User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Risk Policies in the United States: Definition and Characteristics Based on a Scoping Review of the Literature

  1. Muller, Les Politiques Publiques (2003)
  2. Simon, Encyclopedia of Governance, 686 (2007)
  3. Lascoumes, Environnements et Politiques (1994)
  4. Gilardi, Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe (2008)
  5. Wiener, Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (2013)
  6. Levac Danielle, Colquhoun Heather, O'Brien Kelly K, Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  7. Armstrong R., Hall B. J., Doyle J., Waters E., 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review, 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
  8. Bronson Denise E., Davis Tamara S., Finding and Evaluating EvidenceSystematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Practice, ISBN:9780195337365, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337365.001.0001
  9. Gough David, Thomas James, Oliver Sandy, Clarifying differences between review designs and methods, 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
  10. Arksey Hilary, O'Malley Lisa, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  11. Macdonald Marilyn, Lang Ariella, Applying Risk Society Theory to findings of a scoping review on caregiver safety, 10.1111/hsc.12056
  12. Pesut Barbara, Sawatzky Richard, Stajduhar Kelli I., McLeod Barbara, Erbacker Lynnelle, Chan Eric K. H., Educating Nurses for Palliative Care : A Scoping Review, 10.1097/njh.0000000000000021
  13. Mays, Studying the Organization and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods, 188 (2001)
  14. Holmes K. John, Graham Judith A., McKone Thomas, Whipple Chris, Regulatory Models and the Environment: Practice, Pitfalls, and Prospects, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01186.x
  15. Lofstedt Ragnar E., Vogel David, The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States, 10.1111/0272-4332.213121
  16. Pate-Cornell Elisabeth, Risk and Uncertainty Analysis in Government Safety Decisions, 10.1111/0272-4332.00043
  17. Thompson Kimberly M., Variability and Uncertainty Meet Risk Management and Risk Communication, 10.1111/0272-4332.00044
  18. Marchant Gary E., The precautionary principle: an 'unprincipled' approach to biotechnology regulation, 10.1080/136698701750128088
  19. Wiener Jonathan B., Rogers Michael D., Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe, 10.1080/13669870210153684
  20. Parkin Rebecca T., Balbus John M., Variations in Concepts of "Susceptibility" in Risk Assessment, 10.1111/0272-4332.205055
  21. Silenas Rasa, Waller Stephen G., D'Amore Adanto R., Carlton Paul K., US armed forces medical operations other than war, 10.1504/ijram.2008.020414
  22. Lofstedt Ragnar E., Ikeda Saburo, Thompson Kimberly M., Risk Management across the Globe: Insights from a Comparative Look at Sweden, Japan, and the United States, 10.1111/0272-4332.202016
  23. Tran Nga L., Locke Paul A., Burke Thomas A., Chemical and Radiation Environmental Risk Management: Differences, Commonalities, and Challenges, 10.1111/0272-4332.202017
  24. Gerrard Michael B., Risks of Hazardous Waste Sites versus Asteroid and Comet Impacts: Accounting for the Discrepancies in U.S. Resource Allocation, 10.1111/0272-4332.206082
  25. Encyclopedia of Governance (2007)
  26. Bevir Mark, Encyclopedia of Governance, 10.4135/9781412952613
  27. Woll, Encyclopedia of Governance, 814 (2007)
  28. van Dorp Johan R., Merrick Jason R. W., Harrald John R., Mazzuchi Thomas A., Grabowski Martha, A Risk Management Procedure for the Washington State Ferries, 10.1111/0272-4332.211096
  29. Davidson Debra J., Risk in the redwoods: contending for normalcy in timber country, 10.1080/1366987032000089855
  30. Jacob Steve, Schiffino Nathalie, Docteur Folamour apprivoisé ? : Les politiques publiques du risque, 10.7202/017663ar
  31. Mok Shannon C., Savage Ian, Why Has Safety Improved at Rail-Highway Grade Crossings?, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00642.x
  32. Lewis Roxanne E., Krewski Daniel, Tyshenko Michael G., A review of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and its management in Canada and the USA, 10.1504/ijram.2010.035244
  33. WALKER VERN R., A functional analysis of food safety regulation in the United States, 10.1017/s1357530901000345
  34. Alario Margarita V., Freudenburg William W., High‐risk Technology, Legitimacy and Science: The U.S. Search for Energy Policy Consensus, 10.1080/13669870600899521
  35. Löfstedt Ragnar E, Regulatory Negotiation: The Case of International Paper's Hydrodam Re-licensing Procedure, 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240163
  36. Bostrom Ann, Löfstedt Ragnar E., Nanotechnology Risk Communication Past and Prologue : Nanotechnology Risk Communication Past and Prologue, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01521.x
  37. Williams Pamela R. D., Patterson Jacqueline, Briggs Daniel W., VCCEP Pilot: Progress on Evaluating Children's Risks and Data Needs, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00766.x
  38. Brown Rex V., Logic and Motivation in Risk Research: A Nuclear Waste Test Case, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00572.x
  39. Burger Joanna, Greenberg Michael, Powers Charles W, Gochfeld Michael, Reducing the Footprint of Contaminated Lands: US Department of Energy Sites as a Case Study, 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240197
  40. Drew Christina H., Nyerges Timothy L., Transparency of environmental decision making: a case study of soil cleanup inside the Hanford 100 area, 10.1080/1366987042000151197
  41. Gowda M. V. Rajeev, Easterling Doug, Voluntary Siting and Equity: The MRS Facility Experience in Native America, 10.1111/0272-4332.206084
  42. Kinney Aimee Guglielmo, Leschine Thomas M., A Procedural Evaluation of an Analytic-Deliberative Process: The Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment, 10.1111/0272-4332.t01-1-00008
  43. Solomon Barry D., High‐level radioactive waste management in the USA, 10.1080/13669870903126093
  44. Brody Samuel D., Zahran Sammy, Highfield Wesley E., Bernhardt Sarah P., Vedlitz Arnold, Policy Learning for Flood Mitigation: A Longitudinal Assessment of the Community Rating System in Florida, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01210.x
  45. Andersen Mark C., Adams Heather, Hope Bruce, Powell Mark, Risk Assessment for Invasive Species, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00478.x
  46. Deisler Paul F., A Perspective: Risk Analysis as a Tool for Reducing the Risks of Terrorism, 10.1111/0272-4332.00050
  47. Stern Jessica, Wiener Jonathan, Precaution Against Terrorism, 10.1080/13669870600715750
  48. Fooks Gary, Auditors and the Permissive Society: Market Failure, Globalisation and Financial Regulation in the US, 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240145
  49. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (1992)
  50. Renn, Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World (2008)
  51. Cichowski Rachel A., Introduction : Courts, Democracy, and Governance, 10.1177/0010414005283212
  52. Epstein, Emory Law Journal, 50, 583 (2001)
  53. Shapiro M Stone Sweet A On Law, Politics & Judicialization Oxford-New York Oxford University Press 2002
  54. Grossman Emiliano, Saurugger Sabine, Les groupes d’intérêt, ISBN:9782200259983, 10.3917/arco.gross.2012.01
  55. Yin, Design and Methods (2003)
  56. Hajer, Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (1995)
  57. Held David, De l’urgente nécessité de réformer la gouvernance globale, 10.4000/rsa.514
  58. Fiorino Daniel J., Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms, 10.1177/016224399001500204
  59. Hood, Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes (2003)
  60. Schiffino Nathalie, Jacob Steve, Risk, democracy and schizophrenia: the changing roles of citizens in risk policy-making putting GMO policy to the test, 10.1080/13669877.2011.591499
  61. Governing After Crisis : The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning, ISBN:9780511756122, 10.1017/cbo9780511756122
  62. Chevallier, L'État Post-Moderne (2008)
  63. Jasanoff Sheila, Designs on Nature : Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, ISBN:9781400837311, 10.1515/9781400837311
  64. Risk Governance of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations, ISBN:9781139198301, 10.1017/cbo9781139198301
Bibliographic reference Jacob, Steve ; Schiffino, Nathalie. Risk Policies in the United States: Definition and Characteristics Based on a Scoping Review of the Literature. In: Risk Analysis : an international journal, Vol. 35, no. 5, p. 849-858 (2015)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/159341