User menu

The use of agrobiodiversity for plant improvement and the intellectual property paradigm: institutional fit and legal tools for mass selection, conventional and molecular plant breeding

Bibliographic reference Batur, Fulya ; Dedeurwaerdere, Tom. The use of agrobiodiversity for plant improvement and the intellectual property paradigm: institutional fit and legal tools for mass selection, conventional and molecular plant breeding. In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy, Vol. 10, no.14, p. 1-29 (2014)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/145236
  1. Anderson J, Herdt R, Scobie GM: Science and Food: the CGIAR and Its Partners. World Bank, Washington; 1988.
  2. Anvar. Semences et Droit : L’emprise d’un modèle économique dominant sur une réglementation sectorielle. Thèse Université Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris I; 2008, http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00335766/ .
  3. Barton J: Intellectual Property, Biotechnology and International Trade: Two Examples. In Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development, The World Trade Forum Studies in International Economics, Vol. 3. Edited by: Cottier T, Mavroidis P. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor; 2003:285–301.
  4. Barton JH, Berger P: Patenting agriculture. Issues in Science and Technology 2001, 17(4):43–50.
  5. Blakeney Michael, Recent developments in intellectual property and power in the private sector related to food and agriculture, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10.011
  6. BOCCI. Seed legislation and agrobiodiversity: conservation varieties Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development 2009, 103(1–2):31–49.
  7. Boyle J: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 2003, 66: 33–74.
  8. Bowler P: The Mendelian Revolution: the emergence of hereditarian concepts in modern science and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1989.
  9. Burk D: Muddy Rules for Cyberspace. Cardozo Law Review 1999, 21: 121.
  10. Burk Dan L., Critical analysis: property rules, liability rules and molecular futures. Bargaining in the shadow of the cathedral, Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models ISBN:9780511581182 p.294-308, 10.1017/cbo9780511581182.021
  11. Buttel Frederick H., Kenney Martin, Kloppenburg, Jack, From Green Revolution to Biorevolution: Some Observations on the Changing Technological Bases of Economic Transformation in the Third World, 10.1086/451508
  12. Byerlee Derek, Modern varieties, productivity, and sustainability: Recent experience and emerging challenges, 10.1016/0305-750x(95)00162-6
  13. Calabresi Guido, Melamed A. Douglas, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 10.2307/1340059
  14. Chandrasekharan Subhashini, Kumar Sapna, Valley Cory M, Rai Arti, Proprietary science, open science and the role of patent disclosure: the case of zinc-finger proteins, 10.1038/nbt0209-140
  15. Chiarolla Claudio, Intellectual Property, Agriculture and Global Food Security, ISBN:9781849807340, 10.4337/9781849807340
  16. Chi-Ham Cecilia L, Clark Kerri L, Bennett Alan B, The intellectual property landscape for gene suppression technologies in plants, 10.1038/nbt0110-32
  17. Cullet Philippe, Revision of the Trips Agreement concerning the Protection of Plant Varieties : Lessons from India concerning the Development of a Sui Generis System, 10.1111/j.1747-1796.1999.tb00081.x
  18. Correa C: Options for the implementation of farmers’ rights at the national level. Trade Related Agenda, Development and Equity Working Papers: 8. South Centre, Geneva; 2000.
  19. Drahos P, Braithwaite J: Information Feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy?. The New Press, New York; 2003.
  20. Dutfield G: Turning Plant Varieties into Intellectual Property: the UPOV Convention. In The Future Control of Food: A guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. Edited by: Tansey G, Rajotte T. Earthscan, London; 2008:27–47.
  21. Eisenberg R: Patenting Research Tools and the Law. In Intellectual property rights and research tools in molecular biology, ed. NRC, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C; 1997:10–18.
  22. Evenson RE: Economic Impacts of Agricultural Research and Extension. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Edited by: Gardner B, Rausser G. Elsevier Science, New York; 2001:573–628.
  23. Evenson Robert E., Agricultural Research and Intellectual Property Rights, International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime ISBN:9780511494529 p.188-216, 10.1017/cbo9780511494529.010
  24. Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity: the impact of international agricultural research, ISBN:9780851995496, 10.1079/9780851995496.0000
  25. Fowler C: Unnatural Selection: Technology, Politics and Plant Evolution. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Yverdon; 1994.
  26. Gardner B: Global Public Goods From the CGIAR: An Impact Assessment. In The CGIAR at 31: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Thematic Working Papers conducted by the World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, Washington; 2003:v-vi.
  27. Garrison Christopher, Exceptions to Patent Rights in Developing Countries, 10.7215/ip_ip_20061001
  28. Gepts P: Crop Domestication as a long-term selection experiment, in Janick, J. Plant Breeding Reviews Vol 2004, 24(2):1–44.
  29. Ghijsen H: Plant Variety Protection in a Developing and Demanding World. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 1998, No. 36: 2–5.
  30. Goeschl T, Swanson T: Endogenous Growth and Biodiversity: the social value of genetic resources to research and development. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 99–11. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, London; 1999.
  31. Groosman, Linnemann, and Wierena. Technology Development and Changing Seed Supply Systems. Research Report no. 27. Instituut vor Outwikkejings-Vraagstukken, Tilburg, the Netherlands; 1988.
  32. Helfer LR: Intellectual property rights in plant varieties: an overview with options for national Governments, FAO Legal papers online, No 31. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome; 2002.
  33. Heller M. A., Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research, 10.1126/science.280.5364.698
  34. Henkel Joachim, Maurer Stephen M, Parts, property and sharing, 10.1038/nbt1209-1095
  35. Hope Janet, Biobazaar : The Open Source Revolution and Biotechnology, ISBN:9780674033603, 10.4159/9780674033603
  36. ILA, International Law Association. 2010. Committee on International Law and Biotechnology. In Final Draft Report of the Hague Conference and Draft recommendations.., [ http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1016 ]
  37. ISF, International Seed Federation. Essential Derivation: Information and Guidance to Breeders. ISF, Nyon; June 2005.
  38. Jaffee Steven, Srivastava Jitendra, THE ROLES OF THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS IN ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF SEED SYSTEMS, 10.1093/wbro/9.1.97
  39. Khush Gurdev S., TIMELINE: Green revolution: the way forward, 10.1038/35093585
  40. Kingsbury Noel, Hybrid : The History and Science of Plant Breeding, ISBN:9780226437132, 10.7208/chicago/9780226437057.001.0001
  41. Kingston William, Innovation needs patents reform, 10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00090-1
  42. Kloppenburg JR: First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology (1492–2000). 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2004.
  43. Kock M. A., Essentially biological processes: the interpretation of the exception under Article 53(b) of the European Patent Convention, 10.1093/jiplp/jpm028
  44. Kryder D, Kowalsi SP, Krattiger AF: The Intellectual and Technical Property Components of pro-Vitamin A Rice (GoldenRice™): A Preliminary Freedom-To-Operate Review, ISAAA Briefs No 20. ISAAA, Ithaca, New York; 2000.
  45. Kuhn TS: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1962.
  46. Lei Z, Juneja R, Wright B: Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for biological research. Nature Biotehnology 2009, 27(1):36–40. 10.1038/nbt0109-36
  47. Lemley M: The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property. Texas Law Review 1997, 75: 1013–1023.
  48. Lipper L, Anderson CL, Dalton TJ: Seed Trade in Rural Markets: Implications for Crop Diversity and Agricultural Development, 19–21. Earthscan, London; 2009.
  49. Llewelyn Margaret, From ‘outmoded impediment’ to global player: the evolution of plant variety rights, Intellectual Property in the New Millennium ISBN:9780511735042 p.137-156, 10.1017/cbo9780511735042.012
  50. Louwaars N: Seed Policy, Legislation and Law: Widening a Narrow Focus, 1–14. The Haworth Press, New York; 2002.
  51. Louwaars, N, H Dons, G Van Overwalle, H Raven, A Arundel, D Eaton, and A Nelis. 2009. Breeding Business: The future of plant breeding in the light of developments in patent rights and plant breeders' rights. CGN Report 2009–14.
  52. Maskus Keith E., Reichman Jerome H., The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods, International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime ISBN:9780511494529 p.3-45, 10.1017/cbo9780511494529.002
  53. Merges RP: Intellectual property rights and bargaining breakdown: the case of blocking patents. Tennessee Law Review 1994, 62: 75–106.
  54. Merges Robert P., Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations, 10.2307/3480996
  55. Merges RP: Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of patent pools. In Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Edited by: Dreyfuss R, Zimmerman DL, First H. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2001:123–166.
  56. Merges Robert P., Nelson Richard R., On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 10.2307/1122920
  57. Misati Evans, Adachi Kiyoshi, The Research and Experimentation Exceptions in Patent Law : Jurisdictional Variations and WIPO Development Agenda, 10.7215/ip_pb_20100423
  58. Moose S. P., Mumm R. H., Molecular Plant Breeding as the Foundation for 21st Century Crop Improvement, 10.1104/pp.108.118232
  59. Morris M, and Lopez-Pereira. Impacts of Maize Breeding Research in Latin America, 1966–1997. CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Mexico; 1999.
  60. Murphy Denis, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology : Societal Context and the Future of Agriculture, ISBN:9780511619267, 10.1017/cbo9780511619267
  61. Narasimhan S, Robinson D: Towards a Balanced 'Sui Generis' Plant Variety Regime: Guidelines to Establish a National PVP Law and an Understanding of TRIPS-plus Aspects of Plant Rights. UNDP, United Nations Development Program, New York; 2008.
  62. Nenow L: To Patent or Not to Patent: The European Union's New Biotech Directive. Houston Journal of International Law 2001, 23: 569–607.
  63. Normile D., THE RICE GENOME: Rice: Boiled Down to Bare Essentials, 10.1126/science.296.5565.32
  64. Pelegrina WR, Salazar R: Farmers’ Communities: A Reflection on the Treaty from Small Farmers’ Perspectives. In Plant Genetic Resources and Food Security: Stakeholder Perspectives on the International Treaty of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Edited by: Frison C, Lopez F, Esquinas-Alcazar Jose T. Earthscan, London; 2011:175–182.
  65. Phillips Peter W.B., Farmers’ Privilege and Patented Seeds, Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution ISBN:9781402058219 p.49-64, 10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_3
  66. Pires De Carvalho N: The TRIPS Regime of Patent Rights. Alphen, Kluwer International; 2010.
  67. Plantum (Dutch Breeders' Association). 2009. Position on Patent and Plant Breeders’ Rights. Gouda: Plantum. https://www.plantum.nl/hoofdnavigatie/over-plantum/standpunten/ .
  68. Pray C, Naseem A: Intellectual Property Rights on Research Tools: Incentives or Barriers to Innovation? Case Studies of Rice Genomics and Plant Transformation Technologies. Ag Bio Forum 2005, 8(2–3):108–117.
  69. Pray C, Ramaswami B: A Framework for Seed Policy Analysis in Developing Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington; 1991, p.4.
  70. Rai A, Boyle J: Synthetic Biology: Caught between property rights, the public domain and the commons. PLoS Biology 2007, 5(3):389–393. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050058
  71. Reichman J. H., Legal Hybrids between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, 10.2307/1123143
  72. Reichman J: Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation. Vanderbilt Law Review 2000, 53(6):1743–1798.
  73. Reichman JH: Saving the Patent Law from itself: Informal Remarks concerning the systemic problems afflicting developed intellectual property regimes. In Perspectives on Properties of the Human Genome Project. Edited by: Scott Kief F. Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego; 2003:289–303.
  74. Salazar S, Falconi C, Komen J, Cohen J: Use of proprietary biotechnology research inputs at selected Latin American and Asian NAROs, ISNAR Briefing Paper 44. ISNAR, The Hague; 2000.
  75. Salazar Rene, Louwaars Niels P., Visser Bert, Protecting Farmers’ New Varieties: New Approaches to Rights on Collective Innovations in Plant Genetic Resources, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.019
  76. Santilli J: Agrobiodiversity and the Law: Regulating Genetic Resources, Food Security and Cultural Diversity. Earthscan, London; 2012.
  77. Sasaki Takuji, Burr Benjamin, International Rice Genome Sequencing Project: the effort to completely sequence the rice genome, 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00047-3
  78. Shapiro C: Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools and Standard Setting. In Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 1. Edited by: Jaffe A, Lerner J, Stern S. MIT Press, Cambridge; 2001.
  79. Straus J: Product Patents on Human DNA Sequences: An Obstacle for Implementing the EU Biotech Directive? In Perspectives on Properties of the Human Genome Project. Edited by: Scott Kief F. Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego; 2003:65–78.
  80. Swanson T: Global Action for Biodiversity: An International Framework for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity, 73–75. Earthscan, London; 1997.
  81. Tripp Robert, Louwaars Niels, Seed regulation: choices on the road to reform, 10.1016/s0306-9192(97)00033-x
  82. Van Den Hurk A: The Use of Genetic Resources in Plant Breeding. In Responding to the Challenges of a Changing World: The Role of New Plant varieties and High Quality Seeds in Agriculture, In Proceedings of the Second World Seed Conference, held in Rome on September 8–10, Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome; 2009:62–69.
  83. Van Overwalle G: Implementation of the Biotechnology Directive in Belgium and its After-Effects. International Review of IP and Competition Law 2006, 37(8):889–1008.
  84. Van Wijk L: Broad Biotechnology Patents Hamper Innovation. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 1995, No. 25: 15–17.
  85. Vetelainen M, Negri V, Maxted N: European Landrace Conservation: An introduction. In European Landraces: On farm conservation, management and use, eds Negri V, Maxted N, Vetelainen M, 1–22. Biodiversity technical Bulletin No. 15, Biodiversity International (IPGRI), Rome; 2009.
  86. Watal J: Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. Kluwer Law International, Alphen; 2000.
  87. Wendt J, Izquierdo J: Biotechnology and Development: A Balance between IPR Protection and Benefit-sharing. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2001, 4: 3. [ http://ejb.ucv.cl/content/vol4/issue3/issues/01/index.html ]
  88. WIPO, World Intellectual Property Rights Organization. 2011. Patent-related flexibilities in the multilateral legal framework and their legislative implementation at the national and regional levels. Part II, Document prepared by the Secretariat to the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property, 7th Session. CDIP/7/3, 18th March 2011.