User menu

Household behavior and individual autonomy: an extended Lindahl mechanism

Bibliographic reference d'Aspremont-Lynden, Claude ; Dos Santos Ferreira, Rodolphe. Household behavior and individual autonomy: an extended Lindahl mechanism. In: Economic Theory, Vol. 55, no.3, p. 643-664 (2014)
Permanent URL
  1. Ashraf Nava, Spousal Control and Intra-Household Decision Making: An Experimental Study in the Philippines, 10.1257/aer.99.4.1245
  2. d'Aspremont Claude, Dos Santos Ferreira Rodolphe, Price–quantity competition with varying toughness, 10.1016/j.geb.2008.03.001
  3. Browning M., Chiappori P. A., Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests, 10.2307/2999616
  4. Browning Martin, Chiappori Pierre-André, Lechene Valérie, Distributional Effects in Household Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling* : Distributional effects in household models, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02311.x
  5. Chen Zhiqi, Woolley Frances, A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making, 10.1111/1468-0297.00657
  6. Cherchye Laurens, De Rock Bram, Vermeulen Frederic, The Collective Model of Household Consumption: A Nonparametric Characterization, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00757.x
  7. Cherchye Laurens, Demuynck Thomas, Rock Bram De, Revealed Preference Analysis of Non-Cooperative Household Consumption* : NON-COOPERATIVE HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02432.x
  8. Cherchye Laurens, De Rock Bram, Platino Vincenzo, Private versus public consumption within groups: testing the nature of goods from aggregate data, 10.1007/s00199-012-0729-8
  9. Chiappori Pierre-Andre, Rational Household Labor Supply, 10.2307/1911842
  10. Chiappori Pierre-André, Collective Labor Supply and Welfare, 10.1086/261825
  11. Debreu Gerard, A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem, 10.1073/pnas.38.10.886
  12. Hurwicz L., Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points, 10.2307/2297046
  13. Lechene, V., Preston, I.: Household Nash equilibrium with voluntarily contributed public goods. Econ. Ser. WP 226, Oxford, (2005)
  14. Lechene Valérie, Preston Ian, Noncooperative household demand, 10.1016/j.jet.2010.10.013
  15. Lindahl, E.: Just taxation—a positive solution. In: Musgrave, R.A., Peacock, A.T. (eds.) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, pp. 168–176. Macmillan, London (1958). English translation of: Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung, I.4, 85–98, Lund (1919)
  16. Lundberg Shelly, Pollak Robert A., Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market, 10.1086/261912
  17. Manser Marilyn, Brown Murray, Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis, 10.2307/2526238
  18. McElroy Marjorie B., Horney Mary Jean, Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand, 10.2307/2526280
  19. Pahl Jan, Family finances, individualisation, spending patterns and access to credit, 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.041
  20. Samuelson Paul A., The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, 10.2307/1925895
  21. Schaner, S.G.: Do Opposites Detract? Intrahousehold Preference Heterogeneity and Inefficient Strategic Savings. Mimeo, Stanford (2013)
  22. Udry Christopher, Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household, 10.1086/262050
  23. Ulph David, Un modèle non coopératif de consommation des ménages, 10.7202/013465ar
  24. Vogler Carolyn, Brockmann Michaela, Wiggins Richard D., Intimate relationships and changing patterns of money management at the beginning of the twenty-first century, 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00120.x
  25. Yannelis Nicholas C., Debreu’s social equilibrium theorem with asymmetric information and a continuum of agents, 10.1007/s00199-007-0246-3
  26. Walker Mark, A Simple Incentive Compatible Scheme for Attaining Lindahl Allocations, 10.2307/1911126