User menu

Differential foraging in presence of predator and conspecific odors in bank voles: A field enclosure study

Bibliographic reference Verplancke, Géraldine ; Le Boulengé, Éric ; Diederich, Claire. Differential foraging in presence of predator and conspecific odors in bank voles: A field enclosure study. In: Ecological Research, Vol. 25, no. 5, p. 973-981 (2010)
Permanent URL
  1. Andrzejewski Roman, The home-range concept in rodents revised, 10.1007/bf03192481
  2. Andrzejewski Roman, Babińska-Werka Joanna, Liro Anna, Owadowska Edyta, Szacki Jakub, The attractiveness of conspecific and interspecific odor for bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus, 10.4098/at.arch.97-24
  3. Andrzejewski Roman, Babińska-Werka Joanna, Liro Anna, Owadowska Edyta, Szacki Jakub, Homing and space activity in bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus, 10.4098/at.arch.00-17
  4. Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47
  5. Brown JS, Vincent TL (1992) Organization of predator–prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution 46:1269–1283
  6. Bryer PJ, Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2001) Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by slimy sculpins (Cottus cognatus): responses to alarm, disturbance, and predator cues. J Chem Ecol 27:533–546
  7. Corbet GB, Harris S (1991) The handbook of British mammals, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
  8. Engelhart A, Műllerschwarze D (1995) Responses of beaver (Castor Canadensis Kuhl) to predator chemicals. J Chem Ecol 21:1349–1364
  9. Ferkin MH (1999) Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus, Arvicolidae) over-mark and adjacent-mark the scent marks of same-sex conspecifics. Ethology 105:825–837
  10. Geuse P (1985) Spatial microhabitat of bank voles and wood mice in a forest in central Belgium. Acta Zoolog Fenn 173:61–64
  11. Herman CS, Valone TJ (2000) The effect of mammalian predator scent on the foraging behavior of Dipodomys merriami. Oikos 91:139–145
  12. Jacob J, Brown JS (2000) Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in common voles. Oikos 91:131–138
  13. Jędrzejewski W, Rychlik L, Jędrzejewska B (1993) Responses of bank voles to odors of 7 species of predators—experimental-data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68:251–257
  14. Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162
  15. Jonsson P, Koskela E, Mappes T (2000) Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments. Oecologia 122:487–492
  16. Koivisto E, Pusenius J (2003) Effects of temporal variation in the risk of predation by least weasel (Mustela nivalis) on feeding behavior of field vole (Microtus agrestis). Evol Ecol 17:477–489
  17. Koivula M, Korpimaki E (2001) Do scent marks increase predation risk of microtine rodents? Oikos 95:275–281
  18. Koivula M, Korpimaki E, Viitala J (1997) Do Tengmalm’s owls see vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light? Anim Behav 54:873–877
  19. Korpimaki E, Krebs CJ (1996) Predation and population cycles of small mammals—a reassessment of the predation hypothesis. Bioscience 46:754–764
  20. Korpimaki E, Nørrdahl K (1991) Do breeding nomadic avian predators dampen population fluctuations of small mammals. Oikos 62:195–208
  21. Koskela E, Ylönen H (1995) Suppressed breeding in the field vole (Microtus agrestis)—an adaptation to cyclically fluctuating predation risk. Behav Ecol 6:311–315
  22. Kruczek Małgorzata, Reactions of female bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus to male chemosignals, 10.4098/at.arch.94-28
  23. Kruczek Małgorzata, Pochroń Elżbieta, Chemical signals from conspecfics modify the activity of female bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus, 10.4098/at.arch.97-8
  24. Kuehl RO (2000) Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, CA, XVI+666 pp
  25. Lacey EA, Solomon NG (2003) Social biology of rodents: trends, challenges, and future directions. J Mammal 84:1135–1140
  26. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS® system for mixed models. XIII+633 pp
  27. Łopucki R (2007) Social relationships in a bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780) population: video monitoring under field conditions. Pol J Ecol 55:543–558
  28. Nolte DL, Mason JR, Epple G, Aronov E, Campbell DL (1994) Why are predator urines aversive to prey. J Chem Ecol 20:1505–1516
  29. Owadowska Edyta, The range of olfactory familiarity between individuals in a population of bank voles, 10.4098/at.arch.99-12
  30. Paillat G, Butet A (1996) Spatial dynamics of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) in a fragmented landscape. Acta Oecolog 17:553–559
  31. Parsons Glen Joseph, Bondrup-Nielsen Søren, Experimental analysis of behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) to odours of the short-tailed weasel (Mustela erminea), 10.1080/11956860.1996.11682316
  32. Pastro LA, Banks PB (2006) Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:101–107
  33. Pusenius J, Ostfeld RS (2002) Mammalian predator scent, vegetation cover and tree seedling predation by meadow voles. Ecography 25:481–487
  34. Robertson DHL, Hurst JL, Searle JB, Gunduz I, Beynon RJ (2007) Characterization and comparison of major urinary proteins from the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, and the aboriginal mouse, Mus macedonicus. J Chem Ecol 33:613–630
  35. Rosell F, Czech A (2000) Responses of foraging Eurasian beavers Castor fiber to predator odours. Wildl Biol 6:13–21
  36. Rozenfeld FM, Le Boulengé E, Rasmont R (1987) Urine marking by male bank voles (Cletrhionomys glareolus Schreber, 1780; Microtidea; Rodentia) in relation to their social rank. Can J Ecol 65:2594–2601
  37. Stoddart DM (1985) The olfactory and acoustic biology of wood mice, yellow-necked mice and bank voles. Zoolog Sympos 55:117–139
  38. Stoddart D. Michael, The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction, ISBN:9789400958715, 10.1007/978-94-009-5869-2
  39. Sullivan TP, Crump DR (1984) Influence of mustelid scent-gland compounds on suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus). J Chem Ecol 10:1809–1821
  40. Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS (2004) Influence of a granivorous diversionary food on population dynamics of montane voles (Microtus montanus), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), and western harvest mice (Reithrodontomys megalotis). Crop Protection 23:191–200
  41. Sullivan TP, Nordstrom LO, Sullivan DS (1985) Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. 1. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus). J Chem Ecol 11:903–919
  42. van Apeldoorn RC, Oostenbrink WT, Vanwinden A, Vanderzee FF (1992) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, in an agricultural landscape. Oikos 65:265–274
  43. Verdolin JL (2006) Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:457–464
  44. Viitala J, Hoffmeyer I (1985) Social organization in Clethrionomys compared with Microtus and Apodemus: social odours, chemistry and biological effects. Ann Zool Fenn 22:359–371
  45. Wolff JO (2004) Scent marking by voles in response to predation risk: a field-laboratory validation. Behav Ecol 15:286–289
  46. Ylönen H, Viitala J, Mappes T (1991) How much do avian predators influence cyclic bank vole populations—an experiment during a peak year. Ann Zool Fenn 28:1–6