User menu

Spatially and financially explicit population viability analysis of maculinea alcon in The Netherlands

Bibliographic reference Radchuk, Viktoriia ; WallisDeVries, Michiel F. ; Schtickzelle, Nicolas. Spatially and financially explicit population viability analysis of maculinea alcon in The Netherlands. In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, no.6, p. e38684 (2012)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/138096
  1. I Hanski (1999)
  2. Hodgson Jenny A., Moilanen Atte, Wintle Brendan A., Thomas Chris D., Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation : Area, quality and connectivity, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01919.x
  3. Hanski Ilkka, Thomas Chris D., Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies, 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90348-4
  4. Thomas J. A., Bourn N. A. D., Clarke R. T., Stewart K. E., Simcox D. J., Pearman G. S., Curtis R., Goodger B., The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1693
  5. WallisDeVries Michiel F., Ens Sicco H., Effects of Habitat Quality and Isolation on the Colonization of Restored Heathlands by Butterflies, 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00447.x
  6. N Schtickzelle (2009)
  7. Insect conservation biology, ISBN:9781845932541, 10.1079/9781845932541.0000
  8. CL Boggs (2003)
  9. (2010)
  10. Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Higher productivity at the cost of increased host-specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00153.x
  11. Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A., Wardlaw J.C., Hochberg M.E., Clarke R.T., Simcox D.J., 10.1023/a:1009696823965
  12. Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Wardlaw J. C., Woyciechowski M., Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests, 10.1007/bf00378660
  13. Als Thomas Damm, Nash David R., Boomsma Jacobus J., Adoption of parasitic Maculinea alcon caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by three Myrmica ant species, 10.1006/anbe.2001.1716
  14. Thomas J. A., Simcox D. J., Clarke R. T., Successful Conservation of a ThreatenedMaculineaButterfly, 10.1126/science.1175726
  15. Maes Dirk, Vanreusel Wouter, Talloen Willem, Dyck Hans Van, Functional conservation units for the endangered Alcon Blue butterfly Maculinea alcon in Belgium (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.018
  16. Nowicki Piotr, Bonelli Simona, Barbero Francesca, Balletto Emilio, Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics, 10.1007/s00442-009-1373-2
  17. Dyck H. v., Oostermeijer J. G. B., Talloen W., Feenstra V., Hidde A. v. d., Wynhoff I., Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly?, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1082
  18. MF WallisDeVries, Conservation Biology, 18, 489 (2004)
  19. Gadeberg Rebekka M.E., Boomsma Jacobus J., 10.1023/a:1018439211244
  20. Nash D. R., Als T. D., Maile R., Jones G. R., Boomsma J. J., A Mosaic of Chemical Coevolution in a Large Blue Butterfly, 10.1126/science.1149180
  21. Schonrogge K., Wardlaw J. C., Thomas J. A., Thomas G. W., Polymorphic growth rates in myrmecophilous insects, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1070
  22. Hochberg Michael E., Thomas Jeremy A., Elmes Graham W., A Modelling Study of the Population Dynamics of a Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea rebeli, a Parasite of Red Ant Nests, 10.2307/5331
  23. Hochberg M.E., Clarke R.T., Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A., Population Dynamic Consequences of Direct and Indirect Interactions Involving a Large Blue Butterfly and its Plant and Red Ant Hosts, 10.2307/5555
  24. Hovestadt Thomas, Mitesser Oliver, Elmes Graham W., Thomas Jeremy A., Hochberg Michael E., An Evolutionarily Stable Strategy Model for the Evolution of Dimorphic Development in the ButterflyMaculinea rebeli, a Social Parasite ofMyrmicaAnt Colonies, 10.1086/512134
  25. JOHST KARIN, DRECHSLER MARTIN, THOMAS JEREMY, SETTELE JOSEF, Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species : Influence of mowing on butterfly persistence, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01125.x
  26. SF Railsback, Ecology, 83, 1817 (2002)
  27. Clarke R. T., Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Hochberg M. E., The effects of spatial patterns in habitat quality on community dynamics within a site, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0050
  28. Mouquet Nicolas, Belrose Valérie, Thomas Jeremy A., Elmes Graham W., Clarke Ralph T., Hochberg Michael E., CONSERVING COMMUNITY MODULES: A CASE STUDY OF THE ENDANGERED LYCAENID BUTTERFLY MACULINEA ALCON, 10.1890/04-1664
  29. Clarke R.T., Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Wardlaw J.C., Munguira M.L., Hochberg M.E., 10.1023/a:1009688622147
  30. Mouquet Nicolas, Thomas Jeremy A., Elmes Graham W., Clarke Ralph T., Hochberg Michael E., POPULATION DYNAMICS AND CONSERVATION OF A SPECIALIZED PREDATOR: A CASE STUDY OF MACULINEA ARION, 10.1890/05-0319
  31. Griebeler Eva Maria, Seitz Alfred, An individual based model for the conservation of the endangered Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00131-x
  32. I Wynhoff, 15 (1996)
  33. P Nowicki (2005)
  34. Hovestadt Thomas, Binzenhöfer Birgit, Nowicki Piotr, Settele Josef, Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes : Mixed kernels for study of dispersal, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01848.x
  35. J Clobert (2001)
  36. HR Akcakaya (2002)
  37. Nowicki Piotr, Pepkowska Aleksandra, Kudlek Joanna, Skórka Piotr, Witek Magdalena, Settele Josef, Woyciechowski Michal, From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.001
  38. Hanski Ilkka, Alho Juha, Moilanen Atte, ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS, 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0239:etposa]2.0.co;2
  39. Nowicki Piotr, Vrabec Vladimir, Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations, 10.1007/s00442-011-2025-x
  40. Ginzburg Lev R., Slobodkin Lawrence B., Johnson Keith, Bindman Andrew G., Quasiextinction Probabilities as a Measure of Impact on Population Growth, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01379.x
  41. DM Hamby, 135 (1994)
  42. Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Liska R., Saltelli A., The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.045
  43. Courchamp Franck, Berec Ludek, Gascoigne Joanna, Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation, ISBN:9780198570301, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570301.001.0001
  44. Schultz Cheryl B., Hammond Paul C., Using Population Viability Analysis to Develop Recovery Criteria for Endangered Insects: Case Study of the Fender's Blue Butterfly, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02141.x
  45. Schtickzelle Nicolas, Choutt Julie, Goffart Philippe, Fichefet Violaine, Baguette Michel, Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.030
  46. Schtickzelle Nicolas, Baguette Michel, Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12825.x
  47. Schtickzelle Nicolas, WallisDeVries Michiel F., Baguette Michel, Using surrogate data in population viability analysis: the case of the critically endangered cranberry fritillary butterfly, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13745.x
  48. Als Thomas D., Vila Roger, Kandul Nikolai P., Nash David R., Yen Shen-Horn, Hsu Yu-Feng, Mignault André A., Boomsma Jacobus J., Pierce Naomi E., The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies, 10.1038/nature03020
  49. Barbero F., Thomas J. A, Bonelli S., Balletto E., Schonrogge K., Queen Ants Make Distinctive Sounds That Are Mimicked by a Butterfly Social Parasite, 10.1126/science.1163583
  50. van Langevelde F., Wynhoff I., What limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species after their reintroduction: quality or spatial arrangement of habitat? : Spread of butterfly species after reintroduction, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00281.x
  51. Nowicki Piotr, Witek Madgalena, Skórka Piotr, Settele Josef, Woyciechowski Michal, Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation, 10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3
  52. Schneider Christine, Dover John, Fry Gary L. A., Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00494.x
  53. ZEISSET INGA, DAMM ALS THOMAS, SETTELE JOSEF, BOOMSMA JACOBUS J., Microsatellite markers for the large blue butterflies Maculinea nausithous and Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and their amplification in other Maculinea species, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00872.x
  54. Henein Kringen, Wegner John, Merriam Gray, Population Effects of Landscape Model Manipulation on Two Behaviourally Different Woodland Small Mammals, 10.2307/3546479
  55. FALCY MATTHEW R., ESTADES CRISTIÁN F., Effectiveness of Corridors Relative to Enlargement of Habitat Patches, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00766.x
  56. STEVENS VIRGINIE M., BAGUETTE MICHEL, Importance of Habitat Quality and Landscape Connectivity for the Persistence of Endangered Natterjack Toads, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00990.x