : educational vouchers and cream skimming, 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00516.x
  8. Figlio David N., Rouse Cecilia Elena, Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.005
  9. Figlio David N., Winicki Joshua, Food for thought: the effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.007
  10. Fleurbaey Marc, Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare, ISBN:9780199215911, 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215911.001.0001
  11. Hanushek E (2006) School resources, chapter 14. In: Hanushek E, Welch F (eds) Handbook of the economics of education. Elsevier, Amsterdam
  12. Hanushek E, Raymond M (2003) Lessons about the design of state accountability systems. In: Peterson P, West M (eds) No child left behind? The politics and practice of accountability. Brookings, Washington
  13. Hanushek Eric A., Raymond Margaret E., The Effect of School Accountability Systems on the Level and Distribution of Student Achievement, 10.1162/154247604323068096
  14. Hanushek Eric A., Raymond Margaret E., Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?, 10.1002/pam.20091
  15. Jacob Brian A., Accountability, incentives and behavior: the impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004
  16. Kane Thomas J, Staiger Douglas O, The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures, 10.1257/089533002320950993
  17. Ladd Helen F, Walsh Randall P, Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: getting the incentives right, 10.1016/s0272-7757(00)00039-x
  18. Lefranc Arnaud, Pistolesi Nicolas, Trannoy Alain, Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.008
  19. Meyer Robert H., Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer, 10.1016/s0272-7757(96)00081-7
  20. Mundlak Yair, On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data, 10.2307/1913646
  21. Neal D (2008) Designing incentive systems for schools. In: Springer M (ed) Performance incentives: their growing impact on American K-12 education. Brookings, Washington
  22. Reback Randall, Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.003
  23. Schokkaert Erik, Dhaene Geert, Van De Voorde Carine, Risk adjustment and the trade-off between efficiency and risk selection: an application of the theory of fair compensation, 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199808)7:5<465::aid-hec365>3.0.co;2-9
  24. Schokkaert Erik, Van de Voorde Carine, Risk selection and the specification of the conventional risk adjustment formula, 10.1016/s0167-6296(03)00040-7
  25. Schokkaert Erik, Van de Voorde Carine, Direct versus indirect standardization in risk adjustment, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.012
  26. Semykina Anastasia, Wooldridge Jeffrey M., Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.039
  27. Taylor Jim, Nguyen Anh Ngoc, An Analysis of the Value Added by Secondary Schools in England: Is the Value Added Indicator of Any Value?*, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00159.x
  28. Verbeek Marno, Nijman Theo, Testing for Selectivity Bias in Panel Data Models, 10.2307/2527133
  29. West Martin R., Peterson Paul E., The Efficacy of Choice Threats Within School Accountability Systems: Results from Legislatively Induced Experiments, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01075.x
  30. Wooldridge Jeffrey M., Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions, 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01645-g
  31. Wossmann Ludger, Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions and Student Performance: the International Evidence, 10.1111/1468-0084.00045