User menu

Nominees, winners, and losers

Bibliographic reference Ginsburgh, Victor ; Weyers, Sheila. Nominees, winners, and losers. In: Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 38, no. 4, p. 291-313 (2014)
Permanent URL
  1. Awards, honors and prizes (2005). Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale.
  2. Bouton, L., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2011). Good rankings are bad. Why reliable rankings can hurt consumers, CEPR Discussion Paper 8702, December.
  3. Coupé Tom, Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.004
  4. Coupe T., Ginsburgh V., Noury A., Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment, 10.1093/oep/gpp019
  5. Courty, P., & Pagliero, M. (2013). The pricing of art and the art of pricing: Pricing styles in the concert industry. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), The handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 2). Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier. forthcoming.
  6. Danziger S., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L., Extraneous factors in judicial decisions, 10.1073/pnas.1018033108
  7. de Piles, R. (1708). In J. Thuillier (Ed.), Cours de peinture par principes (p. 1989). Paris: Gallimard.
  8. ENGLISH James F., The Economy of Prestige : Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value, ISBN:9780674036536, 10.4159/9780674036536
  9. English, J. (2013). The economics of cultural awards. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), The handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 2). Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier. forthcoming.
  10. Flores, R., & Ginsburgh, V. (1996). The Queen Elisabeth musical competition, how fair is the final ranking. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (The Statistician), 45, 97–104.
  11. Frey, B. (2005). Knight fever: Towards an economics of awards. Working Paper 239, University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.
  12. Frey B. S., Giving and Receiving Awards, 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00022.x
  13. Frey Bruno S., Awards as compensation, 10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500068
  14. Ginsburgh Victor, Awards, Success and Aesthetic Quality in the Arts, 10.1257/089533003765888458
  15. Ginsburgh Victor A, van Ours Jan C, Expert Opinion and Compensation: Evidence from a Musical Competition, 10.1257/000282803321455296
  16. Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2008). On the contemporaneousness of Roger de Piles’ Balance des Peintres. In J. Amariglio, S. Cullenberg, & J. Childers (Eds.), The sublime economy. London: Routledge.
  17. Glejser Herbert, Heyndels Bruno, 10.1023/a:1007659804416
  18. Graddy Kathryn, Taste Endures! The Rankings of Roger de Piles (†1709) and Three Centuries of Art Prices, 10.1017/s0022050713000600
  19. Hodgson Robert T., An Analysis of the Concordance Among 13 U.S. Wine Competitions, 10.1017/s1931436100000638
  20. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  21. Lampsonius, D. (1572). Les effigies des peintres célèbres des Pays-Bas (p. 1956). Brussels: Desclée de Brouwer.
  22. Lee Jungmin, Outlier Aversion in Subjective Evaluation : Evidence From World Figure Skating Championships, 10.1177/1527002507299203
  23. Meehl, P. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction. Northvale, NJ/London: Jason Aronson Inc.
  24. Pokorny, M., & Sedgwick, J. (Eds.). (2005). An economic history of film. London: Routledge.
  25. Redelmeier D. A., Baxter S. D., Rainy weather and medical school admission interviews, 10.1503/cmaj.091546
  26. van Mander, K. (1604). Het schilder-boeck. Haerlem: Paschier Van Wesbusch.
  27. Vasari, G. (1568). In A. Chastel (Ed.), Les vies des meilleurs peintres, sculpteurs et architectes (p. 1981). Paris: Berger Levrault.