User menu

Advance human–machine interface automatic evaluation

Bibliographic reference Gonzalez Calleros, Juan Manuel ; Guerrero Garcia, Josefina ; Vanderdonckt, Jean. Advance human–machine interface automatic evaluation. In: Universal Access in the Information Society : international journal, Vol. 12, no.4, p. 387-401 (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/150591
  1. Beirekdar Abdo, Vanderdonckt Jean, Noirhomme-Fraiture Monique, A Framework and a Language for Usability Automatic Evaluation of Web Sites by Static Analysis of HTML Source Code, Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces III (2002) ISBN:9789401039154 p.337-348, 10.1007/978-94-010-0421-3_29
  2. Beirekdar, A., Keita, M., Noirhomme, M., Randolet, F., Vanderdonckt, J., Mariage, C.: Flexible reporting for automated usability and accessibility evaluation of web sites. In: Proceedings of 10th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction INTERACT’2005 (Rome, 12–16 September 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3585, pp. 281–294. Springer, Berlin (2005)
  3. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Bouillon, L., Florins, M., Limbourg, Q., Marucci, L., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Souchon, N., Thevenin, D., Vanderdonckt, J.: The CAMELEON reference framework, deliverable 1.1, version V1.1, CAMELEON project (2002) Campbell, E., Maintaining accessible Websites with Microsoft Word and XML. In: Proceedings of XML Europe 2003 (London, 5–8 May 2003), XML Workshop Ltd., London (2002)
  4. Choong, Y., Plocher, T., Rau, P.: Cross-cultural Web design. Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design, pp. 284–300. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)
  5. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Recommendation, 5 May (1999). Accessible at http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/
  6. Cooper, M.: Evaluating accessibility and usability of web sites. In: Puerta, A., Vanderdonckt, J. (eds.) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’99 (Louvain-la-Neuve, 21–23 October 1999), pp. 33–42. Kluwer Academics Publisher, Dordrecht (1999)
  7. Cooper, M., Limbourg, Q., Mariage, C., Vanderdonckt, J.: Integrating universal design into a global approach for managing very large web sites. In: Kobsa, A., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All UI4ALL’99 (Dagstuhl, 28 November-1 December 1999), GMD Report 74, GMD—Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik GmbH, Sankt Augustin, pp. 131–150 (1999). Accessible at http://ui4all.ics.forth.gr/UI4ALL-99/Cooper.pdf
  8. Farenc, C., Liberati, V., Barthet, M.-F.: Automatic ergonomic evaluation: what are the limits? In: Vanderdonckt, J. (ed.) Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’96 (Namur, 5–7 June 1996), pp. 159–170. Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur (1996)
  9. Gallagher K.B., Lyle J.R., Using program slicing in software maintenance, 10.1109/32.83912
  10. Guerrero-García, J., González-Calleros, J.M., Vanderdonckt, J., Muñoz-Arteaga, J.: A theoretical survey of user interface description languages: preliminary results. In: Chavez, E., Furtado, E., Moran, A. (eds.) Proceedings of Joint 4th Latin American Conference on Human–Computer Interaction-7th Latin American Web Congress LA-Web/CLIHC’2009 (Merida, November 9–11, 2009), pp. 36–43. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2009)
  11. Grammenos D, Akoumianakis D, Stephanidis C, Integrated support for working with guidelines: the Sherlock guideline management system, 10.1016/s0953-5438(99)00015-6
  12. IBM: IBM’s web design guidelines, December (1999). Accessible at http://www.ibm.com/ibm/hci/guidelines/web/web_design.html
  13. ISO: ISO 9241-10:1996. International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved 22 July (2011)
  14. Ivory, M.Y., Hearst, M.A.: State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 33, No. 4, December 2001, pp. 470–516 (2001)
  15. Ivory, M.Y., Mankoff, J., Le, A.: Using Automated Tools to Improve Web Site Usage by Users with Diverse Abilities, IT&Society, Special Issue on Web Navigation Skills, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 195–236 (2003). Accessible at http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i03/v01i03a11.pdf
  16. Jacobs, I., Brewer, J.: Accessibility Features of CSS, W3C Note 4, W3C, August 1999. Accessible at http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS-access
  17. Jiang, J., Murphy, E.D., Bailin, S.C., Truszkowski, W.F.: Automating a human factors evaluation of graphical user interfaces for NASA applications: an update on CHIMES. In: SpaceOps’92: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ground Data Systems for Space Mission Operations, Pasadena, CA. Jet Propulsion Laboratory (1992)
  18. Kaur, K.: Designing virtual environments for usability, Ph. D. Thesis, City University, London (1998)
  19. Kolski Christophe, Millot Patrick, A rule-based approach to the ergonomic “static” evaluation of man-machine graphic interface in industrial processes, 10.1016/s0020-7373(05)80182-8
  20. Lecharlier, B.: Abstract interpretation and application to interactive system verification. In: Bodart, F., Vanderdonckt, J. (eds.) Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS’96 (Namur, 5–7 June 1996), pp. 46–72. Springer, Vienna (1996)
  21. Lecerof, A., Paternò, F.: Automatic support for usability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24(10), 863–888 (1998)
  22. Lee, A., Hanson, V.: Enhancing web accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Multimedia MULTIMEDIA’2003 (Berkeley, 2–8 November 2003), pp. 456–457. ACM Press, New York (2003)
  23. Leporini, B., Paternò, F., Scorcia, A.: Flexible Tool Support for Accessibility Evaluation, Interacting with Computers, vol. 18, no 5, pp. 869–890. Elsevier, New York (2006)
  24. Limbourg, Q., Vanderdonckt, J., Michotte, B., Bouillon, L., Lopez, V.: UsiXML: a language supporting multi-path development of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of 9th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction jointly with 11th International Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems EHCIDSVIS’2004 (Hamburg, July 11–13, 2004). Springer, Berlin (2005)
  25. Löwgren, J., Nordqvist, T.: Knowledge-based evaluation as design support for graphical user interfaces. InCHI’92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 181–188. ACM, New York, NY, USA. Mollwitz, V. AFMS Handbook for Users. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR). June 2006
  26. Lüdtke, A., Weber, L., Osterloh, J.P., Wortelen, B.: Modeling pilot and driver behavior for human error simulation. HCI 11, 403–412 (2009)
  27. McCathieNevile, C., Koivunen, M.-R.: Accessibility Features of SVG, W3C Note 7, W3C, August 2000. Accessible at http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG-access/
  28. Ressler, S., Wang, Q.: Making VRML accessible for people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Assistive Technologies ASSETS’98 (Marina del Rey, 15–17 April 1998), pp. 144–148. ACM Press, New York (1998). Accessible at http://ovrt.nist.gov/projects/VRMLaccess/assets98/vrmlsigc.htm
  29. Ritsch, H., Sneed, H.M.: Reverse engineering programs via dynamic analysis. In: Proceedings of Working Conference on Reverse Engineering WCRE’93 (Baltimore, 21–23 May 1993), pp. 192–201. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1993)
  30. Rukshan, A., Baravalle, A.: Automated Usability Testing: Analysing Asia Web Sites. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.1849 (2012)
  31. Singer, G.: Methods for Validating Cockpit Design The best tool for the task, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautics of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, March, (2002)
  32. Smith, S.L., Mosier, J.N.: Design guidelines for user-system interface software. Technical Report NTIS No. AD A 154 907 (1984)
  33. Van Sickle, L., Zheng, Y., Ballantyne, M.: Recovering user interface specifications for porting transaction processing applications. EDS Research, Austin Laboratory, 1601 Rio Grande, Suite 500, Austin TX 78701 (1993)
  34. Vanderdonckt J., Development milestones towards a tool for working with guidelines, 10.1016/s0953-5438(99)00019-3
  35. Vanderdonckt, J., Beirekdar, A.: Automated web evaluation by guideline review. J. Web Eng. 4(2), 102–117 (2005)
  36. W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, December 2008. Accessible at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/
  37. Wills, L.: Automated Program Recognition: A Feasibility Demonstration. Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., (North-Holland) (1990)