User menu

Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review

Bibliographic reference Durão, Ana R ; Pittayapat, Pisha ; Rockenbach, Ivete B ; Olszewski, Raphaël ; Ng, Suk ; et. al. Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review. In: Progress in Orthodontics (Print), Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 31 [1-11] (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/135883
  1. AlBarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA, The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods, 10.1259/dmfr/37010910
  2. Nijkamp P. G., Habets L. L. M. H., Aartman I. H. A., Zentner A., The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning, 10.1093/ejo/cjn059
  3. Atchison Kathryn A., Luke Larry S., White Stuart C., Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making, 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90477-t
  4. Bourriau Jérôme, Bidange Guillaume, Foucart Jean-Michel, Les erreurs de mesure en céphalométrie 2D, 10.1051/orthodfr/2012002
  5. Atchison Kathryn A., Luke Larry S., White Stuart C., An algorithm for ordering pretreatment orthodontic radiographs, 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70012-y
  6. Gijbels F, Serhal C B, Willems G, Bosmans H, Sanderink G, Persoons M, Jacobs R, Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study, 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600585
  7. Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Wyatt J, Van Dam J, Nowak B, Jacobs R, Radiation doses of collimatedvsnon-collimated cephalometric exposures, 10.1259/dmfr/33233723
  8. Fryback Dennis G., Thornbury John R., The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging, 10.1177/0272989x9101100203
  9. Whiting Penny, Rutjes Anne WS, Reitsma Johannes B, Bossuyt Patrick MM, Kleijnen Jos, The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews, 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
  10. Moher David, Liberati Alessandro, Tetzlaff Jennifer, Altman Douglas G., Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  11. Baumrind Sheldon, Frantz Robert C., The reliability of head film measurements, 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90028-5
  12. Haynes S., Chau M. N. Y., Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis, 10.1093/ejo/15.1.79
  13. Houston W. J. B., Maher R. E., McElroy D., Sherriff M., Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs, 10.1093/ejo/8.3.149
  14. Tng T. T. H., Chan T. C. K., Hagg U., Cooke M. S., Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls, 10.1093/ejo/16.2.110
  15. Ahlqvist J., Eliasson S., Welander U., The effect of projection errors on cephalometric length measurements, 10.1093/ejo/8.3.141
  16. Kvam E., Krogstad O., Variability in Tracings Pf Lateral Head Plates for Diagnostic Orthodontic Purposes. A Methodologic Study, 10.3109/00016356909040415
  17. Abdullah RTH, Kuijpers MAR, Berge SJ, Katsaros C, Steiner cephalometric analysis: predicted and actual treatment outcome compared, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00363.x