User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Agroecological Research: Conforming—or Transforming the Dominant Agro-Food Regime?

Primary tabs

Levidow, Les Pimbert, Michel Vanloqueren, Gaëtan [UCL]

Agroecology has three practical forms—a scientific discipline, an agricultural practice, and a social movement. Their integration has provided a collective-action mode for contesting the dominant agro-food regime and creating alternatives, especially through a linkage with food sovereignty. At the same time, agroecology has been recently adopted by some actors who also promote conventional agriculture. Agroecology can play different roles—either conforming to the dominant regime, or else helping to transform it—contingent on specific empowerment strategies. Tensions between “conform versus transform” roles can be identified in European agroecological research, especially in three areas: farm-level agroecosystems development; participatory plant breeding; and short food-supply chains remunerating agroecological methods. To play a transformative role, collaborative strategies need to go beyond the linear stereotype whereby scientists “transfer” technology or farmers “apply” scientific research results. To the extent that farmer–scientist alliances co-create and exchange knowledge, such gains can transform the research system.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2014
Language Anglais
Journal information "Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (Online)" - Vol. 38, no. 10, p. 1127-1155 (2014)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Taylor & Francis Inc.
issn 2168-3565
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SST/ELI - Earth and Life Institute
Links
  1. Altieri M. A., Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture (1995)
  2. Bacon Christopher, deVuono-Powell Saneta, Frampton Mary Louise, LoPresti Tony, Pannu Camille, Introduction to Empowered Partnerships: Community-Based Participatory Action Research for Environmental Justice, 10.1089/env.2012.0019
  3. Bocci R., Agrobiodiversity conservation: Securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces (2011)
  4. CEC, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, SEC, 2010, 1161 (2010)
  5. Chable V., Organic crop breeding, 139 (2012)
  6. Chambers R., Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed and Participatory (1992)
  7. Chambers Robert, Challenging the Professions : Frontiers for rural development, ISBN:9781853391941, 10.3362/9781780441801
  8. Cuéllar-Padilla Mamen, Calle-Collado Ángel, Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.08.004
  9. Darnhofer Ika, Lindenthal Thomas, Bartel-Kratochvil Ruth, Zollitsch Werner, Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review, 10.1051/agro/2009011
  10. de Molina M. G., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 45 (2013)
  11. De Schutter O., Solutions, 2, 33 (2011)
  12. Desmarais A., La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the Power of Peasants. Halifax: Fernwood (2007)
  13. Fakih M., Community integrated pest management in indonesia: Institutionalising participation and people-centred approaches (2003)
  14. Fernandez M., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 115 (2013)
  15. Francis C. A., Jordan N., Porter P., Breland T. A., Lieblein G., Salomonsson L., Sriskandarajah N., Wiedenhoeft M., DeHaan R., Braden I., Langer V., Innovative Education in Agroecology: Experiential Learning for a Sustainable Agriculture, 10.1080/07352689.2011.554497
  16. Francis C., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 60 (2013)
  17. Galli F., Laboratorio di studi rurali Sismondi (2013)
  18. Geels Frank W., Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
  19. Geels Frank W., Schot Johan, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
  20. Gliessman S., Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems (2007)
  21. Holt-Giménez E., Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture (2006)
  22. Holt-Giménez E., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 90 (2013)
  23. Holt Giménez Eric, Shattuck Annie, Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation?, 10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
  24. Jones A., Virtuous circles: Values, systems, sustainability. London and Geneva (2012)
  25. Kloppenburg Jack, Social Theory and the De/Reconstruction of Agricultural Science: Local Knowledge for an Alternative Agriculture1, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00445.x
  26. Kremen C., Ecology and Society, 17, 44 (2012)
  27. Lachman Daniël A., A survey and review of approaches to study transitions, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013
  28. Levidow Les, Oreszczyn Sue, Challenging unsustainable development through research cooperation, 10.1080/13549839.2011.627680
  29. Maréchal G., Le courrier de l’environnement de l’INRA, 59, 33 (2010)
  30. Marsden T., Food practices in transition: Changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity, 291 (2012)
  31. Méndez E. V., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 3 (2013)
  32. Noorani T., Problems of participation. Reflections on authority, democracy, and the struggle for common life (2013)
  33. Petersen P., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 103 (2013)
  34. Pimbert M. P., Participatory research with women farmers (1991)
  35. Pimbert M. P., Institutionalising participation and people-centered processes in natural resource management (2004)
  36. Pimbert M. P., Transforming knowledge and ways of knowing for food sovereignty. Reclaiming diversity and citizenship series (2006)
  37. Pimbert M. P., Towards food sovereignty (2009)
  38. Pimbert M. P., Participatory Learning and Action, 65, 43 (2012)
  39. Pimbert M. P., Fair and sustainable food systems: from vicious cycles to virtuous circles (2012)
  40. Pimbert M. P., In prep. Sustaining local food systems, biodiversity, and livelihoods: Reflections on participatory action research in India
  41. M. P. Pimbert, Democratising agricultural research for food sovereignty in West Africa (2011)
  42. Pimbert M. P., The St Ulrich Workshop on Democratising Agricultural Research for Food Sovereignty and Peasant Agrarian Cultures. Coventry University, FIAN, BEDE, Crocevia, Cenesta, FIRAB, St Ulrich Kloster
  43. Pimbert M. P., Deliberative democracy and citizen empowerment. Participatory learning and action, 40 (2001)
  44. Pretty Jules N, Alternative Systems of Inquiry for a Sustainable Agriculture, 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1994.mp25002004.x
  45. Pretty J. N., Towards a learning paradigm: new professionalism and institutions for sustainable agriculture (1993)
  46. Rosset Peter M., Altieri Miguel A., Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture, 10.1080/08941929709381027
  47. Rosset Peter Michael, Machín Sosa Braulio, Roque Jaime Adilén María, Ávila Lozano Dana Rocío, TheCampesino-to-Campesinoagroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty, 10.1080/03066150.2010.538584
  48. Salas M., Visualising food sovereignty in the Andes: Voices and flavours of the earth (2013)
  49. Sevilla Guzmán E., Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 32 (2013)
  50. Smith Adrian, Raven Rob, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
  51. Solibam, FP7 project, Deliverable 6.2: Interim report on consumers and users in the PPB process, methods and impact in the breeding outcomes (2013)
  52. Stassart P. M., Agroecology: pathway and potential for a transition to sustainable food systems [translation of 2012 article]
  53. Stassart Pierre M., Jamar Daniel, Steak up to the horns! : The conventionalization of organic stock farming: knowledge lock-in in the agrifood chain, 10.1007/s10708-008-9176-2
  54. Syngenta, Conservation agriculture in Europe: An approach to sustainable crop production by protecting soil and water? (2006)
  55. Tichit M. and, L’agroécologie en action, 27 (2010)
  56. Tomich Thomas P., Brodt Sonja, Ferris Howard, Galt Ryan, Horwath William R., Kebreab Ermias, Leveau Johan H.J., Liptzin Daniel, Lubell Mark, Merel Pierre, Michelmore Richard, Rosenstock Todd, Scow Kate, Six Johan, Williams Neal, Yang Louie, Agroecology: A Review from a Global-Change Perspective, 10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302
  57. Uphoff N., Agroecological innovations: Increasing food production with participatory development, 251 (2001)
  58. Van der Ploeg J. D., The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization (2009)
  59. Vanloqueren Gaëtan, Baret Philippe V., How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
Bibliographic reference Levidow, Les ; Pimbert, Michel ; Vanloqueren, Gaëtan. Agroecological Research: Conforming—or Transforming the Dominant Agro-Food Regime?. In: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (Online), Vol. 38, no. 10, p. 1127-1155 (2014)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/160250