User menu

Observer Effects without Demand Characteristics: An Inductive Investigation of Video Monitoring and Performance

Bibliographic reference Becker, Thomas E. ; Marique, Géraldine. Observer Effects without Demand Characteristics: An Inductive Investigation of Video Monitoring and Performance. In: Journal of Business and Psychology, (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/140535
  1. Adair John G., The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact., 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  3. Alder G. Stoney, Ambrose Maureen L., An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.003
  4. Anderson Kristen J., Arousal and the inverted-U hypothesis: A critique of Neiss's "Reconceptualizing arousal.", 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.96
  5. Anderson Kristen Joan, Revelle William, Lynch Mary Jean, Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes-Dodson Effect, 10.1007/bf00995541
  6. Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2005). Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data: A systematic approach. Berlin: Springer.
  7. Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 33–53.
  8. Bargh John A., Chaiken Shelly, Govender Rajen, Pratto Felicia, The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect., 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893
  9. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2010). Motivation. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 268–316). New York: Wiley.
  10. Feldman Barrett Lisa, Russell James A., Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect., 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967
  11. Botan Carl, Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects, 10.1080/03637759609376396
  12. Britton Jennifer C., Taylor Stephan F., Berridge Kent C., Mikels Joseph A., Liberzon I., Differential subjective and psychophysiological responses to socially and nonsocially generated emotional stimuli., 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.150
  13. Carayon, P. (1993). Effect of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Review of the literature and conceptual model. Human Factors, 35, 385–395.
  14. CHALYKOFF JOHN, KOCHAN THOMAS A., COMPUTER-AIDED MONITORING: ITS INFLUENCE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AND TURNOVER, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00676.x
  15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  16. Davidson Rick, Henderson Ron, Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Laboratory Investigation of the Influence of Monitoring and Difficulty on Task Performance, Mood State, and Self-Reported Stress Levels, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02502.x
  17. Diamond David M., Campbell Adam M., Park Collin R., Halonen Joshua, Zoladz Phillip R., The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law, 10.1155/2007/60803
  18. Eden, D. (2003). Self-fulfilling prophesies in organizations. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 91–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Engell Andrew D., Haxby James V., Todorov Alexander, Implicit Trustworthiness Decisions: Automatic Coding of Face Properties in the Human Amygdala, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508
  20. Glazer, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence versus forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  21. Goulding Christina, Grounded Theory, ISBN:9780761966821, 10.4135/9781849209236
  22. Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2011). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  23. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1985). Exploring data tables, trends and shapes. New York: Wiley.
  24. Holman David, Chissick Claire, Totterdell Peter, 10.1023/a:1015194108376
  25. HOVORKA-MEAD AUDRA D., ROSS WILUAM H., WHIPPLE TRACY, RENCHIN MICHELLA B., WATCHING THE DETECTIVES: SEASONAL STUDENT EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO ELECTRONIC MONITORING WITH AND WITHOUT ADVANCE NOTIFICATION, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00113.x
  26. Hunter, J. E. (1989). The Wonderlic Personnel Test as a predictor of training success and job performance. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic.
  27. HUSELID M. A., THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TURNOVER, PRODUCTIVITY, AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE., 10.2307/256741
  28. Jamieson Jeremy P., Mendes Wendy Berry, Blackstock Erin, Schmader Toni, Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015
  29. Joyce, A. (2005, November 20). A surprising response to cubicle misery: Wide-open spaces may improve productivity. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/19/AR2005111-900285.html .
  30. Judge Timothy A., Colbert Amy E., Ilies Remus, Intelligence and Leadership: A Quantitative Review and Test of Theoretical Propositions., 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.542
  31. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 75–170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  32. Larson James R., Callahan Christine, Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity., 10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.530
  33. Latham, G. P., & Seijts, G. H. (1999). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 421–429.
  34. Locke Edwin A., Latham Gary P., Work Motivation and Satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x
  35. Lyons Brian D., Hoffman Brian J., Michel John W., Not Much More Thang? An Examination of the Impact of Intelligence on NFL Performance, 10.1080/08959280902970401
  36. Mandler, G. (1993). Thought, memory, and learning: Effects of emotional stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 40–55). New York: Free Press.
  37. Markoff, J. (2010, September 5). The boss is robotic, and rolling up behind you. The New York Times, Section A: 1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/science/-05robots.html?pagewanted=all .
  38. Martinez Wendy, Angel Angel, Solka Jeffrey, Exploratory Data Analysis with MATLAB, Second Edition, ISBN:9781439812204, 10.1201/b10434
  39. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
  40. Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (Eds.). (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
  41. Neuman, W. L. (2010). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods (7th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  42. Rist, R. C. (2000). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 266–301.
  43. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  44. Schmidt Frank L., Hunter John E., The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings., 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
  45. Schmidt Frank L., Hunter John, General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance., 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162
  46. SCHMIDT FRANK L., SHAFFER JONATHAN A., OH IN-SUE, INCREASED ACCURACY FOR RANGE RESTRICTION CORRECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY AND GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY IN JOB AND TRAINING PERFORMANCE, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x
  47. Simon, H. (1976). Identifying basic abilities underlying intelligent performance of complex tasks. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 65–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  48. Smith M.J., Carayon P., Sanders K.J., Lim S-Y., LeGrande D., Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring, 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90006-h
  49. Sohn Young Woo, Doane Stephanie M., Roles of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance, 10.3758/bf03194403
  50. Stanton Jeffrey M., Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions, 10.1207/s15327043hup1301_4
  51. Stanton Jeffrey M., Barnes-Farrell Janet L., Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance., 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.738
  52. Stanton Jeffrey M, Julian Amanda L, The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance, 10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00029-2
  53. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Menlo, CA: Addison Wesley.
  54. van Dick Rolf, Stellmacher Jost, Wagner Ulrich, Lemmer Gunnar, Tissington Patrick A., Group membership salience and task performance, 10.1108/02683940910989011
  55. van Harreveld Frenk, Rutjens Bastiaan T., Rotteveel Mark, Nordgren Loran F., van der Pligt Joop, Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence, 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
  56. van Knippenberg Daan, Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective, 10.1111/1464-0597.00020
  57. Vinchur Andrew J., Schippmann Jeffery S., Switzer Fred S., III, Roth Philip L., A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople., 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.586
  58. Watson David, Clark Lee Anna, Tellegen Auke, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales., 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  59. Wells Deborah L., Moorman Robert H., Werner Jon M., The impact of the perceived purpose of electronic performance monitoring on an array of attitudinal variables, 10.1002/hrdq.1194
  60. Wholey Joseph S., Hatry Harry P., The Case for Performance Monitoring, 10.2307/977173
  61. Wonderlic, Inc. (2004, March). The Wonderlic QuickTest series of tests successfully predicts scores on the Wonderlic Personel Test (WPT). Research note available from Wonderlic Inc., 1795 North Butterfield Road, Libertyville, IL.
  62. Yerkes Robert M., Dodson John D., The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation, 10.1002/cne.920180503
  63. Zellars Kelly L., Meurs James A., Perrewé Pamela L., Kacmar Charles J., Rossi Ana Maria, Reacting to and recovering from a stressful situation: The negative affectivity-physiological arousal relationship., 10.1037/a0013823