User menu

A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces

Bibliographic reference Taubert, Jessica ; Aagten-Murphy, David ; Parr, Lisa A.. A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces. In: Perception, Vol. 41, no. 4, p. 460-473 (2012)
Permanent URL
  1. Amici Federica, Aureli Filippo, Call Josep, Fission-Fusion Dynamics, Behavioral Flexibility, and Inhibitory Control in Primates, 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.020
  2. Barrett L, Primate cognition: from 'what now?' to 'what if?', 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.005
  3. Bernstein Michael J., Young Steven G., Hugenberg Kurt, The Cross-Category Effect : Mere Social Categorization Is Sufficient to Elicit an Own-Group Bias in Face Recognition, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
  4. Brainard David H., The Psychophysics Toolbox, 10.1163/156856897x00357
  5. Bruce Charles, Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect, 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90025-2
  6. Bruce V, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339 (1999)
  7. Bruce Vicki, Young Andy, Understanding face recognition, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
  8. Collishaw Stephan M, Hole Graham J, Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity, 10.1068/p2949
  9. Dahl C. D, Logothetis N. K, Hoffman K. L, Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys, 10.1098/rspb.2007.0477
  10. Dahl Christoph D., Wallraven Christian, Bülthoff Heinrich H., Logothetis Nikos K., Humans and Macaques Employ Similar Face-Processing Strategies, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.061
  11. Davidoff Jules, Donnelly Nick, Object superiority: A comparison of complete and part probes, 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90024-a
  12. De Lillo Carlo, Spinozzi Giovanna, Truppa Valentina, Naylor Donna M., A Comparative Analysis of Global and Local Processing of Hierarchical Visual Stimuli in Young Children (Homo sapiens) and Monkeys (Cebus apella)., 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.155
  13. Deruelle C, Laterality, 2, 233 (1997)
  14. Dufour Valerie, Pascalis Olivier, Petit Odile, Face processing limitation to own species in primates: A comparative study in brown capuchins, Tonkean macaques and humans, 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.006
  15. Dunbar Robin I. M., The social brain hypothesis, 10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)6:5<178::aid-evan5>;2-8
  16. Fagot J, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 429 (1997)
  17. Fagot Joël, Tomonaga Masaki, Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Use of a visual search task with compound stimuli., 10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.3
  18. Gothard Katalin M., Brooks Kelly N., Peterson Mary A., Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition, 10.1007/s10071-008-0179-7
  19. Gothard Katalin M., Erickson Cynthia A., Amaral David G., How do rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?, 10.1007/s10071-003-0179-6
  20. Hayward William G., Rhodes Gillian, Schwaninger Adrian, An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition, 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.002
  22. Hole Graham J, George Patricia A, Dunsmore Victoria, Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives, 10.1068/p2622
  23. Hopkins William D., Washburn David A., Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), 10.1007/s10071-001-0121-8
  24. McKone Elinor, Kanwisher Nancy, Duchaine Bradley C., Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?, 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002
  25. Marlowe Frank W., Hunter-gatherers and human evolution, 10.1002/evan.20046
  26. Martin-Malivel Julie, Okada Kazunori, Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Role of exposure and impact on categorical perception., 10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1145
  27. Megreya Ahmed M., Burton A. Mike, Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task, 10.3758/bf03193433
  28. Meissner Christian A., Brigham John C., Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review., 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
  29. Michel Caroline, Caldara Roberto, Rossion Bruno, Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces, 10.1080/13506280500158761
  30. Michel Caroline, Rossion Bruno, Han Jaehyun, Chung Chan-Sup, Caldara Roberto, Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
  31. Neiworth Julie J., Gleichman Amy J., Olinick Anne S., Lamp Kristen E., Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)., 10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.323
  32. Nelson C A, The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood: Current Perspectives (2003)
  33. Overman Jr. William H., Doty Robert W., Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces, 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90002-1
  34. Parr Lisa A, Heintz Matthew, The Perception of Unfamiliar Faces and Houses by Chimpanzees: Influence of Rotation Angle, 10.1068/p5455
  35. Parr Lisa A., Heintz Matthew, Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle, 10.1007/s10071-008-0137-4
  36. Parr Lisa A., Dove Tara, Hopkins William D., Why Faces May Be Special: Evidence of the Inversion Effect in Chimpanzees, 10.1162/089892998563013
  37. Parr Lisa A., Heintz Matthew, Akamagwuna Unoma, Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees, 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.006
  38. Parr Lisa A., Heintz Matthew, Pradhan Gauri, Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing., 10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.390
  39. Parr L. A., Taubert J., The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates, 10.1098/rspb.2010.2333
  40. Parr L. A., Winslow J. T., Hopkins W. D., Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific?, 10.1007/s100710050032
  41. Parr Lisa A., Winslow James T., Hopkins William D., de Waal Frans B. M., Recognizing facial cues: Individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)., 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47
  42. Pascalis Olivier, Bachevalier Jocelyne, Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study, 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00090-9
  43. Pascalis O., Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life?, 10.1126/science.1070223
  44. Pelli Denis G., The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies, 10.1163/156856897x00366
  45. Phelps Maria T., Roberts William A., Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia)., 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114
  46. Robbins Rachel, McKone Elinor, Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?, 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00020-9
  47. Rodseth Lars, Wrangham Richard W., Harrigan Alisa M., Smuts Barbara B., Dare Ron, Fox Robin, King Barbara J., Lee P. C., Foley R. A., Muller J. C., Otterbein Keith F., Strier Karen B., Turke Paul W., Wolpoff Milford H., The Human Community as a Primate Society [and Comments], 10.1086/203952
  48. Rossion Bruno, Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
  49. Schwaninger Adrian, Lobmaier Janek S., Collishaw Stephan M., Role of Featural and Configural Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (2002) ISBN:9783540001744 p.643-650, 10.1007/3-540-36181-2_64
  50. Sergent Justine, An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01895.x
  51. Sugita Y., Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces, 10.1073/pnas.0706079105
  52. Tanaka James W., Farah Martha J., Parts and wholes in face recognition, 10.1080/14640749308401045
  53. Taubert Jessica, Parr Lisa A., Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: A comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys, 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.002
  54. Taubert Jessica, Parr Lisa A., Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta), 10.1007/s10071-010-0341-x
  55. Tomonaga Masaki, How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: Evidence for an inversion effect in face perception, 10.1007/bf02382051
  56. Tomonaga Masaki, Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), 10.1007/bf02557579
  57. Tomonaga Masaki, Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties, 10.1007/s10329-006-0011-4
  58. Tsao Doris Y., Livingstone Margaret S., Mechanisms of Face Perception, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238
  59. Turati Chiara, Simion Francesca, Milani Idanna, Umiltà Carlo, Newborns' preference for faces: What is crucial?, 10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.875
  60. Vermeire Betty A, Hamilton Charles R, Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys, 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00054-2
  61. Weiss Daniel J., Kralik Jerald D., Hauser Marc D., Face processing in cotton-top tamarins ( Saguinus oedipus ), 10.1007/s100710000076
  62. Wright Anthony A., Roberts William A., Monkey and Human Face Perception: Inversion Effects for Human Faces But Not for Monkey Faces or Scenes, 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.278
  63. Yin Robert K., Looking at upside-down faces., 10.1037/h0027474
  64. Young Andrew W, Hellawell Deborah, Hay Dennis C, Configurational Information in Face Perception, 10.1068/p160747