User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland

Primary tabs

download
  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 248.51 K
De Schutter, Olivier [USL-B]

Large-scale investments in farmland have been criticized, chiefly, because of questions about the capacity of the countries targeted by these land deals to effectively manage these investments in order to ensure that they contribute to rural development and poverty alleviation. This article questions the idea that this is the only or even the main problem raised by such investments. If weak governance were the only problem, then appropriate regulation-and incentives to manage such investments correctly-would indeed be a solution. However the real concern behind the development of large-scale investments in farmland is that giving land away to investors, having better access to capital to 'develop', implies huge opportunity costs, as it will result in a type of farming that will have much less powerful poverty-reducing impacts, than if access to land and water were improved for the local farming communities; that it directs agriculture towards crops for export markets, increasing the vulnerability to price shocks of the target countries; and that even where titling schemes seek to protect land users from eviction, it accelerates the development of a market for land rights with potentially destructive effects on the livelihoods, both of the current land users that will face increased commercial pressure on land, and of groups depending on the commons-grazing and fishing grounds, and forests. The article maps these various levels of critiques. It concludes that we need to do more than impose a discipline on land-grabbing: we need a real alternative to this kind of investment in land. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès libre
Publication date 2011
Language Anglais
Journal information "The Journal of Peasant Studies" - Vol. 38, no. 2, p. 249-279 (2011)
Publisher Routledge (Abingdon)
issn 0306-6150
e-issn 1743-9361
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SSH/JURI/PJTD - Théorie du droit
Links
  1. African Union. 1–3 July 2009. “Declaration on Land Issues and Challenges in Africa, Assembly of the African Union, Thirteenth Ordinary Session, Doc”. 1–3 July, Assembly/AU/Decl.1(XIII)
  2. Alston J., A meta-analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D: research report 113 (2002)
  3. Altieri M. A., Enduring farms: climate change, smallholders and traditional farming communities (2008)
  4. Cornia Giovanni Andrea, Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries, 10.1016/0305-750x(85)90054-3
  5. ASSIES WILLEM, Land Tenure and Tenure Regimes in Mexico: An Overview : Land Tenure and Tenure Regimes in Mexico, 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00162.x
  6. Assies Willem, Land tenure, land law and development: some thoughts on recent debates, 10.1080/03066150903142824
  7. Atwood David A., Land registration in Africa: The impact on agricultural production, 10.1016/0305-750x(90)90016-q
  8. Banerjee, A. V. Land reforms: prospects and strategies. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 99–24.
  9. Banerjee, A. V., Gertler, P. J and Ghatak, M. Empowerment and efficiency: the economics of agrarian reform. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 98–22. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  10. Barrett, C. B. On price risk and the inverse farm size–productivity relationship. University of Wisconsin–Mad Economics Staff Paper Series, no. 369.
  11. Bates R. H, Markets and states in tropical Africa (1981)
  12. BORRAS JR SATURNINO M., FRANCO JENNIFER C., Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance, 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x
  13. Borras S. M., Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 13, 507 (2010)
  14. Borras, S. M., Kay, C, Lodhi, A. and Akram, H. Agrarian reform and rural development: historical overview and current issues. ISS/UNDP Land. Poverty and Public Action Policy paper n°1. The Hague.
  15. Bruce, J. W. Land tenure issues in project design and strategies for agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa. Paper no. 128. Madison, WI: Land Tenure Center.
  16. Bruce J.W., Land law reform: achieving development policy objectives (2008)
  17. Carter M. R., Latin American Research Review, 31, 33 (1996)
  18. Foreign land deals and human rights: case studies on agricultural and biofuel investment (2010)
  19. CESCR. 1997. General Comment No. 7 (1997) of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights on the right to adequate housing (article 11.1): forced evictions (E/1998/22, annex IV)
  20. CFS. 2009. “Committee on World Food Security, Thirty-fifth session held in Rome on 14, 15 and 17 October 2009, Agenda Item III, Reform of the Committee on World Food Security”. Final version (CFS :2009/2 Rev 1)
  21. CFS. 2010. “Committee on World Food Security, Thirty-sixth session held in Rome on 11–14 and 16 October, Final Report (CFS :2010/ FINAL REPORT)”. Available from:http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-home/cfs-36/en/[accessed on 28 October 2010]
  22. Christiaensen L., Journal of Development Economics (2010)
  23. Coase R. H., The Problem of Social Cost, 10.1086/466560
  24. Collier P, Foreign Affairs, 87, 67 (2008)
  25. Commander S., Structural adjustment and agriculture: theory & practice in Africa & Latin America (1989)
  26. Cotula L., Land grab or development opportunity? (2009)
  27. Courville M., Promised land: competing visions of agrarian reform, 3 (2006)
  28. Deininger K, Land policies for growth and poverty reduction (2003)
  29. Deininger Klaus, Jin Songqing, Tenure security and land-related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.02.001
  30. Deininger, K., Jin, S and Nagarajan, H. K. Efficiency and equity impacts of rural land market restrictions: evidence from India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 3013.
  31. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ). 2009. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Land in developing countries, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Eschborn
  32. De Schutter O. 2011. The Green Rush. The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Landusers. Harvard International Law Journal. volume 52(2) (forthcoming) (p. 276 line 1344)
  33. de Soto H, The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else (2000)
  34. El-Ghonemy M. R, Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 2 (2003)
  35. Feder Gershon, The relation between farm size and farm productivity, 10.1016/0304-3878(85)90059-8
  36. FAO-ILO-IUF. 2005. “Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development”.
  37. Field, E. and Torero, M. Do property rights increase credit access among the urban poor? Evidence from a nationwide titling program. Harvard University and Group of Development Analysis, and International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington D.C.: Working Paper
  38. The state of food insecurity in the world: economic crises – impacts and lessons learned (2009)
  39. Towards voluntary guidelines on responsible governance of tenure of land and other natural resources (2009)
  40. Global hunger declining, but still unacceptably high (2010)
  41. Freebairn Donald K., Did the Green Revolution Concentrate Incomes? A Quantitative Study of Research Reports, 10.1016/0305-750x(94)00116-g
  42. Gauster Susana, Ryan Isakson S, Eliminating market distortions, perpetuating rural inequality: an evaluation of market-assisted land reform in Guatemala, 10.1080/01436590701637375
  43. Griffin Keith, Khan Azizur Rahman, Ickowitz Amy, Poverty and the Distribution of Land, 10.1111/1471-0366.00036
  44. Hall Derek, The2008 World Development Reportand the political economy of Southeast Asian agriculture, 10.1080/03066150903142964
  45. Hoffmann, U. Assuring food security in developing countries under the challenges of climate change: key trade and development issues of a profound transformation of agriculture. Discussion Paper NO. 201. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  46. Holt-Giménez E., Food rebellions! Crisis and the hunger of justice (2009)
  47. ILO. Promotion of rural employment for poverty reduction. International Labour Conference, 97thsession.
  48. International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ICARRD) 2006. March7–10. Final Declaration, Porto Alegre.
  49. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 2009. “Land grabbing” by foreign investors in developing countries: risks and opportunities”. Available from:http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/bp013all.pdf[accessed 25 October 2010]
  50. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2008. “IFAD policy on improving access to land and tenure security, doc”. EB 2008/94/R.2. Rome
  51. Jarvis L. S, Searching for agrarian reform in Latin America, 240 (1989)
  52. Key Nigel, Runsten David, Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agroprocessing Firms and the Scale of Outgrower Production, 10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00144-2
  53. Lambin, E. F. and Meyfroidt, P. 2011. “Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity”. PNAS.
  54. Mann H., Foreign land purchases for agriculture: what impact on sustainable development? (2010)
  55. Muir R., Land markets. Promoting the private sector by improving access to land (2005)
  56. Newcombe A., Law and practice of investment treaties (2009)
  57. Musembi Celestine Nyamu, De Soto and land relations in rural Africa: breathing life into dead theories about property rights, 10.1080/01436590701637334
  58. Daniel Shepard, (Mis)investment in agriculture. The role of the international finance corporation in global land grabs (2010)
  59. Ouedraogó Robert S, Sawadogo Jean-Pierre, Stamm Volker, Thiombiano Taladia, Tenure, agricultural practices and land productivity in Burkina Faso: some recent empirical results, 10.1016/0264-8377(96)84061-0
  60. Palacio A, Legal empowerment of the poor: an action agenda for the World Bank (2006)
  61. Palmer, D., Fricska, S and Wehrmann, B. Towards improved land governance. FAO Land Tenure Working Paper 11.
  62. Penciakova, V. Market-led agrarian reform: a beneficiary perspective of Cédula da Terra. LSE Working Paper Series N° 10–100.
  63. Peterson L. E, Bilateral investment treaties and development policy-making (2004)
  64. Place Frank, Migot-Adholla S. E., The Economic Effects of Land Registration on Smallholder Farms in Kenya: Evidence from Nyeri and Kakamega Districts, 10.2307/3147118
  65. Polanyi K, The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time (1944)
  66. Reardon Thomas, Berdegué Julio A., The Rapid Rise of Supermarkets in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities for Development, 10.1111/1467-7679.00178
  67. Reardon Thomas, Barrett Christopher B., Berdegué Julio A., Swinnen Johan F.M., Agrifood Industry Transformation and Small Farmers in Developing Countries, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.023
  68. Rosset P, FoodFirst Policy Brief n°4 (1999)
  69. Schiff Maurice, Valdes Alberto, The Plundering of Agriculture in Developing Countries, ISBN:9780821321843, 10.1596/0-8213-2184-6
  70. Scott C James, Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed (1998)
  71. Songwe V., Foreign investment in agricultural production: opportunities and challenges (2009)
  72. Sornarajah M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, ISBN:9780511841439, 10.1017/cbo9780511841439
  73. Summers L. H., American Economic Review, 83, 383 (1993)
  74. The Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform. 2010. “Why we oppose the principles for responsible agricultural investment”. Land Research Action Network, FIAN International, Focus on the Global South, La Via Campesina, Social Network for Justice and Human Rights. Available from:http://www.landaction.org/spip/spip.php?article570[accessed on 27 October 2010]. Toulmin, C. and J. Quan. 2000.Evolving land rights, tenure and policy in sub-Saharan Africa.London: UK Department for International Development
  75. UNCTAD.Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from selected countries(doc. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2003/7). New York. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  76. World investment report 2009. Transnational corporations, agricultural production and development (2009)
  77. UN Habitat. International tripartite conference on urbanization challenges and poverty reduction in African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. First meeting. June8–102009, Nairobi. HSP/EC/ACP.1/4
  78. Halving hunger: it can be done. Summary version of the Report of the Task Force on Hunger (2005)
  79. UN Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing. 2007. “Basic Principles and Guidelines on Development-based Evictions and Displacement (A/HRC/4/18, annex I)”.
  80. UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food. 2009a. “Agribusiness and the right to food, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter, UN doc”. A/HRC/13/33
  81. UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food. 2009b. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter – Addendum – Large-scale land acquisitions and leases: a set of minimum principles and measures to address the human rights challenge, UN doc”. A/HRC/13/33/Add.2
  82. UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food. 2010. “Access to land and the right to food, Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutter, to the 65th session of the General Assembly, UN doc”. A/65/281
  83. Weis T, The global food economy. The battle for the future of farming (2007)
  84. Woodruff Christopher, Review of de Soto'sThe Mystery of Capital, 10.1257/jel.39.4.1215
  85. World Bank World Bank, World Development Report 1983, ISBN:9780195204322, 10.1596/978-0-1952-0432-2
  86. Doing business 2005: removing obstacles to growth (2004)
  87. World Development Report 2005: a better investment climate for everyone (2004)
  88. , World Development Report 2008 : Agriculture for Development, ISBN:9780821368077, 10.1596/978-0-8213-6807-7
  89. Rising global interest in farmland. Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? (2010)
  90. Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources (2010)
Bibliographic reference De Schutter, Olivier. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 38, no. 2, p. 249-279 (2011)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/163385