User menu

Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks

Bibliographic reference Di Luca, Samuel ; Pesenti, Mauro ; Vallar, Giuseppe ; Girelli, Luisa. Numbers reorient visuo-spatial attention during cancellation tasks. In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 225, no.4, p. 549-57 (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/141014
  1. Axenfeld D (1894) Eine einfache Methode Hemianopsie zu constatiren. Neurologisches Centralblatt 13:437–438
  2. Bowers Dawn, Heilman Kenneth M., Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task, 10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
  3. Cappelletti Marinella, Freeman Elliot D., Cipolotti Lisa, The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.014
  4. Cattaneo Zaira, Silvanto Juha, Pascual-Leone Alvaro, Battelli Lorella, The middle range of the number line orients attention to the left side of visual space, 10.1080/02643290902937578
  5. Cattaneo Z, Fantino M, Tinti C, Silvanto J, Vecchi T (2010) Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals. Psychon Soc 72(4):885–890
  6. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
  7. Dawes S, Senior G (2001) Australian normative data and clinical utility of the Mesulam and Weintraub Cancellation Test. In: Poster presented at the 21st annual conference of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, San Francisco, California, USA
  8. Dolores de Hevia Maria, Girelli Luisa, Vallar Giuseppe, Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?, 10.1007/s00221-005-0084-0
  9. Dehaene Stanislas, Varieties of numerical abilities, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-n
  10. Doricchi Fabrizio, Guariglia Paola, Gasparini Marina, Tomaiuolo Francesco, Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage, 10.1038/nn1563
  11. Fischer M. H., Number processing induces spatial performance biases, 10.1212/wnl.57.5.822
  12. Fischer Martin H, Castel Alan D, Dodd Michael D, Pratt Jay, Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention, 10.1038/nn1066
  13. Friesen Chris Kelland, Kingstone Alan, The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze, 10.3758/bf03208827
  14. Galfano Giovanni, Pavani Francesco, Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows, 10.1007/s00221-005-2392-9
  15. Galfano Giovanni, Rusconi Elena, Umiltà Carlo, Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will, 10.3758/bf03194011
  16. GALTON FRANCIS, Visualised Numerals, 10.1038/021252a0
  17. Gevers Wim, Lammertyn Jan, Notebaert Wim, Verguts Tom, Fias Wim, Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.004
  18. Halligan P., Wilson B., Cockburn J., A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients, 10.3109/03790799009166260
  19. Hommel Bernhard, Pratt Jay, Colzato Lorenza, Godijn Richard, Symbolic Control of Visual Attention, 10.1111/1467-9280.00367
  20. Huang Ho-Chuan, Wang Tsui-Ying, Visualized representation of visual search patterns for a visuospatial attention test, 10.3758/brm.40.2.383
  21. Ifrah G (1981) Histoire universelle des chiffres. Robert Laffont, Paris
  22. Ito Yasuhiro, Hatta Takeshi, Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect, 10.3758/bf03195857
  23. Jewell George, McCourt Mark E., Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks, 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00045-7
  24. Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In: Long JB, Baddley AD (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 187–203
  25. Keus Inge Martine, Jenks Kathleen Marie, Schwarz Wolf, Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.005
  26. Maass Anne, Suitner Caterina, Favaretto Xenia, Cignacchi Marina, Groups in space: Stereotypes and the spatial agency bias, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.004
  27. Mapelli Daniela, Rusconi Elena, Umiltà Carlo, The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?, 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00042-8
  28. Mark Victor W., Monson Nancy, Two-Dimensional Cancellation Neglect a Review and Suggested Method of Analysis, 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70236-3
  29. Mesulam MM (1985) Attention, confusional states, and neglect. In: Mesulam MM (ed) Principles of behavioural neurology. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 125–168
  30. Nicholls Michael E. R., Loftus Andrea M., Gevers Wim, Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention, 10.3758/pbr.15.2.413
  31. Restle Frank, Speed of adding and comparing numbers., 10.1037/h0028573
  32. Ristic Jelena, Wright Alissa, Kingstone Alan, The number line effect reflects top-down control, 10.3758/bf03194010
  33. Ronchi Roberta, Algeri Lorella, Chiapella Laura, Spada Maria Simonetta, Vallar Giuseppe, Spatial neglect and perseveration in visuomotor exploration., 10.1037/a0029216
  34. Schneider W, Eschmann A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime reference guide. Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh
  35. Schwarz Wolf, Keus Inge M., Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses, 10.3758/bf03194909
  36. Seron Xavier, Pesenti Mauro, Noël Marie-Pascale, Deloche Gérard, Cornet Jacques-André, Images of numbers, or “when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue”, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90053-k
  37. Stoianov Ivilin, Kramer Peter, Umiltà Carlo, Zorzi Marco, Visuospatial priming of the mental number line, 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.013
  38. Vallar G, Bolognini N (2012) Unilateral spatial neglect. In: Nobre AC, Kastner S (eds) The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  39. Weintraub S, Mesulam MM (1985) Mental state assessment of young and elderly adults in behavioural neurology. In: Mesulam MM (ed) Principles of behavioural neurology. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 71–123
  40. Zebian Samar, Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers, 10.1163/1568537054068660
  41. Zorzi Marco, Priftis Konstantinos, Umiltà Carlo, Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line, 10.1038/417138a
  42. Zubin Joseph, Note on a transformation function for proportions and percentages., 10.1037/h0057566
  43. Pia Lorenzo, Folegatti Alessia, Guagliardo Marilena, Genero Rosanna, Gindri Patrizia, Are drawing perseverations part of the neglect syndrome?, 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.11.015
  44. Rossetti Y., Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Ota H., Michel C., Boisson D., Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? : Visuo-Manual Adaptation Improves Number Bisection in Unilateral Neglect, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00696.x
  45. To M.P.S., Regan B.C., Wood Dora, Mollon J.D., Vision out of the corner of the eye, 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.008