User menu

Press articles and influence processes : the different effects of incriminating information and crime story information on judgments of guilt

Bibliographic reference Dumas, Rafaele ; Lepastourel, Nadia ; Testé, Benoît. Press articles and influence processes : the different effects of incriminating information and crime story information on judgments of guilt. In: Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 20, no. 7, p. 659-672 (2014)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/142411
  1. ABA. (2007).Criminal justice section standards.Retrieved from www.abanet.org/crimjust/standards/fairtrial_blk.html
  2. Arbuthnot J., American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20, 53 (2002)
  3. Baker Linda, Processing temporal relationships in simple stories: Effects of input sequence, 10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90337-7
  4. Baron Reuben M., Kenny David A., The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations., 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  5. Bell Brad E., Loftus Elizabeth F., Vivid Persuasion in the Courtroom, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_16
  6. Cissna Kenneth N., Garvin Bonnie J., Kennedy Carol W., Reliability in coding social interaction: A study of confirmation, 10.1080/08934219009367505
  7. Costantini Edmond, King Joel, The Partial Juror: Correlates and Causes of Prejudgment, 10.2307/3053221
  8. De la Haye Y., Journalisme, mode d'emploi (2005)
  9. Feigenson Neal, Park Jaihyun, Emotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review., 10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z
  10. Fulero Solomon M., Afterword: The past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research., 10.1023/a:1013885309899
  11. Gaziano Cecilie, How Credible is the Credibility Crisis?, 10.1177/107769908806500202
  12. Goldberg Julie H., Lerner Jennifer S., Tetlock Philip E., Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor, 10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<781::aid-ejsp960>3.0.co;2-3
  13. Green Melanie C., Brock Timothy C., The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives., 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
  14. Green M. C., The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion, 161 (2004)
  15. Hoiberg Bruce C., Stires Lloyd K., The Effect of Several Types of Pretrial Publicity on the Guilt Attributions of Simulated Jurors1, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb02802.x
  16. Honess Terry M., Charman E. A., Levi M., Factual and Affective/Evaluative Recall of Pretrial Publicity: Their Relative Influence on Juror Reasoning and Verdict in a Simulated Fraud Trial1, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01955.x
  17. Hope Lorraine, Memon Amina, McGeorge Peter, Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors., 10.1037/1076-898x.10.2.111
  18. Huntley Jill E., Costanzo Mark, Sexual harassment stories: Testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation., 10.1023/a:1021674811225
  19. Imrich Dorothy J., Mullin Charles, Linz Daniel, Measuring the Extent of Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Major American Newspapers: A Content Analysis, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00745.x
  20. Kovera Margaret Bull, The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms., 10.1023/a:1013829224920
  21. Kramer Geoffrey P., Kerr Norbert L., Carroll John S., Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias., 10.1007/bf01044220
  22. Lepastourel N., Testé B., L’influence médiatique sur les jugements judiciaires : rôle du style d’écriture dans la formation des jugements, 10.1016/j.psfr.2004.07.003
  23. Lepastourel Nadia, Testé Benoît, Attentes langagières et réception de l’information médiatique judiciaire, 10.4074/s0003503311001023
  24. Linz Daniel, Penrod Steven, Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial Publicity and Jury Decision Making, Handbook of Psychology and Law (1992) ISBN:9781475740400 p.3-20, 10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_1
  25. Loewenstein G., Handbook of affective science, 619 (2003)
  26. Manchec K., Droits et Cultures, 36, 65 (1998)
  27. Moran Gary, Cutler Brian L., The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity1, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00524.x
  28. Ogloff James R. P., Vidmar Neil, The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors: A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in a child sex abuse case., 10.1007/bf01499171
  29. Otto Amy L., Penrod Steven D., Dexter Hedy R., The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments., 10.1007/bf01499050
  30. Pennington Nancy, Hastie Reid, Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment., 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
  31. Pennington Nancy, Hastie Reid, Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making., 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
  32. Pennington Nancy, Hastie Reid, The story model for juror decision making, Inside the juror ISBN:9780511752896 p.192-222, 10.1017/cbo9780511752896.010
  33. Ruva Christine L., Guenther Christina C., Yarbrough Angela, Positive and Negative Pretrial Publicity : The Roles of Impression Formation, Emotion, and Predecisional Distortion, 10.1177/0093854811400823
  34. Ruva Christine L., McEvoy Cathy, Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making., 10.1037/1076-898x.14.3.226
  35. Simon R. J., Trans-Action, 64 (1966)
  36. Simon R. J., Journalism Quarterly, 48, 343 (1971)
  37. Spiecker Shelley C., Worthington Debra L., The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards., 10.1023/a:1024041201605
  38. Steblay Nancy Mehrkens, Besirevic Jasmina, Fulero Solomon M., Jimenez-Lorente Belia, The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review., 10.1023/a:1022325019080
  39. Studebaker Christina A., Penrod Steven D., Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense., 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428
  40. Studebaker C. A., Psychology and law: An empirical perspective, 254 (2005)
  41. Studebaker Christina A., Robbennolt Jennifer K., Pathak-Sharma Maithilee K., Penrod Steven D., Assessing pretrial publicity effects: Integrating content analytic results., 10.1023/a:1005536204923
  42. Tankard James W., Middleton Kent, Rimmer Tony, Compliance with American Bar Association Fair Trial-Free Press Guidelines, 10.1177/107769907905600302
  43. Tans Mary Dee, Chaffee Steven H., Pretrial Publicity and Juror Prejudice, 10.1177/107769906604300403
  44. Tuchman Gaye, Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity, 10.1086/225193
  45. Voss James, Van Dyke Julie, Narrative Structure, Information Certainty, Emotional Content, and Gender as Factors in a Pseudo Jury Decision-Making Task, 10.1207/s15326950dp3202&3_07
  46. Wilson Jeffrey R., Bornstein Brian H., Methodological considerations in pretrial publicity research: Is the medium the message?, 10.1023/a:1025743614951
  47. Wolfe Michael B. W., Pennington Nancy, Memory and judgment: Availability versus explanation-based accounts, 10.3758/bf03201252