User menu

Advanced learners' comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks

Bibliographic reference Zufferey, Sandrine ; Mak, Willem ; Degand, Liesbeth ; Sanders, Ted. Advanced learners' comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. In: Second Language Research, p. 1-23 (2015)
Permanent URL
  1. Aarts F, Text types and corpora: Essays in honour of Udo Fries, 123 (2002)
  2. Altenberg B, Learner English on computer, 80 (1998)
  3. Blakemore Diane, Relevance and Linguistic Meaning : The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers, ISBN:9780511486456, 10.1017/cbo9780511486456
  4. Bolton Kingsley, Nelson Gerald, Hung Joseph, A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing: Research from the International Corpus of English in Hong Kong (ICE-HK), 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
  5. Britton Bruce K., Glynn Shawn M., Meyer Bonnie J., Penland M. J., Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading., 10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.51
  6. Cain Kate, Nash Hannah M., The influence of connectives on young readers' processing and comprehension of text., 10.1037/a0022824
  7. Canestrelli Anneloes R., Mak Willem M., Sanders Ted J. M., Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements, 10.1080/01690965.2012.685885
  8. Caron Jean, Micko Hans Christoph, Thüring Manfred, Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentences, 10.1016/0749-596x(88)90057-5
  9. Crewe W. J., The illogic of logical connectives, 10.1093/elt/44.4.316
  10. Degand L, La langue en contexte: Actes du colloque Représentations du sens linguistique IV, 19 (2009)
  11. Degand Liesbeth, Sanders Ted, 10.1023/a:1020932715838
  12. Degand Liesbeth, Lefèvre Nathalie, Bestgen Yves, The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension, 10.1075/dd.1.1.06deg
  13. Ducrot O, Les mots du discours [Words of discourse] (1980)
  14. Ellis Rod, Modelling Learning Difficulty and Second Language Proficiency: The Differential Contributions of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge, 10.1093/applin/aml022
  15. Ferstl Evelyn C., von Cramon D.Yves, The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study, 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00007-6
  16. Field Yvette, Yip Lee Mee Oi, A Comparison of Internal Conjunctive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English, 10.1177/003368829202300102
  17. GRANGER SYLVIANE, TYSON STEPHANIE, Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English, 10.1111/j.1467-971x.1996.tb00089.x
  18. Granger S, The international corpus of learner English: Version 2 (2009)
  19. Haberlandt Karl, Reader Expectations in Text Comprehension, Advances in Psychology (1982) ISBN:9780444865380 p.239-249, 10.1016/s0166-4115(09)60055-8
  20. Halliday M, Cohesion in English (1976)
  21. Hopp Holger, Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers, 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004
  22. Hulstijn J, AILA Review, 11, 97 (1994)
  23. Kehler A., Kertz L., Rohde H., Elman J. L., Coherence and Coreference Revisited, 10.1093/jos/ffm018
  24. Knott Alistair, Dale Robert, Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations, 10.1080/01638539409544883
  25. Koornneef Arnout W., Sanders Ted J. M., Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence of implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution, 10.1080/01690965.2012.699076
  26. Lamiroy Béatrice, Pragmatic connectives and L2 acquisition : The case of French and Dutch, 10.1075/prag.4.2.01lam
  27. Lasnik Howard, Sobin Nicholas, 10.1023/a:1006322600501
  28. Leech G, A communicative grammar of English (1994)
  29. Lemhöfer Kristin, Broersma Mirjam, Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English, 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
  30. Loewen S, Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, 94 (2009)
  31. Mak Willem M., Sanders Ted, Incremental discourse processing : How coherence relations influence the resolution of pronouns, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (2010) ISBN:9789027255334 p.167-182, 10.1075/la.150.07mak
  32. MANN WILLIAM C., THOMPSON SANDRA A., Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization, 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
  33. Marian Viorica, Blumenfeld Henrike K., Kaushanskaya Margarita, The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals, 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)
  34. Meng Michael, Bader Markus, Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength: Evidence for serial parsing, 10.1080/016909600750040580
  35. Millis K.K., Just M.A., The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension, 10.1006/jmla.1994.1007
  36. Millis Keith K., Golding Jonathan M., Barker Gregory, Causal connectives increase inference generation, 10.1080/01638539509544930
  37. Milton J, Studies in lexis: Working papers from a seminar, 215 (1993)
  38. Mouchon S, Current Psychology of Cognition, 14, 171 (1995)
  39. Müller Simone, Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse, ISBN:9789027253811, 10.1075/pbns.138
  40. Murray John D., Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity, 10.3758/bf03201114
  41. Roberts Leah, Gullberg Marianne, Indefrey Peter, ONLINE PRONOUN RESOLUTION IN L2 DISCOURSE: L1 Influence and General Learner Effects, 10.1017/s0272263108080480
  42. Sanders Ted J. M., Noordman Leo G. M., The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing, 10.1207/s15326950dp2901_3
  43. Sanders Ted J. M., Spooren Wilbert P. M., Noordman Leo G. M., Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations, 10.1080/01638539209544800
  44. SEKERINA IRINA A., STROMSWOLD KARIN, HESTVIK ARILD, How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns? This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation grants BCS-4875168 and BCS-0042561 to the second author. We thank the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science for use of their eye-tracking facilities provided by the NSF grant. We thank Margaret Sudhakar and Ned Norland for assisting us with preparation and conducting the experiments, Jennifer Venditti for providing her expertise in analysing the materials acoustically, and Gary Winkel for help with the statistical analyses. We also wish to thank the students from Irwing Elementary School (Speech coordinator Ellyn Atherton) and the children from the Yellow Brick Road Preschool (Director Grace Puleo) in Highland Park, NJ, for their help in running the study. We are also grateful to Eva Fernndez, Patricia Brooks, Julien Musolino, Jill Razdan, and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful commentary on earlier drafts of this article. , 10.1017/s0305000903005890
  45. Wilson Deirdre, Sperber Dan, Linguistic form and relevance, 10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5
  46. Traxler Matthew J., Bybee Michael D., Pickering Martin J., Influence of Connectives on Language Comprehension: Eye tracking Evidence for Incremental Interpretation, 10.1080/027249897391982
  47. van Silfhout Gerdineke, Evers-Vermeul Jacqueline, Sanders Ted J.M., Establishing coherence in schoolbook texts: How connectives and layout affect students’ text comprehension, 10.1075/dujal.3.1.01sil
  48. Wilson D, Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives, 33 (2011)
  49. Zufferey Sandrine, “Car, parce que, puisque” revisited: Three empirical studies on French causal connectives, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.018
  50. Zufferey Sandrine, Givenness, procedural meaning and connectives. The case of French puisque, 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.022