User menu

World Anti-doping Agency: a meta-organizational perspective

Bibliographic reference Malcourant, Emilie ; Vas, Alain ; Zintz, Thierry. World Anti-doping Agency: a meta-organizational perspective. In: Sport, Business and Management, Vol. 5, no.2, p. 75-95 (2015)
Permanent URL
  1. Ahrne Göran, Brunsson Nils, Organizations and meta-organizations, 10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.005
  2. Ahrne, G. and Brunsson, N. (2010), “Organization outside organizations; the significance of partial organization”,Organization, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 83-104.
  3. Boudreau, K.J. and Lakhani, K.R. (2009), “How to manage outside innovation: competitive markets or collaborative communities”,MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 69-75.
  4. Chappelet, J.L. (2002), “L’Agence mondiale antidopage: un nouveau régulateur des relations internationales sportives”,Relations Internationales, Vol. 111, pp. 381-401, available at: & cpsidt=14010851
  5. Cléret Léa, The role of anti-doping education in delivering WADA's mission, 10.1080/19406940.2011.577084
  6. Cohen Nissim, Arieli Tamar, Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling, 10.1177/0022343311405698
  8. De Noni Ivan, Ganzaroli Andrea, Orsi Luigi, The evolution of OSS governance: a dimensional comparative analysis, 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003
  9. Dimeo Paul, Hunt Thomas M., Bowers Matthew T., Saint or Sinner?: A Reconsideration of the Career of Prince Alexandre de Merode, Chair of the International Olympic Committee's Medical Commission, 1967–2002, 10.1080/09523367.2011.557912
  10. Dumez, H. (2008), “Les méta-organisations”,Le Libellio d’Aegis, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 31-36.
  11. Fjeldstad Øystein D., Snow Charles C., Miles Raymond E., Lettl Christopher, The architecture of collaboration, 10.1002/smj.1968
  12. Gadille, M. , Tremblay, D.G. and Vion, A. (2013), “La méta-organisation territorialisée, moteur d’apprentissages collectifs”,Revue Interventions économiques, Vol. 48, pp. 1-18.
  13. Geeraert, A. (2013), “Compliance system: WADA”, in Alm, J. (Ed.),Action for Good Governance in International Sport Organizations. Final Report, pp. 56-66.
  14. Gulati Ranjay, Singh Harbir, The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances, 10.2307/2393616
  15. Gulati Ranjay, Lawrence Paul R., Puranam Phanish, Adaptation in vertical relationships: beyond incentive conflict, 10.1002/smj.458
  16. Gulati Ranjay, Puranam Phanish, Tushman Michael, Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts, 10.1002/smj.1975
  17. Hanstad Dag Vidar, Smith Andy, Waddington Ivan, The Establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency : A Study of the Management of Organizational Change and Unplanned Outcomes, 10.1177/1012690208100552
  18. Henne Kathryn, WADA, the Promises of Law and the Landscapes of Antidoping Regulation, 10.1111/j.1555-2934.2010.01116.x
  19. Houlihan Barrie, Civil Rights, Doping Control and the World Anti-doping Code, 10.1080/1743042000291712
  20. Jarzabkowski Paula, Lê Jane K, Van de Ven Andrew H, Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve, 10.1177/1476127013481016
  21. Kamber Matthias, Development of the role of National Anti-Doping Organisations in the fight against doping: From past to future, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.026
  22. Kerwer, D. (2013), “International organizations as meta-organizations: the case of the European Union”,Journal of International Organizations Studies, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 40-53.
  23. König Andreas, Schulte Martin, Enders Albrecht, Inertia in response to non-paradigmatic change: The case of meta-organizations, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.006
  24. Spiggle Susan, Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research, 10.1086/209413
  25. Sturges Judith E., Hanrahan Kathleen J., Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note, 10.1177/1468794104041110
  26. Tushman Michael, Lakhani Karim R., Lifshitz-Assaf Hila, Open Innovation and Organization Design, 10.7146/jod.6336
  27. van de Bunt Gerhard G., Groenewegen Peter, An Actor-Oriented Dynamic Network Approach : The Case of Interorganizational Network Evolution, 10.1177/1094428107300203
  28. Vifell, A.C. and Thedvall, R. (2012), “Organizing for social sustainability: governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations”,Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 50-58.
  29. Wagner Ulrik, The World Anti-Doping Agency: constructing a hybrid organisation in permanent stress (dis)order?, 10.1080/19406940902950721
  30. Wagner Ulrik, Towards the Construction of the World Anti-Doping Agency: Analyzing the Approaches of FIFA and the IAAF to Doping in Sport, 10.1080/16184742.2011.624107
  31. Wagner Ulrik, Pedersen Kasper Møller, The IOC and the doping issue—An institutional discursive approach to organizational identity construction, 10.1016/j.smr.2013.05.001
  32. Xhauflair, V. (2013), “Apprentissage collectif et réflexivité systémique: le rôle des acteurs tiers dans la structuration des méta-organisations”,Revue Interventions économiques, Vol. 48, pp. 1-18.
  33. Borgatti S, The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology, 10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00087-4
  34. Noy Chaim, Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research, 10.1080/13645570701401305