User menu

Fighting behaviour as a correlate of male mating success in black grouse Tetrao tetrix

Bibliographic reference Hamalainen, Anni ; Alatalo, Rauno, V. ; Lebigre, Christophe ; Siitari, Heli ; Soulsbury, Carl, D.. Fighting behaviour as a correlate of male mating success in black grouse Tetrao tetrix. In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 66, no.12, p. 1577-1586 (2012)
Permanent URL
  1. Alatalo Rauno V., Höglund Jacob, Lundberg Arne, Lekking in the black grouse— a test of male viability, 10.1038/352155a0
  2. Alatalo Rauno V., Höglund Jacob, Lundberg Arne, Sutherland William J., Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks, 10.1093/beheco/3.1.53
  3. ALATALO RAUNO V., BURKE TERRY, DANN JANINE, HANOTTE OLIVIER, HÖGLUND JACOB, LUNDBERG ARNE, MOSS ROBERT, RINTAMÄKI PEKKA T., Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse, 10.1006/anbe.1996.0234
  4. Alatalo R. V., Hoglund J., Lundberg A., Rintamaki P. T., Silverin B., Testosterone and Male Mating Success on the Black Grouse Leks, 10.1098/rspb.1996.0248
  5. Alonso Juan C., Magaña Marina, Martín Carlos A., Palacín Carlos, Sexual Traits as Quality Indicators in Lekking Male Great Bustards : Sexual Traits in Male Great Bustards, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01827.x
  6. Alonso Juan C., Magaña Marina, Palacín Carlos, Martín Carlos A., Correlates of male mating success in great bustard leks: the effects of age, weight, and display effort, 10.1007/s00265-010-0972-6
  7. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  8. Archer J (1988) The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  9. Berglund Anders, Bisazza Angelo, Pilastro Andrea, Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x
  10. Borgia Gerald, SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF MATING SYSTEMS, Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (1979) ISBN:9780121087500 p.19-80, 10.1016/b978-0-12-108750-0.50008-2
  11. BRIFFA M., SNEDDON L. U., Physiological constraints on contest behaviour, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01188.x
  12. Byers John, Hebets Eileen, Podos Jeffrey, Female mate choice based upon male motor performance, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.009
  13. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Gibson R.M., Guinness F.E., The logical stag: Adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90141-6
  14. Clutton-Brock T. H., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M., Robertson A., Mate choice on fallow deer leks, 10.1038/340463a0
  15. R Development Core Team (2009) R A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at:
  16. Harris W. Edwin, Moore Patricia J., Female Mate Preference and Sexual Conflict: Females Prefer Males That Have Had Fewer Consorts, 10.1086/429352
  17. Helminen M (1963) Composition of the Finnish populations of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, in the autumns of 1952–1961, as revealed by a study of wings. Riistatiet Julk 8:142–149
  18. Höglund Jacob, Alatalo Rauno V., Leks : , ISBN:9781400864157, 10.1515/9781400864157
  19. H�glund Jacob, Robertson JeremyG.M., Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media), 10.1007/bf00172084
  20. H�glund Jacob, Alatalo RaunoV., Lundberg Arne, The effects of parasites on male ornaments and female choice in the lek-breeding black grouse (Tetrao tetrix), 10.1007/bf00173942
  21. Höglund Jacob, Alatalo Rauno V., Lundberg Arne, Rätti Osmo, Context-dependent effects of tail-ornament damage on mating success in black grouse, 10.1093/beheco/5.2.182
  22. HÖGLUND JACOB, JOHANSSON TOMAS, PELABON CHRISTOPHE, Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse, 10.1006/anbe.1996.0459
  23. Hood GM (2010) PopTools version 3.2.5. Available at:
  24. Hovi M., Alatalo R. V., Hoglund J., Lundberg A., Rintamaki P. T., Lek Centre Attracts Black Grouse Females, 10.1098/rspb.1994.0177
  25. Hovi Matti, Alatalo Rauno V., Siikamäki Pirkko, Black Grouse leks on ice: Female mate sampling by incitation of male competition?, 10.1007/bf00177408
  26. Iossa Graziella, Soulsbury Carl D., Baker Philip J., Harris Stephen, Body Mass, Territory Size, and Life-History Tactics in a Socially Monogamous Canid, the Red FoxVulpes vulpes, 10.1644/07-mamm-a-405.1
  27. Jennings Domhnall J., Gammell Martin P., Carlin Caitriona M., Hayden Thomas J., Is Difference in Body Weight, Antler Length, Age or Dominance Rank related to the Number of Fights between Fallow Deer (Dama dama)?., 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01154.x
  28. Kervinen Matti, Alatalo Rauno V., Lebigre Christophe, Siitari Heli, Soulsbury Carl D., Determinants of yearling male lekking effort and mating success in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix), 10.1093/beheco/ars104
  29. Klinkova Ekaterina, Hodges J. Keith, Fuhrmann Kerstin, de Jong Tom, Heistermann Michael, Male Dominance Rank, Female Mate Choice and Male Mating and Reproductive Success in Captive Chimpanzees, 10.1007/s10764-005-2929-6
  30. Kokko Hanna, Lindström Jan, Alatalo Rauno V., Rintamäki Pekka T., Queuing for territory positions in the lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix), 10.1093/beheco/9.4.376
  31. Kokko H., Rintamaki P. T., Alatalo R. V., Hoglund J., Karvonen E., Lundberg A., Female choice selects for lifetime lekking performance in black grouse males, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0895
  32. Kotiaho Janne, Alatalo Rauno V., Mappes Johanna, Parri Silja, Fighting success in relation to body mass and drumming activity in the male wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata, 10.1139/z97-777
  33. Krujit JP, de Vos GJ (1988) Individual variation in reproductive success in male black grouse, Tetrao tetrix L. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 279–290
  34. Lane Jeffrey E., Boutin Stan, Gunn Melissa R., Coltman David W., Sexually selected behaviour: red squirrel males search for reproductive success, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01502.x
  35. LEBIGRE C., ALATALO R. V., SIITARI H., PARRI S., Restrictive mating by females on black grouse leks, 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03502.x
  36. Lebigre C., Alatalo R. V., Kilpimaa J., Staszewski V., Siitari H., Leucocyte counts variation and measures of male fitness in the lekking Black Grouse, 10.1007/s10336-011-0701-6
  37. Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman Hall, London
  38. McElligott Alan G., Mattiangeli Valeria, Mattiello Silvana, Verga Marina, Reynolds Catherine A., Hayden Thomas J., Fighting Tactics of Fallow Bucks (Dama dama, Cervidae): Reducing the Risks of Serious Conflict, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00112.x
  39. McElligott Alan G., Gammell Martin P., Harty Hilda C., Paini Dean R., Murphy Desmond T., Walsh James T., Hayden Thomas J., Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success?, 10.1007/s002650000293
  40. Moore A. J., Moore P. J., Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition, 10.1098/rspb.1999.0694
  41. Moore A. J., Gowaty P. A., Moore P. J., Females avoid manipulative males and live longer : Females avoid manipulative males and live longer, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00527.x
  42. Mougeot François, Irvine Justin R., Seivwright Linzi, Redpath Steve M., Piertney Stuart, Testosterone, immunocompetence, and honest sexual signaling in male red grouse, 10.1093/beheco/arh087
  43. O’Hara Robert B., Kotze D. Johan, Do not log-transform count data : Do not log-transform count data, 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00021.x
  44. Ophir Alexander G, Galef Bennett G, Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners, 10.1006/anbe.2003.2230
  45. Ostner Julia, Heistermann Michael, Schülke Oliver, Male competition and its hormonal correlates in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis), 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.10.017
  46. Peters Marianne, Simmons Leigh W., Rhodes Gillian, Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.008
  47. Pörschmann P, Trillmich F, Mueller B, Wolf JBW (2010) Male reproductive success and its behavioural correlates in a polygynous mammal, the Galápagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki). Mol Ecol 19:2574–2596
  48. Qvarnstrom A., Experimentally increased badge size increases male competition and reduces male parental care in the collared flycatcher, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0169
  49. Qvarnström Anna, Forsgren Elisabet, Should females prefer dominant males?, 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01513-4
  50. Rands Sean A., Evans Matthew R., Johnstone Rufus A., The Dynamics of Honesty: Modelling the Growth of Costly, Sexually-Selected Ornaments, 10.1371/journal.pone.0027174
  51. RÉALE D., MARTIN J., COLTMAN D. W., POISSANT J., FESTA-BIANCHET M., Male personality, life-history strategies and reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01781.x
  52. Reynolds John D., Gross Mart R., Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox?, 10.1086/285093
  53. Rintamaki Pekka T., Alatalo Rauno V., Höglund Jacob, Lundberg Arne, Male territoriality and female choice on black grouse leks, 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80208-8
  54. Rintamäki Pekka T., Alatalo Rauno V, Höglund Jacob, Lundberg Arne, Mate sampling behaviour of black grouse females (Tetrao tetrix), 10.1007/bf00176719
  55. Rintamäki PT, Hovi M, Alatalo RV (1997) Miten seksuaalivalinta toimii teeren soitimella. Suomen Riista 43:48–55
  56. Rintamaki Pekka T., Karvonen Eevi, Alatalo Rauno V., Lundberg Arne, Why Do Black Grouse Males Perform on Lek Sites outside the Breeding Season?, 10.2307/3677008
  57. Rintamaki P. T., Combs and sexual selection in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix), 10.1093/beheco/11.5.465
  58. Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (2001) Correlates of male mating success on black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) leks. Ann Zool Fenn 38:99–109
  59. Rohwer Sievert, The Social Significance of Avian Winter Plumage Variability, 10.2307/2407071
  60. Sæther Stein Are, Baglo Ragnhild, Fiske Peder, Ekblom Robert, Höglund Jacob, Kålås John Atle, Direct and Indirect Mate Choice on Leks, 10.1086/431248
  61. Sheldon B. C., Sexually Transmitted Disease in Birds: Occurrence and Evolutionary Significance, 10.1098/rstb.1993.0044
  62. Siitari Heli, Alatalo Rauno V., Halme Panu, Buchanan Katherine L., Kilpimaa Janne, Color Signals in the Black Grouse (Tetrao tetrix): Signal Properties and Their Condition Dependency, 10.1086/510140
  63. Stein Adam C., Uy J. Albert C., Plumage brightness predicts male mating success in the lekking golden-collared manakin, Manacus vitellinus, 10.1093/beheco/ari095
  64. Stokkan KA (1979) Testosterone and daylength-dependent development of comb size and breeding plumage of male willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus lagopus). Auk 96:106–111
  65. Trobec Roger J., Oring Lewis W., Effects of Testosterone Propionate Implantation on Lek Behavior of Sharp-Tailed Grouse, 10.2307/2423584
  66. Vehrencamp Sandra L., Bradbury Jack W., Gibson Robert M., The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse, 10.1016/s0003-3472(89)80120-4
  67. Venables W. N., Ripley B. D., Modern Applied Statistics with S, ISBN:9781441930088, 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  68. Verhulst Simon, Salomons H. Martijn, Why fight? Socially dominant jackdaws, Corvus monedula, have low fitness, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.020
  69. Warner R. R., Shapiro D. Y., Marcanato A., Petersen C. W., Sexual Conflict: Males with Highest Mating Success Convey the Lowest Fertilization Benefits to Females, 10.1098/rspb.1995.0187
  70. Zuk Marlene, Thornhill Randy, Ligon J. David, Johnson Kristine, Austad Steven, Ligon Sandra H., Thornhill Nancy Wilmsen, Costin Colleen, The Role of Male Ornaments and Courtship Behavior in Female Mate Choice of Red Jungle Fowl, 10.1086/285107
  71. Zuk Marlene, Popma Stacey L., Johnsen Torgeir S., Male Courtship Displays, Ornaments and Female Mate Choice in Captive Red Jungle Fowl, 10.1163/156853995x00027